Dataset Information

Evaluation of the Efficacy and Safety of Vonoprazan in Patients with Nonerosive Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease: A Phase III, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Multicenter Study.

ABSTRACT: For many patients, current treatments do not adequately resolve heartburn in nonerosive reflux disease (NERD).To compare vonoprazan and placebo with respect to the frequency and severity of heartburn in patients with NERD.This Phase III, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, multicenter study included patients in Japan aged ?20 years with Grade N or M NERD and recurrent acid reflux symptoms. Patients were blinded and randomized 1:1:1 to receive placebo or vonoprazan 10 mg or 20 mg. The primary efficacy outcome was the proportion of days without heartburn measured by patient scores during the 4-week treatment period.Eight hundred twenty-seven patients were randomized (placebo: n = 278, vonoprazan 10 mg: n = 278, and vonoprazan 20 mg: n = 271). Median proportion of days without heartburn was 7.4% (placebo), 10.3% (vonoprazan 10 mg), and 12.0% (vonoprazan 20 mg). Proportion of days without heartburn was not statistically significant between the vonoprazan and placebo groups (P = 0.2310 [10 mg] and P = 0.0504 [20 mg]). Mean severity of heartburn was significantly higher with placebo (median score = 1.070) than with vonoprazan 10 mg (median score = 0.990; P = 0.0440) and 20 mg (median score = 0.960; P = 0.0139). Patients whose symptoms improved at Week 2 experienced significantly increased proportion of days without heartburn and reduced mean severity of heartburn at Week 4 with vonoprazan compared with placebo (proportion of days without heartburn: P = 0.0004 [10 mg] and P = 0.0001 [20 mg] and mean severity: P < 0.0001 [10 mg] and P < 0.0001 [20 mg]). A significant difference in median proportion of days without heartburn was observed for vonoprazan 20 mg compared with placebo in patients with Grade M NERD. Incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events was 32.7% (placebo), 27.7% (vonoprazan 10 mg), and 28.0% (vonoprazan 20 mg).Vonoprazan at doses of 10 mg and 20 mg are not superior to placebo with respect to proportion of days without heartburn, whereas the mean severity of heartburn is lower with vonoprazan compared with placebo in patients with NERD. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01474369.

SUBMITTER: Kinoshita Y

PROVIDER: S-EPMC5238607 | biostudies-literature | 2016

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Evaluation of the Efficacy and Safety of Vonoprazan in Patients with Nonerosive Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease: A Phase III, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Multicenter Study.

Kinoshita Yoshikazu Y Sakurai Yuuichi Y Shiino Madoka M Kudou Kentaro K Nishimura Akira A Miyagi Takuya T Iwakiri Katsuhiko K Umegaki Eiji E Ashida Kiyoshi K

Current therapeutic research, clinical and experimental 20161221

<h4>Background</h4>For many patients, current treatments do not adequately resolve heartburn in nonerosive reflux disease (NERD).<h4>Objective</h4>To compare vonoprazan and placebo with respect to the frequency and severity of heartburn in patients with NERD.<h4>Methods</h4>This Phase III, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, multicenter study included patients in Japan aged ≥20 years with Grade N or M NERD and recurrent acid reflux symptoms. Patients were blinded and randomized 1:1 ...[more]

PMID: 28119763

Similar Datasets

Project description:It is unclear whether the benefits that some patients derive from complementary and integrative medicine (CIM) are related to the therapies recommended or to the consultation process as some CIM provider visits are more involved than conventional medical visits. Many patients with gastrointestinal conditions seek out CIM therapies, and prior work has demonstrated that the quality of the patient-provider interaction can improve health outcomes in irritable bowel syndrome, however, the impact of this interaction on gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is unknown. We aimed to assess the safety and feasibility of conducting a 2 x 2 factorial design study preliminarily exploring the impact of the patient-provider interaction, and the effect of an over-the-counter homeopathic product, Acidil, on symptoms and health-related quality of life in subjects with GERD.24 subjects with GERD-related symptoms were randomized in a 2 x 2 factorial design to receive 1) either a standard visit based on an empathic conventional primary care evaluation or an expanded visit with questions modeled after a CIM consultation and 2) either Acidil or placebo for two weeks. Subjects completed a daily GERD symptom diary and additional measures of symptom severity and health-related quality of life.There was no significant difference in GERD symptom severity between the Acidil and placebo groups from baseline to follow-up (p = 0.41), however, subjects who received the expanded visit were significantly more likely to report a 50% or greater improvement in symptom severity compared to subjects who received the standard visit (p = 0.01). Total consultation length, perceived empathy, and baseline beliefs in CIM were not associated with treatment outcomes.An expanded patient-provider visit resulted in greater GERD symptom improvement than a standard empathic medical visit. CIM consultations may have enhanced placebo effects, and further studies to assess the active components of this visit-based intervention are warranted.ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01915173.

Project description:Introduction: Gastroesophageal reflux-induced chronic cough (GERC) is one of the most common etiologies of chronic cough. Despite the growing prevalence and interest in GERC, no effective treatment is currently available. In our study, we used a combination of herbal medicines, Ojeok-san (OJS) plus Saengmaek-san (SMS), for the treatment of GERC. Methods: We conducted a pilot, randomized, placebo-controlled, parallel-arm, single-center clinical trial to assess the feasibility of our study protocol, as our study is the first herbal medicine trial for GERC. All enrolled participants were randomly assigned to either the intervention or placebo group in a 1:1 ratio and were administered trial drugs three times a day for 6 weeks, with an evaluation visit performed every 2 weeks for their efficacy and safety assessment until the follow-up visit (week 8). We evaluated the severity and frequency of cough, cough-specific quality of life, airway hypersensitivity, and reflux-related gastrointestinal symptoms, as well as pattern identification, to investigate the complex mechanisms of reflux cough syndrome. Results: A total of 30 participants were enrolled, and 25 completed the study at Kyung Hee University Korean Medicine Hospital from 26 December 2018 to 31 May 2021. OJS plus SMS significantly improved the cough diary score (CDS), cough visual analog scale, Korean version of the Leicester Cough Questionnaire, Hull Airway Reflux Questionnaire, and Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale after the treatment compared to the baseline. Notably, OJS plus SMS showed significant efficacy in the daytime and total CDS compared with the placebo. Only one adverse event was observed during the trial, and no serious adverse events occurred. Additionally, we achieved successful results in feasibility outcomes by exceeding the ratio of 80%. Conclusion: We confirmed the feasibility of our trial design and demonstrated the potential of OJS plus SMS in relieving the severity of cough and GI symptoms in GERC patients with safe and successful feasibility results. We anticipate that our study results will be used as the basis for further large-scale, well-designed, confirmatory trials to evaluate the safety and efficacy of OJS plus SMS in GERC. Clinical Trial Registration: [https://cris.nih.go.kr], identifier WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, Clinical Research Information Service [KCT0003115].

Project description:BACKGROUND:Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a major cause of chronic cough. GERD-induced chronic cough is difficult to diagnose because some patients do not complain of any gastrointestinal (GI) reflux symptoms. Although chronic cough due to GERD is highly prevalent, no effective treatment is currently available, especially for GERD-related cough without GI symptoms. Because the herbal medicines Ojeok-san and Saengmaek-san can effectively treat GERD and cough, we aim to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a combination of these components for relieving chronic cough due to GERD. METHODS/DESIGN:This is a study protocol of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, single-center pilot trial. After a 1-week run-in period, a total of 30 patients with GERD-induced chronic cough will be randomly allocated to an intervention group (n = 15) or a placebo group (n = 15). Participants will receive 5.76 g of Ojeok-san plus Saengmaek-san or a placebo three times per day for 6 weeks. The primary outcome measures, which are the frequency and severity of cough, will be recorded using a cough diary. The secondary outcome measures will include a cough visual analogue scale, the Leicester Cough Questionnaire (Korean version), the Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale, the Hull Airway Reflux (hypersensitivity) Questionnaire, the Pattern Identification for Chronic Cough Questionnaire, the Pattern Identification for Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease, and safety testing. Adverse events will also be reported. DISCUSSION:This will be the first clinical trial to explore the use of herbal medicines for GERD-related chronic cough, including patients without GI reflux symptoms. This study will provide useful evidence regarding the efficacy and safety of Ojeok-san plus Saengmaek-san treatment. In addition, this trial will offer a scientific basis for the combination of herbal medicines. This study will also provide important data for conducting a larger-scale clinical trial on GERD-induced chronic cough. TRIAL REGISTRATION:This trial has been registered with Clinical Research Information Service (CRIS) of South Korea (http://cris.nih.go.kr; registration number KCT0003115). Registered August 28, 2018.

Project description:Study objectivesTo evaluate the efficacy and safety of Dimdazenil, a novel partial positive allosteric modulator for GABAA receptor in adults with insomnia disorder.MethodsThis was a 2-week, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group phase III study of Dimdazenil. The primary efficacy outcome was total sleep time (TST) analyzed by polysomnography (PSG) on day 13/14. Latency to persistent sleep (LPS), sleep efficiency (SE), and wake after sleep onset (WASO) were analyzed in the same way by polysomnography (PSG). The other secondary outcomes including the average subjective sleep latency (sSL), subjective TST (sTST), subjective SE (sSE), subjective WASO (sWASO), and subjective number of awakenings (sNAW) were analyzed from sleep diary data, and the insomnia severity index (ISI) was also assessed. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were monitored throughout the study.ResultsA total of 546 participants with insomnia (age ≥18 years) were randomized (2:1), received treatment with an oral dose of Dimdazenil (2.5 mg) or placebo, and analyzed. Compared to baseline and placebo, Dimdazenil demonstrated significant improvements in PSG measures, increased TST (71.09, 31.68 minutes, respectively; both p < 0.001), increased SE (13.26%, 5.55%, respectively; both < 0.001), reduced WASO (49.67, 20.16 minutes, respectively; both p < 0.001), and reduced LPS (21.65 minutes, p < 0.001; 6.46 minutes, p = 0.023). Compared to placebo, Dimdazenil also improved key self-reported measures of sTST (18.33 minutes, p < 0.001), sWASO (14.60 minutes, p < 0.001), sSL (4.23 minutes, p < 0.001), sSE (2.97%, p < 0.001), and sNAW (0.29, p < 0.001). Participants treated with Dimdazenil reported a significant improvement in ISI. Dimdazenil was well tolerated. The majority of TEAEs were mild or moderate. There were no clinically relevant treatment-related serious AEs and no deaths.ConclusionsDimdazenil of 2.5 mg provided significant benefit on sleep maintenance and sleep onset in individuals with insomnia disorder versus placebo, with a favorable safety profile and was well tolerated.Clinical trial informationA multicenter, randomized, double-blind phase III clinical study evaluating the efficacy and safety of EVT201 capsules compared to placebo in patients with insomnia disorders (http://www.chinadrugtrials.org), with the number of CTR20201068.

Dataset Information

Evaluation of the Efficacy and Safety of Vonoprazan in Patients with Nonerosive Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease: A Phase III, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Multicenter Study.

Publications

Evaluation of the Efficacy and Safety of Vonoprazan in Patients with Nonerosive Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease: A Phase III, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Multicenter Study.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets