A phase II randomized study of lenalidomide or lenalidomide and rituximab as maintenance therapy following standard chemotherapy for patients with high/high-intermediate risk diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
SUBMITTER: Reddy NM
PROVIDER: S-EPMC5214342 | biostudies-literature | 2017 Jan
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Publications
A phase II randomized study of lenalidomide or lenalidomide and rituximab as maintenance therapy following standard chemotherapy for patients with high/high-intermediate risk diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.
Reddy N M NM Greer J P JP Morgan D S DS Chen H H Park S I SI Richards K L KL
Leukemia 20160922 1
Similar Datasets
Project description:Clinical trials frequently include multiple end points that mature at different times. The initial report, typically based on the primary end point, may be published when key planned co-primary or secondary analyses are not yet available. Clinical Trial Updates provide an opportunity to disseminate additional results from studies, published in JCO or elsewhere, for which the primary end point has already been reported.The RELEVANCE trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01650701) showed that lenalidomide plus rituximab (R2) provided similar efficacy to rituximab plus chemotherapy (R-chemo) in patients with advanced-stage, previously untreated follicular lymphoma (FL). We report the second interim analysis of the RELEVANCE trial after 6 years of follow-up. Patients with previously untreated grade 1-3a FL were assigned 1:1 to R2 or R-chemo, followed by rituximab maintenance. Coprimary end points were complete response (confirmed/unconfirmed) at week 120 and progression-free survival (PFS). At median follow-up of 72 months, 6-year PFS was 60% and 59% for R2 and R-chemo, respectively (hazard ratio = 1.03 [95% CI, 0.84 to 1.27]). Six-year overall survival was estimated to be 89% in both groups. Median PFS and overall survival were not reached in either group. Overall response after progression was 61% and 59%, and 5-year estimated survival rate after progression was 69% and 74% in the R2 and R-chemo groups, respectively. The transformation rate per year in the R2 and R-chemo groups was 0.68% and 0.45%, and secondary primary malignancies occurred in 11% and 13% (P = .34), respectively. No new safety signals were observed. R2 continues to demonstrate comparable, durable efficacy and safety versus R-chemo in previously untreated patients with FL and provides an acceptable chemo-free alternative.
| S-EPMC9553375 | biostudies-literature
Project description:There is an unmet need for effective biological therapies for relapsed central nervous system (CNS) lymphoma. Lenalidomide is active in activated B-cell type diffuse large B-cell lymphoma and rituximab is effective in CNS lymphoma. These observations are the basis for this first trial of an immunomodulatory drug as monotherapy in CNS lymphoma, and, in patients with inadequate responses to lenalidomide, with rituximab. In an independent cohort, we evaluated lenalidomide maintenance after salvage with high-dose methotrexate or focal irradiation in relapsed primary CNS lymphoma (PCNSL). We determined safety, efficacy, and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) penetration of lenalidomide at 10-, 15-, and 20-mg dose levels in 14 patients with refractory CD20+ CNS lymphoma. Nine subjects with relapsed, refractory CNS lymphoma achieved better than partial response with lenalidomide monotherapy, 6 maintained response ≥9 months, and 4 maintained response ≥18 months. Median progression-free survival for lenalidomide/rituximab was 6 months. In the independent cohort, response duration with lenalidomide maintenance after complete responses 2 through 5 were significantly longer than response durations after standard therapy. The CSF/plasma partition coefficient of lenalidomide was ≥20% at 15- and 20-mg dose levels. Change in CSF interleukin-10 at 1 month correlated with clinical response and response duration to lenalidomide. Metabolomic profiling of CSF identified novel biomarkers, including lactate, and implicated indoleamine-2,3 dioxygenase activity with CNS lymphoma progression on lenalidomide. We conclude that lenalidomide penetrates ventricular CSF and is active as monotherapy in relapsed CNS lymphomas. We provide evidence that maintenance lenalidomide potentiates response duration after salvage in relapsed PCNSL and delays whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT). This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT01542918.
| S-EPMC6039666 | biostudies-literature
Project description: Not available
| S-EPMC10431143 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Primary vitreoretinal lymphoma (PVRL) is a rare variant of primary central nervous system (CNS) lymphoma, for which currently there are no optimal treatment options. This prospective single-center study enrolled immunocompetent patients with newly diagnosed PVRL between August 2018 and January 2020. Patients received local and systemic therapies: intravitreal methotrexate (MTX, 400 μg, 0.1 mL) injections for 1 year (total 16 injections) and six cycles of the rituximab (375 mg/m2 on day 1) and lenalidomide (25 mg on day 1-21; R2) regimen. Lenalidomide was maintained for 2 years in patients who had achieved a response. We enrolled 11 patients with a mean age of 58 (range, 48-70) years, of which 10 achieved complete remission at the first evaluation. The median follow-up period was 18.3 (range, 10.6-27.8) months, and the median progression-free survival was 12.7 months. Moreover, a total of eight patients relapsed. The most common adverse event (AE) was neutropenia, which occurred in seven patients (63.6%), followed by grade 3 ocular toxicities, including cataract formation, in six patients (54%). These findings suggest that the R2 regimen combined with intravitreal MTX, followed by lenalidomide maintenance, is a safe option for PVRL with moderate efficacy. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (number NCT03746223).
| S-EPMC8264769 | biostudies-literature
Project description:PurposeThe addition of rituximab to standard chemotherapy has significantly improved survival in patients with lymphoma. Recently, maintenance therapy with rituximab has been shown to prevent relapse and provide survival benefits for patients with follicular or mantle cell lymphoma. However, the effects of rituximab in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) remain unclear. Two new studies involving rituximab in the treatment of DLBCL were performed this past year. We performed a meta analysis to evaluate the effects of rituximab maintenance treatment of patients with DLBCL.MethodsSeveral databases (PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials) databases were reviewed for relevant randomized controlled trials published prior to May, 2016. Two reviewers assessed the quality of the included studies and extracted data independently. The hazard ratios (HRs) for time-to-event data and relative risks (RRs) for the other data were pooled and estimated.ResultsTotally 5 studies including 1740 patients were eligible for the meta-analysis. Compared to the observation group, patients who received rituximab maintenance therapy had significantly improved event-free survival (EFS) (HR = 0.80, 95% CI: 0.65-0.98) and progression-free survival (PFS) (HR = 0.72, 95% CI: 0.54-0.94). However, there was no statistically significant difference in overall survival (OS) (HR = 0.66, 95% CI: 0.27-1.29). A subgroup analysis suggested that male patients may benefit from rituximab maintenance therapy with a better EFS (HR = 0.53, 95% CI: 0.34-0.82-), while this advantage was not observed in female patients (HR = 0.99, 95% CI: 0.64-1.52).ConclusionsRituximab maintenance may provide survival benefits beyond that afforded by first- and second-line chemotherapy alone, especially in male patients. However, maintenance rituximab treatment may cause more adverse events. It is recommended that both survival benefits and adverse events should be taken into consideration when making treatment decisions.
| S-EPMC5371376 | biostudies-literature
Project description: Not available
| S-EPMC5060037 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is the most common form of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) in adults. Even if the natural history of DLBCL has been improved with the advent of immunochemotherapy, the survival results obtained with current treatment options clearly indicate that new agents or novel approaches are needed. Lenalidomide (Revlimid, Celgene Corporation, Summit, NJ, USA), an analogue of thalidomide, is an immunomodulatory drug with pleiotropic mechanisms of action potentially adding to immunochemotherapy. We present here the biological rational for the use of lenalidomide in DLBCL in light of recent advances in the pathophysiology of the disease and the therapeutic results of the most recent trials published in literature or reported in meetings in relapsed/refractory situations as well as in first-line treatment.
| S-EPMC3508519 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Complete molecular response (CMR) after first-line immunochemotherapy reflects treatment efficacy and may predict prognosis in patients with follicular lymphoma (FL). RELEVANCE is the first phase 3 trial comparing the chemotherapy-free regimen lenalidomide/rituximab (R2) vs rituximab/chemotherapy (R-Chemo) in previously untreated FL patients (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01650701). The objective of the minimal residual disease (MRD) analysis was to determine the ability of a chemotherapy-free regimen to induce CMR. Of 440 French patients participating in the Lymphoma Study Association (LYSA) RELEVANCE MRD study, all 222 patients with a BIOMED-2-detectable BCL2-JH translocation at diagnosis were analyzed. MRD was quantified by droplet digital polymerase chain reaction with a sensitivity ≤10-4. At week 24 (end of induction treatment), 98% and 78% of patients achieved CMR in peripheral blood (PB) and bone marrow (BM), respectively. Achievement of CMR (in PB and/or BM) had a significant impact on progression-free survival (PFS), with 3-year PFS of 84% and 55% for patients with CMR and detectable MRD, respectively (P = .015). CMR at week 24 was reached more frequently in the R2 arm (105/117; 90%) than in the R-Chemo arm (70/90; 77%) (P = .022). The poor prognostic value in terms of PFS for the persistence of molecular disease was observed irrespective of treatment arm (interaction test, P = .31). In agreement with the clinical results of the RELEVANCE trial, our results show that R2 immunomodulatory treatment in first-line FL can achieve high rates of CMR.
| S-EPMC7391139 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundDiffuse large B-cell lymphoma is a clinically and molecularly heterogeneous disease. Gene expression profiling studies have shown that the tumor microenvironment affects survival and that the angiogenesis-related signature is prognostically unfavorable. The contribution of histopathological microvessel density to survival in diffuse large B-cell lymphomas treated with immunochemotherapy remains unknown. The purpose of this study is to assess the prognostic impact of histopathological microvessel density in two independent series of patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma treated with immunochemotherapy.Design and methodsOne hundred and forty-seven patients from the Leukemia Lymphoma Molecular Profiling Project (training series) and 118 patients from the Catalan Lymphoma-Study group-GELCAB (validation cohort) were included in the study. Microvessels were immunostained with CD31 and quantified with a computerized image analysis system. The stromal scores previously defined in 110 Leukemia Lymphoma Molecular Profiling Project cases were used to analyze correlations with microvessel density data.ResultsMicrovessel density significantly correlated with the stromal score (r=0.3209; P<0.001). Patients with high microvessel density showed significantly poorer overall survival than those with low microvessel density both in the training series (4-year OS 54% vs. 78%; P=0.004) and in the validation cohort (57% vs. 81%; P=0.006). In multivariate analysis, in both groups high microvessel density was a statistically significant unfavorable prognostic factor independent of international prognostic index [training series: international prognostic index (relative risk 2.7; P=0.003); microvessel density (relative risk 1.96; P=0.002); validation cohort: international prognostic index (relative risk 4.74; P<0.001); microvessel density (relative risk 2.4; P=0.016)].ConclusionsThese findings highlight the impact of angiogenesis in the outcome of patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma and the interest of evaluating antiangiogenic drugs in clinical trials.
| S-EPMC3128218 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is associated with a poor prognosis. Outcomes are particularly poor following immunochemotherapy failure or relapse within 12 months of induction. We conducted a Phase I/II trial of lenalidomide plus RICE (rituximab, ifosfamide, carboplatin, and etoposide) (RICER) as a salvage regimen for first-relapse or primary refractory DLBCL. Dose-escalated lenalidomide was combined with RICE every 14 d. After three cycles of RICER, patients with chemosensitive disease underwent stem cell collection and consolidation with BEAM [BCNU (carmustine), etoposide, cytarabine, melphalan] followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (autoSCT). Patients who recovered from autoSCT toxicities within 90 d initiated maintenance treatment with lenalidomide 25 mg daily for 21 d every 28 d for 12 months. No dose-limiting or unexpected toxicities occurred with lenalidomide 25 mg plus RICE. Grade 3/4 haematological toxicities resolved appropriately, and planned dose density and dose intensity of RICER were preserved. No lenalidomide or RICE dose reductions were required in any of the three cycles. After two cycles of RICER, nine of 15 patients (60%) achieved a complete response, and two achieved a partial response (13%). Combining lenalidomide with RICE is feasible, and results in promising response rates (particularly complete response rates) in high-risk DLBCL patients.
| S-EPMC4283736 | biostudies-literature