Dataset Information

Age-specific effects on the prognosis after surgery for gastric cancer: A SEER population-based analysis.

ABSTRACT: Prognosis of age at diagnosis for gastric cancer (GC) has been investigated in a few studies with inconclusive results. To assess the survival of GC across different age groups, we searched the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database (1988-2010) and identified 10,092 patients undergoing gastrectomy. Analyses of the associations between age and 5-year GC-specific survival (GCSS) were carried out using the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox regression model. When the 50-59 year age group was used as reference group, patients younger than 50 years suffered similar survival rates, and the risk of death increased for patients older than 60 years (hazard ratio [HR], 1.11; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.02-1.20), peaking for ages > 80 years (HR, 1.60; 95% CI, 1.46-1.76). Overall, HRs of 5-year GCSS increased steadily with age, even when age was evaluated as a continuous variable. We assessed the survival differences associated with age between three groups, using the cut-off ages of 30 and 50 years. Compared with the elderly group, a high survival rate was observed in the mid-age group, but not in the youngest group. Stratified analysis for sex, race, tumor site, histology and clinical stage yielded consistent results. This study shows that the prognosis of GC varies with age, and young GC patients appear to have a favorable GCSS after surgical treatment. Further studies are warranted to verify our findings.

SUBMITTER: Song P

PROVIDER: S-EPMC5217043 | biostudies-literature | 2016 Jul

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Age-specific effects on the prognosis after surgery for gastric cancer: A SEER population-based analysis.

Song Peng P Wu Lei L Jiang Bo B Liu Zhijian Z Cao Ke K Guan Wenxian W

Oncotarget 20160701 30

Prognosis of age at diagnosis for gastric cancer (GC) has been investigated in a few studies with inconclusive results. To assess the survival of GC across different age groups, we searched the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database (1988-2010) and identified 10,092 patients undergoing gastrectomy. Analyses of the associations between age and 5-year GC-specific survival (GCSS) were carried out using the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox regression model. When the 50-59 year age gr ...[more]

PMID: 27224925

Similar Datasets

Project description:Purpose: Population-based data on the proportion and prognosis of liver metastases at diagnosis of gastric cancer are currently lacking. Besides, the treatment of gastric cancer with liver metastases is still controversial now. Methods: Patients with gastric cancer and liver metastases (GCLM) at the time of diagnosis in advanced gastric cancer were identified using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Result (SEER) database of the National Cancer Institute. Multivariable logistic and Cox regression were performed to identify predictors of the presence of GCLM at diagnosis and factors associated with all-cause mortality. Results: We identified 3507 patients with gastric cancer and liver metastases at the time of diagnosis, representing 16.89% of the entire cohort and 44.12% of the subset with metastatic disease to any distant site. Among entire cohort, multivariable logistic regression identified thirteen factors (age, race, sex, original, tumor location, pathology grade, Lauren classification, T staging, N staging, tumor size, number of extrahepatic metastatic sites to bone, lung, and brain, insurance situation and smoking) as predictors of the presence of liver metastases at diagnosis. Median survival among the entire cohort with GCLM was 4.0 months (interquartile range: 1.0-10.0 mo). Patients receiving comprehensive therapy had longer median overall survival, of which the median survival was 12.0 months (interquartile range: 6.0-31.0 mo). Multivariable Cox model in SEER cohort confirmed nine factors (age, tumor location, Lauren classification, T staging, number of extrahepatic metastatic sites to bone, lung, and brain, surgery, chemotherapy, RSC and marital status) as independent predictors for overall survival. Conclusions: The findings of this study provided population-based estimates of the proportion and prognosis for LM at time of GC diagnosis. These findings provide preventive guidelines for screening and treatment of LM in GC patients.

Project description:BackgroundThe dismal prognosis of gastric signet ring cell carcinoma (GSRC) is a global problem. The current study is conducted to comprehensively evaluate clinicopathological features and survival outcomes in GSRC patients stratified by anatomic subsites. Then, predictive nomograms are constructed and validated to improve the effectiveness of personalized management.MethodThe patients diagnosed with GSRC were recruited from the online SEER database. The influence of anatomic subsites on overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) was evaluated using multivariate Cox regression and Kaplan-Meier analysis. Then, we employed propensity score matching (PSM) technique to decrease selection bias and balance patients' epidemiological factors. Predictive nomograms were constructed and validated. Sensitivity analysis was performed to validate the conclusion.ResultsMultivariate Cox regression demonstrated that the patients with overlapping gastric cancer (OGC) suffered the highest mortality risk for OS (HR, 1.29; 95% CI, 1.23-1.36; P < 0.001) and CSS (HR, 1.33; 95% CI, 1.28-1.37; P < 0.001). Age, TNM stage, tumor localization, tumor size, surgery, and chemotherapy presented a highly significant relationship with OS and CSS. Following subgroup and PSM analysis, OGC patients were confirmed to have the worst OS and CSS. Then, nomograms predicting 6-month, 12-month, and 36-month survival were constructed. The area under the curve (AUC) value in ROC was 0.775 (95% CI, 0.761-0.793) for 6-month survival, 0.789 (95% CI, 0.776-0.801) for 12-month survival, and 0.780 (95% CI, 0.765-0.793) for 36-month survival in the OS group, while in the CSS group, it was 0.771 (95% CI, 0.758-0.790) for 6-month survival, 0.781 (95% CI, 0.770-0.799) for 12-month survival, and 0.773 (95% CI, 0.762-0.790) for 36-month survival.ConclusionWe identified anatomic subsites as a predictor of survival in those with GSRC. Patients with OGC suffered the highest mortality risk. The proposed nomograms allowed a relatively accurate survival prediction for GSRC patients.

Project description:BackgroundStudies have reported age as a risk factor for cardiovascular disease (CVD)-related mortality; however, only a few studies have focused on the relationship between age and CVD-related mortality, especially among major gastrointestinal cancers.MethodThe present retrospective cohort enrolled patients with colorectal, pancreatic, hepatocellular, gastric, and esophageal cancer between 2000 to 2015 from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results Registry (SEER). Standardized mortality ratio (SMR), competing risk regression, and restricted cubic spline (RCS) analyses were used in our study.ResultsWe analyzed 576,713 patients with major gastrointestinal cancers (327,800 patients with colorectal cancer, 93,310 with pancreatic cancer, 69,757 with hepatocellular cancer, 52,024 with gastric cancer, and 33,822 with esophageal cancer). Overall, CVD-related mortality gradually decreased every year, and the majority were older patients. All cancer patients had a higher CVD-related mortality rate than the general U.S.PopulationThe adjusted sub-hazard ratios for middle-aged with colorectal cancer, pancreatic cancer, hepatocellular cancer, gastric cancer, and esophageal cancer were 2.55 (95% CI: 2.15-3.03), 1.77 (95% CI: 1.06-2.97), 2.64 (95% CI: 1.60-4.36), 2.15 (95% CI: 1.32-3.51), and 2.28 (95% CI: 1.17-4.44), respectively. The adjusted sub-hazard ratios for older patients with colorectal cancer, pancreatic cancer, hepatocellular cancer, gastric cancer, and esophageal cancer were 11.23 (95% CI: 9.50-13.27), 4.05 (95% CI: 2.46-6.66), 4.47 (95% CI: 2.72-7.35), 7.16 (95% CI: 4.49-11.41), and 4.40 (95% CI: 2.28-8.48), respectively. A non-linear relationship between age at diagnosis and CVD-related mortality was found in colorectal cancer, pancreatic cancer, and esophageal cancer; their reference ages were 67, 69, and 66 years old, respectively.ConclusionThis study demonstrated that age was a risk factor for CVD-related mortality among major gastrointestinal cancers.

Project description:Age is an important risk factor for breast cancer, but data regarding whether patient age at diagnosis is related to breast cancer survival are conflicting. This population-based study evaluated the effect of age on breast cancer prognosis and identified outcome-related factors.We searched the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database and enrolled female primary non-metastatic cases. Patients were subdivided into seven groups, and analyses of the associations between age and overall survival (OS) and breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) were carried out using the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox regression model, respectively. We also assessed differences in survival among three specific age groups, using the ages of 30 and 50 years as cut-offs. Stratified analyses regarding race, histology, grade, stage and hormone receptor status were also carried out.A total of 133,057 female patients diagnosed with breast cancer from 2004 to 2008 were included in the current study (6.4% <40 years), Women aged 40 to 49 years and 60 to 69 years exhibited significantly better OS and BCSS, respectively (log-rank, p<0.001), than their counterparts in other groups. Middle-aged women exhibited distinctly better OS (log-rank, p<0.001) and BCSS (log-rank, p<0.001) than their counterparts in the other two age groups. Following adjustments for potential confounding factors, middle-age at breast cancer diagnosis was shown to be an independent predictor of favourable outcomes in terms of OS, but not BCSS (for OS, HR, 0.92; 95%CI, 0.87-0.98; p = 0.007; for BCSS, HR, 0.94; 95%CI, 0.80-1.01; p = 0.075, using the young group as reference). Stratified analysis showed that middle-age was significantly associated with increased survival, except among patients with stage III disease, and that elderly women faced worse prognoses than younger patients.Our results indicate that younger breast cancer patients exhibit more aggressive disease than older patients. Middle-aged patients exhibit better OS and BCSS than young and elderly patients but exhibit BCSS rates similar to those of young patients after adjustments for confounders. Stratified analysis demonstrated that middle-aged patients exhibited better survival than young patients, with the exception of patients with stage III disease. An age of 60 years or more was a significant independent predictor of a poor prognosis.

Dataset Information

Age-specific effects on the prognosis after surgery for gastric cancer: A SEER population-based analysis.

Publications

Age-specific effects on the prognosis after surgery for gastric cancer: A SEER population-based analysis.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets