Dataset Information

Effect of Prescription Drug Coupons on Statin Utilization and Expenditures: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

ABSTRACT: Drug coupons are widely used, but their effects are not well understood.To quantify the effect of coupons on statin use and expenditures.Retrospective cohort analysis of IMS Health LRx LifeLink database.U.S. retail pharmacy transactions.Incident statin users who initiated branded atorvastatin or rosuvastatin between June 2006 and February 2013.Monthly statin utilization (pill-days of therapy), switching (filling a different statin), termination (failure to refill statin for 6 mo), and out-of-pocket and total costs.Of 1.1 million incident atorvastatin and rosuvastatin users, 2% used a coupon for at least one statin fill. At 1 year, compared with noncoupon users, those who used a statin coupon on their first fill were dispensed an equal number of monthly pill-days (23.7 vs 23.8), were less likely to switch statins (14.4% vs 16.3%), and were less likely to have terminated statin therapy (31.3% vs 39.2%). At 4 years, coupon users were more likely to have switched (45.5% vs 40.8%) and less likely to have terminated statin therapy (50.6% vs 61.1%) compared with noncoupon users. Those who used greater numbers of coupons were substantially less likely to switch and terminate statin therapies. Monthly out-of-pocket costs were lower among coupon than noncoupon users at 1 year ($9.7 vs $15.1), but total monthly costs were qualitatively similar ($115.5 vs $116.9). At 4 years, monthly out-of-pocket costs among coupon users remained lower ($14.3 vs $16.6) compared with noncoupon users. Sensitivity analyses supported the main results.Coupons for branded statins are associated with higher utilization and lower rates of discontinuation and short-term switching to other statin products.

SUBMITTER: Daubresse M

PROVIDER: S-EPMC5243177 | biostudies-literature | 2017 Jan

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Effect of Prescription Drug Coupons on Statin Utilization and Expenditures: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Daubresse Matthew M Andersen Martin M Riggs Kevin R KR Alexander G Caleb GC

Pharmacotherapy 20160828 1

<h4>Importance</h4>Drug coupons are widely used, but their effects are not well understood.<h4>Objective</h4>To quantify the effect of coupons on statin use and expenditures.<h4>Design</h4>Retrospective cohort analysis of IMS Health LRx LifeLink database.<h4>Setting</h4>U.S. retail pharmacy transactions.<h4>Participants</h4>Incident statin users who initiated branded atorvastatin or rosuvastatin between June 2006 and February 2013.<h4>Main outcomes and measures</h4>Monthly statin utilization (pi ...[more]

PMID: 27455456

Similar Datasets

Project description:Background: In 2013, the American College of Cardiology (ACC) and the American Heart Association (AHA) released a revised guideline on statin therapy initiation. The guideline included a 10-year risk calculation based on regression modeling, which made hand calculation infeasible. Compliance to the guideline has been suboptimal, as many patients were recommended but not prescribed statin therapy. Clinical decision support (CDS) tools may improve statin guideline compliance. Few statin guideline CDS tools evaluated clinical outcome.Objectives: We determined if use of a CDS tool, the statin macro, was associated with increased 2013 ACC/AHA statin guideline compliance at the level of statin prescription versus no statin prescription. We did not determine if each patient's statin prescription met ACC/AHA 2013 therapy intensity recommendations (high vs. moderate vs. low).Methods: The authors developed a clinician-initiated, EHR-embedded statin macro command ("statin macro") that displayed the 2013 ACC/AHA statin guideline recommendation in the electronic health record documentation. We included patients who had a primary care visit during the study period (January 1-June 30, 2016), were eligible for statin therapy based on the ACC/AHA guideline prior to the study period, and were not prescribed statin therapy prior to the study period. We tested the association of macro usage and statin therapy prescription during the study period using relative risk and mixed effect logistic regression.Results: Subjects included 11,877 patients seen in primary care, who were retrospectively recommended statin therapy at study initiation based on the ACC/AHA guideline, but who had not received statin therapy. During the study period, 125 clinicians used the statin macro command for 389 of the 11,877 patients (3.2%). Of the 389 patients for whom that statin macro was used, 108 patients (28%) had a statin prescribed during the study period. Of the 11,488 for whom the statin macro was not used, 1,360 (13%) patients received a clinician-prescribed statin (relative risk 2.3, p?<?0.001). Controlling for patient covariates and clinicians, statin macro usage was significantly associated with statin therapy prescription (odds ratio 2.86, p?<?0.001).Conclusion: Although the statin macro had low uptake, its use was associated with a greater rate of statin prescriptions (dosage not determined) for patients whom 2013 ACC/AHA guidelines required statin therapy.

Project description:PurposeTo report historical patterns of pharmaceutical expenditures, to identify factors that may influence future spending, and to predict growth in drug spending in 2021 in the United States, with a focus on the nonfederal hospital and clinic sectors.MethodsHistorical patterns were assessed by examining data on drug purchases from manufacturers using the IQVIA National Sales Perspectives database. Factors that may influence drug spending in hospitals and clinics in 2021 were reviewed-including new drug approvals, patent expirations, and potential new policies or legislation. Focused analyses were conducted for biosimilars, cancer drugs, generics, coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic influence, and specialty drugs. For nonfederal hospitals, clinics, and overall (all sectors), estimates of growth of pharmaceutical expenditures in 2021 were based on a combination of quantitative analyses and expert opinion.ResultsIn 2020, overall pharmaceutical expenditures in the United States grew 4.9% compared to 2019, for a total of $535.3 billion. Utilization (a 2.9% increase) and new drugs (a 1.8% increase) drove this increase, with price changes having minimal influence (a 0.3% increase). Adalimumab was the top drug in 2020, followed by apixaban and insulin glargine. Drug expenditures were $35.3 billion (a 4.6% decrease) and $98.4 billion (an 8.1% increase) in nonfederal hospitals and clinics, respectively. In clinics, growth was driven by new products and increased utilization, whereas in hospitals the decrease in expenditures was driven by reduced utilization. Several new drugs that will influence spending are expected to be approved in 2021. Specialty and cancer drugs will continue to drive expenditures along with the evolution of the COVID-19 pandemic.ConclusionFor 2021, we expect overall prescription drug spending to rise by 4% to 6%, whereas in clinics and hospitals we anticipate increases of 7% to 9% and 3% to 5%, respectively, compared to 2020. These national estimates of future pharmaceutical expenditure growth may not be representative of any particular health system because of the myriad of local factors that influence actual spending.

Project description:ObjectiveTo assess the association between long term prescription opioid treatment medically dispensed for non-cancer pain and the initiation of injection drug use (IDU) among individuals without a history of substance use.DesignRetrospective cohort study.SettingLarge administrative data source (containing information for about 1.7 million individuals tested for hepatitis C virus or HIV in British Columbia, Canada) with linkage to administrative health databases, including dispensations from community pharmacies.ParticipantsIndividuals age 11-65 years and without a history of substance use (except alcohol) at baseline.Main outcome measuresEpisodes of prescription opioid use for non-cancer pain were identified based on drugs dispensed between 2000 and 2015. Episodes were classified by the increasing length and intensity of opioid use (acute (lasting <90 episode days), episodic (lasting ≥90 episode days; with <90 days' drug supply and/or <50% episode intensity), and chronic (lasting ≥90 episode days; with ≥90 days' drug supply and ≥50% episode intensity)). People with a chronic episode were matched 1:1:1:1 on socioeconomic variables to those with episodic or acute episodes and to those who were opioid naive. IDU initiation was identified by a validated administrative algorithm with high specificity. Cox models weighted by inverse probability of treatment weights assessed the association between opioid use category (chronic, episodic, acute, opioid naive) and IDU initiation.Results59 804 participants (14 951 people from each opioid use category) were included in the matched cohort, and followed for a median of 5.8 years. 1149 participants initiated IDU. Cumulative probability of IDU initiation at five years was highest for participants with chronic opioid use (4.0%), followed by those with episodic use (1.3%) and acute use (0.7%), and those who were opioid naive (0.4%). In the inverse probability of treatment weighted Cox model, risk of IDU initiation was 8.4 times higher for those with chronic opioid use versus those who were opioid naive (95% confidence interval 6.4 to 10.9). In a sensitivity analysis limited to individuals with a history of chronic pain, cumulative risk for those with chronic use (3.4% within five years) was lower than the primary results, but the relative risk was not (hazard ratio 9.7 (95% confidence interval 6.5 to 14.5)). IDU initiation was more frequent at higher opioid doses and younger ages.ConclusionsThe rate of IDU initiation among individuals who received chronic prescription opioid treatment for non-cancer pain was infrequent overall (3-4% within five years) but about eight times higher than among opioid naive individuals. These findings could have implications for strategies to prevent IDU initiation, but should not be used as a reason to support involuntary tapering or discontinuation of long term prescription opioid treatment.

Project description:BackgroundStatin treatment can reduce atherosclerotic plaque as detected via invasive intracoronary methods. However, few studies have evaluated the effect of moderate-intensity statin therapy on carotid intraplaque neovascularization (IPN) using semiquantitative indices. This study thus aimed to assess the effect of statin on the carotid IPN of coronary artery disease with contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS).MethodsIn this noncontrol, retrospective, cohort study, 35 inpatients who underwent coronary angiography, serial CEUS, and laboratory evaluations were consecutively enrolled from June 2020 to December 2022 at the Department of Cardiology, Chinese PLA General Hospital. All patients were administered moderate-intensity statin during serial CEUS, and continuous and categorical assessment of IPN and maximum plaque height (MPH) of carotid plaque was performed. Patients with a target low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) <1.8 mmol/L at 12-month follow-up were compared with those who did not reach the LDL-C 1.8 mmol/L target.ResultsFrom baseline to 12-month follow-up, there were significant differences in the LDL-C levels between patients (2.71±1.29 vs. 1.35±0.83 mmol/L), those with 12-month follow-up LDL-C <1.8 mmol/L (2.58±1.24 vs. 1.08±0.52 mmol/L), and those with 12-month follow-up LDL-C ≥1.8 mmol/L (3.24±1.44 vs. 2.56±0.85 mmol/L) all P values <0.05, with decreases of 41%, 49%, and 11% from baseline, respectively. The mean MPH (12 months to baseline) decreased from 2.47±0.63 to 2.22±0.60 mm (P<0.05), and the IPN also decreased from 1.15±0.62 to 0.58±0.56, representing a reduction of 0.57±0.59 from baseline (P<0.001). In the LDL-C <1.8 mmol/L patients, there were significant differences between baseline and 12 months in MPH (2.37±0.56 vs. 2.03±0.52 mm; P<0.05) and IPN (1.32±0.77 vs. 0.54±0.63; P<0.05) compared with those with a follow-up LDL-C ≥1.8 mmol/L. Patients with a follow-up LDL-C <1.8 mmol/L, compared with those with a follow-up LDL-C ≥1.8 mmol/L, showed a significantly greater reduction in MPH (-0.34±0.46 vs. -0.13±0.39; P<0.05) and IPN (-0.79±0.63 vs. -0.57±0.79; P<0.05). Additionally, patients with carotid IPN regression showed a higher percent change in LDL-C compared with those without carotid IPN regression (-53.31±23.20 vs. -29.55±19.47; P<0.05).ConclusionsControlling the LDL-C to <1.8 mmol/L under moderate-intensity statin can stabilize and reduce carotid IPN as detected by the semiquantitative noninvasive CEUS.

Project description:PurposePrevious studies have suggested that cholesterol may influence thyroid function. Since statins are widely used for their cholesterol-lowering effect, we aimed to assess the association between statin use and thyroid function, and also to explore the role of the cholesterol-lowering effect in it.MethodsWe performed a retrospective cohort study derived from REACTION study. Eligible subjects receiving statin therapy were included in the statin group, and sex-, age-, total cholesterol (TC)-, and thyroid function-matched participants without lipid-lowering therapy were included in the control group. The median follow-up time was three years. Outcomes of thyroid function were evaluated at the end of follow-up. We used multivariable regression models to assess the association between statin use and outcomes of thyroid function, and also performed mediation analyses to explore the role of cholesterol in it.ResultsA total of 5,146 participants were screened, and 201 eligible subjects in the statin group and 201 well-matched subjects in the control group were analyzed. At the end of follow-up, TC and thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) levels in the statin group were lower than those in the control group (both p < 0.05), and the percentage of euthyroid subjects was higher in the statin group (88.06% vs. 76.12%, p = 0.002). The incidence rate of subclinical hypothyroidism (SCH) in euthyroid subjects was lower in the statin group (6.29% vs. 14.86%, p = 0.009), and the remission rate among subjects with SCH was higher in the statin group (50.00% vs. 15.38%, p = 0.008). In multivariable regression analyses, statin use was independently associated with lower TSH levels and higher odds to be euthyroid (OR 2.335, p = 0.004) at the end of follow-up. Mediation analyses showed the association between statin use and TSH levels were mediated by TC changes during follow-up.ConclusionStatin use was associated with benefits of thyroid function, and TC changes serve as a mediator of the association between statin use and TSH levels. Further studies are needed to clarify the possible underlying mechanism.

Dataset Information

Effect of Prescription Drug Coupons on Statin Utilization and Expenditures: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Publications

Effect of Prescription Drug Coupons on Statin Utilization and Expenditures: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets