Unknown

Dataset Information

0

Adaptive Randomization of Neratinib in Early Breast Cancer.


ABSTRACT: The heterogeneity of breast cancer makes identifying effective therapies challenging. The I-SPY 2 trial, a multicenter, adaptive phase 2 trial of neoadjuvant therapy for high-risk clinical stage II or III breast cancer, evaluated multiple new agents added to standard chemotherapy to assess the effects on rates of pathological complete response (i.e., absence of residual cancer in the breast or lymph nodes at the time of surgery).We used adaptive randomization to compare standard neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus the tyrosine kinase inhibitor neratinib with control. Eligible women were categorized according to eight biomarker subtypes on the basis of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) status, hormone-receptor status, and risk according to a 70-gene profile. Neratinib was evaluated against control with regard to 10 biomarker signatures (prospectively defined combinations of subtypes). The primary end point was pathological complete response. Volume changes on serial magnetic resonance imaging were used to assess the likelihood of such a response in each patient. Adaptive assignment to experimental groups within each disease subtype was based on Bayesian probabilities of the superiority of the treatment over control. Enrollment in the experimental group was stopped when the 85% Bayesian predictive probability of success in a confirmatory phase 3 trial of neoadjuvant therapy reached a prespecified threshold for any biomarker signature ("graduation"). Enrollment was stopped for futility if the probability fell to below 10% for every biomarker signature.Neratinib reached the prespecified efficacy threshold with regard to the HER2-positive, hormone-receptor-negative signature. Among patients with HER2-positive, hormone-receptor-negative cancer, the mean estimated rate of pathological complete response was 56% (95% Bayesian probability interval [PI], 37 to 73%) among 115 patients in the neratinib group, as compared with 33% among 78 controls (95% PI, 11 to 54%). The final predictive probability of success in phase 3 testing was 79%.Neratinib added to standard therapy was highly likely to result in higher rates of pathological complete response than standard chemotherapy with trastuzumab among patients with HER2-positive, hormone-receptor-negative breast cancer. (Funded by QuantumLeap Healthcare Collaborative and others; I-SPY 2 TRIAL ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01042379.).

SUBMITTER: Park JW 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC5259558 | biostudies-literature | 2016 Jul

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

Adaptive Randomization of Neratinib in Early Breast Cancer.

Park John W JW   Liu Minetta C MC   Yee Douglas D   Yau Christina C   van 't Veer Laura J LJ   Symmans W Fraser WF   Paoloni Melissa M   Perlmutter Jane J   Hylton Nola M NM   Hogarth Michael M   DeMichele Angela A   Buxton Meredith B MB   Chien A Jo AJ   Wallace Anne M AM   Boughey Judy C JC   Haddad Tufia C TC   Chui Stephen Y SY   Kemmer Kathleen A KA   Kaplan Henry G HG   Isaacs Claudine C   Nanda Rita R   Tripathy Debasish D   Albain Kathy S KS   Edmiston Kirsten K KK   Elias Anthony D AD   Northfelt Donald W DW   Pusztai Lajos L   Moulder Stacy L SL   Lang Julie E JE   Viscusi Rebecca K RK   Euhus David M DM   Haley Barbara B BB   Khan Qamar J QJ   Wood William C WC   Melisko Michelle M   Schwab Richard R   Helsten Teresa T   Lyandres Julia J   Davis Sarah E SE   Hirst Gillian L GL   Sanil Ashish A   Esserman Laura J LJ   Berry Donald A DA  

The New England journal of medicine 20160701 1


<h4>Background</h4>The heterogeneity of breast cancer makes identifying effective therapies challenging. The I-SPY 2 trial, a multicenter, adaptive phase 2 trial of neoadjuvant therapy for high-risk clinical stage II or III breast cancer, evaluated multiple new agents added to standard chemotherapy to assess the effects on rates of pathological complete response (i.e., absence of residual cancer in the breast or lymph nodes at the time of surgery).<h4>Methods</h4>We used adaptive randomization t  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC5259561 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5513878 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC3858548 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8740082 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7398757 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC4467661 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC4981294 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6425946 | biostudies-literature