Dataset Information

EGFR mutation detection in circulating cell-free DNA of lung adenocarcinoma patients: analysis of LUX-Lung 3 and 6.

ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND:In the Phase III LUX-Lung 3/6 (LL3/LL6) trials in epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation-positive lung adenocarcinoma patients, we evaluated feasibility of EGFR mutation detection using circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA) and prognostic and predictive utility of cfDNA positivity (cfDNA+). METHODS:Paired tumour and blood samples were prospectively collected from randomised patients. Mutations were detected using cfDNA from serum (LL3) or plasma (LL6) by a validated allele-specific quantitative real-time PCR kit. RESULTS:EGFR mutation detection rates in cfDNA were 28.6% (serum) and 60.5% (plasma). Mutation detection in blood was associated with advanced disease characteristics, including higher performance score, number of metastatic sites and bone/liver metastases, and poorer prognosis. In patients with common EGFR mutations, afatinib improved progression-free survival vs chemotherapy in cfDNA+ (LL3: HR, 0.35; P=0.0009; LL6: HR, 0.25; P<0.0001) and cfDNA- (LL3: HR, 0.46; P<0.0001; LL6: HR, 0.12; P<0.0001) cohorts. A trend towards overall survival benefit with afatinib was observed in cfDNA+ patients. CONCLUSIONS:Plasma cfDNA is a promising alternative to biopsy for EGFR testing. Detectable mutation in blood was associated with more advanced disease and poorer prognosis. Afatinib improved outcomes in EGFR mutation-positive patients regardless of blood mutation status.

SUBMITTER: Wu YL

PROVIDER: S-EPMC5243999 | biostudies-literature | 2017 Jan

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

EGFR mutation detection in circulating cell-free DNA of lung adenocarcinoma patients: analysis of LUX-Lung 3 and 6.

Wu Yi-Long YL Sequist Lecia V LV Hu Cheng-Ping CP Feng Jifeng J Lu Shun S Huang Yunchao Y Li Wei W Hou Mei M Schuler Martin M Mok Tony T Yamamoto Nobuyuki N O'Byrne Kenneth K Hirsh Vera V Gibson Neil N Massey Dan D Kim Miyoung M Yang James Chih-Hsin JC

British journal of cancer 20161222 2

<h4>Background</h4>In the Phase III LUX-Lung 3/6 (LL3/LL6) trials in epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation-positive lung adenocarcinoma patients, we evaluated feasibility of EGFR mutation detection using circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA) and prognostic and predictive utility of cfDNA positivity (cfDNA+).<h4>Methods</h4>Paired tumour and blood samples were prospectively collected from randomised patients. Mutations were detected using cfDNA from serum (LL3) or plasma (LL6) by a validat ...[more]

PMID: 28006816

Similar Datasets

Project description:BACKGROUND:Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) gene mutation is closely related to the EGFR-TKI target treatment and prognosis of lung adenocarcinoma patients. The mutation status of EGFR is limited by tissue detection. The purpose of this study was to investigate the difference of EGFR mutants in plasmacirculating cell-free DNA (cfDNA) obtained from patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in three groups: pre-therapy, after traditional chemotherapy and targeted therapy. The aim of this study was to analyze whether the plasma cfDNA could effectively determine the EGFR mutations and monitor the drug resistant gene T790M, as well as its prognostic prediction value in patients with targeted therapy. METHODS:ARMS (amplification refractory mutation system)-PCR was used to detect EGFR mutations in 107 (50 of pre-therapy, 29 after traditional chemotherapy and 28 after targeted therapy) cases of paired plasma and tumor tissue specimens, followed by comparing their concordance. The sensitivity, specificity and the prognostic value of plasma cfDNA detection were also observed. RESULTS:The total rate of EGFR mutation was 56% (60/107) in all plasma samples and 77.6% (83/107) in corresponding tumor tissues. Completely the same mutants and wild-type EGFR were found in 68.2% cases of paired specimens. The sensitivity of plasma cfDNA detection was 72.3% and the specificity was up to 100%. Patients were sub-categorized according to therapy. The results showed that the highest consistent rate of cfDNA and tumor tissues was found in the group of pre-therapy (74%, 37/50). Whereas, the lowest consistent rate was observed in the targeted therapy group (57.1%, 16/28). It indicated that the targeted treatment could change the EGFR status in plasma cfDNA. Further analyses on inconsistent cases in this group revealed that 50% of them were compound EGFR mutations with T790M. Thereby, it suggested that targeted therapy might induce the emergence of drug resistance gene T790M. This speculation was confirmed by survival analyses. Based on plasma cfDNA results, patients with T790M mutant had significantly worse progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). CONCLUSIONS:For EGFR testing, ARMS-PCR on plasma cfDNA is a promising methodology with the highest specificity and effective sensitivity. It is useful for EGFR testing in patients before treatment, especially the late-stage patients. Simultaneously, plasma cfDNA could be used to monitor the drug resistant mutation, T790M status and predict prognosis after targeted therapy.

Project description:IntroductionIn LUX-Lung 3 and LUX-Lung 6, afatinib significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS) versus chemotherapy in patients with tumors harboring common epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations (Del19/L858R) and significantly improved overall survival (OS) in patients with tumors harboring Del19 mutations. Patient-reported outcomes stratified by EGFR mutation type are reported.Patients and methodsLung cancer symptoms and health-related quality of life (QoL) were assessed every 21 days until progression using the EORTC Quality of Life Core Questionnaire C30 and its lung cancer-specific module, LC13. Analyses of cough, dyspnea, and pain were prespecified and included analysis of percentage of patients who improved on therapy, time to deterioration of symptoms, and change over time. Global health status (GHS)/QoL was also assessed. Analyses were conducted for all patients with tumors harboring Del19 or L858R mutations and were exploratory.ResultsCompared with chemotherapy, afatinib more commonly improved symptoms of, delayed time to deterioration for, and was associated with better mean scores over time for cough and dyspnea in patients with Del19 or L858R mutations. All three prespecified analyses of pain showed a trend favoring afatinib over chemotherapy. In both Del19 and L858R mutations, afatinib was also associated with improvements in GHS/QoL. Longitudinal analyses demonstrated statistically significant improvements in GHS/QoL for afatinib over chemotherapy for patients with tumors harboring Del19 mutations or L858R mutations.ConclusionsThese exploratory analyses suggest first-line afatinib improved lung cancer-related symptoms and GHS/QoL compared with chemotherapy in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer with tumors harboring common EGFR mutations, with benefits in both Del19 and L858R patients. When considered with OS (Del19 patients only) and PFS benefits, these findings substantiate the value of using afatinib over chemotherapy in these patient groups.

Project description:Background: There is limited data on the relative survival rate of first-line therapy of gefitinib, erlotinib (first-generation epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitor [EGFR-TKI]), and afatinib (second-generation EGFR-TKI) in patients with EGFR-mutated advanced lung adenocarcinoma in real-world data, especially in the Asian population. This study aimed to compare the relative survival rate of gefitinib, erlotinib, and afatinib in patients with EGFR-mutated advanced lung adenocarcinoma by real-world data in Taiwan. Methods: This retrospective cohort population-based study included untreated adult patients diagnosed with advanced lung adenocarcinoma who were identified in the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database between 2014 and 2017. The date of EGFR-mutated advanced lung adenocarcinoma diagnosis was referred as index date. This outcome evaluated overall survival (OS) and time to treatment failure (TTF) between gefitinib, erlotinib, and afatinib. Switching EGFR-TKIs or chemotherapy and new development of brain metastases were proxies of TTF. Estimated relative treatment effects on OS and TTF among EGFR-TKIs were adjusted by inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) in Cox proportional hazards model. Propensity score (PS) matched pair analyses were performed as sensitivity analyses. Results: The study cohort included 3,695 patients initiated with gefitinib, 3,310 with erlotinib, and 3,041 with afatinib. The mean age among the three treatment groups was 70.4 (±11.6), 66.8 (±11.6), and 64.3 (±11.4) years, and the female percentage was 70.4, 58.6, and 57.7%, respectively. Afatinib showed longer median OS than gefitinib (23.9 vs. 21.3 months; adjusted hazard ratio (aHR), 0.87; p < 0.001) and erlotinib (23.9 vs. 21.8 months; aHR, 0.87; p = 0.001). Consistent results were observed with TTF outcomes. For patients with brain metastases at diagnosis, afatinib showed similar OS with erlotinib (p = 0.917) but superior to gefitinib (p = 0.028). PS matching had similar results with IPTW adjustment in the study population. Conclusion: Afatinib as first-line therapy had better survival outcomes for EGFR-mutated advanced lung adenocarcinoma than gefitinib and erlotinib in the Taiwan population. Both erlotinib and afatinib demonstrated superior treatment effect in patients with initial brain metastases than gefitinib.

Dataset Information

EGFR mutation detection in circulating cell-free DNA of lung adenocarcinoma patients: analysis of LUX-Lung 3 and 6.

Publications

EGFR mutation detection in circulating cell-free DNA of lung adenocarcinoma patients: analysis of LUX-Lung 3 and 6.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets