Dataset Information

The Systematic Evaluation of Identifying the Infarct Related Artery Utilizing Cardiac Magnetic Resonance in Patients Presenting with ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Identification of the infarct-related artery (IRA) in patients with STEMI using coronary angiography (CA) is often based on the ECG and can be challenging in patients with severe multi-vessel disease. The current study aimed to determine how often percutaneous intervention (PCI) is performed in a coronary artery different from the artery supplying the territory of acute infarction on cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR).

Methods

We evaluated 113 patients from the Reduction of infarct Expansion and Ventricular remodeling with Erythropoetin After Large myocardial infarction (REVEAL) trial, who underwent CMR within 4±2 days of revascularization. Blinded reviewers interpreted CA to determine the IRA and CMR to determine the location of infarction on a 17-segment model. In patients with multiple infarcts on CMR, acuity was determined with T2-weighted imaging and/or evidence of microvascular obstruction.

Results

A total of 5 (4%) patients were found to have a mismatch between the IRA identified on CMR and CA. In 4/5 cases, there were multiple infarcts noted on CMR. Thirteen patients (11.5%) had multiple infarcts in separate territories on CMR with 4 patients (3.5%) having multiple acute infarcts and 9 patients (8%) having both acute and chronic infarcts.

Conclusions

In this select population of patients, the identification of the IRA by CA was incorrect in 4% of patients presenting with STEMI. Four patients with a mismatch had an acute infarction in more than one coronary artery territory on CMR. The role of CMR in patients presenting with STEMI with multi-vessel disease on CA deserves further investigation.

SUBMITTER: Hamo CE

PROVIDER: S-EPMC5218460 | biostudies-literature | 2017

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

The Systematic Evaluation of Identifying the Infarct Related Artery Utilizing Cardiac Magnetic Resonance in Patients Presenting with ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction.

Hamo Carine E CE Klem Igor I Rao Sunil V SV Songco Vincent V Najjar Samer S Lakatta Edward G EG Raman Subha V SV Harrington Robert A RA Heitner John F JF

PloS one 20170106 1

<h4>Background</h4>Identification of the infarct-related artery (IRA) in patients with STEMI using coronary angiography (CA) is often based on the ECG and can be challenging in patients with severe multi-vessel disease. The current study aimed to determine how often percutaneous intervention (PCI) is performed in a coronary artery different from the artery supplying the territory of acute infarction on cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR).<h4>Methods</h4>We evaluated 113 patients from the Re ...[more]

PMID: 28060863

Similar Datasets

Project description:BACKGROUND:Myocardial recovery after primary percutaneous coronary intervention in acute myocardial infarction is variable and the extent and severity of injury are difficult to predict. We sought to investigate the role of cardiovascular magnetic resonance T1 mapping in the determination of myocardial injury very early after treatment of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). METHODS:STEMI patients underwent 3?T cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR), within 3?h of primary percutaneous intervention (PPCI). T1 mapping determined the extent (area-at-risk as %left ventricle, AAR) and severity (average T1 values of AAR) of acute myocardial injury, and related these to late gadolinium enhancement (LGE), and microvascular obstruction (MVO). The characteristics of myocardial injury within 3?h was compared with changes at 24-h to predict final infarct size. RESULTS:Forty patients were included in this study. Patients with average T1 values of AAR ?1400?ms within 3?h of PPCI had larger LGE at 24-h (33% ±14 vs. 18% ±10, P?=?0.003) and at 6-months (27% ±9 vs. 12% ±9; P?<?0.001), higher incidence and larger extent of MVO (85% vs. 40%, P?=?0.016) & [4.0 (0.5-9.5)% vs. 0 (0-3.0)%, P?=?0.025]. The average T1 value was an independent predictor of acute LGE (? 0.61, 95%CI 0.13 to 1.09; P?=?0.015), extent of MVO (? 0.22, 95%CI 0.03 to 0.41, P?=?0.028) and final infarct size (? 0.63, 95%CI 0.21 to 1.05; P?=?0.005). Receiver-operating-characteristic analysis showed that T1 value of AAR obtained within 3-h, but not at 24-h, predicted large infarct size (LGE >?9.5%) with 100% positive predictive value at the optimal cut-off of 1400?ms (area-under-the-curve, AUC 0.88, P?=?0.006). CONCLUSION:Hyper-acute T1 values of the AAR (within 3?h post PPCI, but not 24?h) predict a larger extent of MVO and infarct size at both 24?h and 6?months follow-up. Delayed CMR scanning for 24?h could not substitute the significant value of hyper-acute average T1 in determining infarct characteristics.

Dataset Information

The Systematic Evaluation of Identifying the Infarct Related Artery Utilizing Cardiac Magnetic Resonance in Patients Presenting with ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction.

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Publications

The Systematic Evaluation of Identifying the Infarct Related Artery Utilizing Cardiac Magnetic Resonance in Patients Presenting with ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets