Dataset Information

Genotype influence in responses to therapy for atrial fibrillation.

ABSTRACT: INTRODUCTION:Over the last decade, tremendous progress has been made in defining the genetic architecture of atrial fibrillation (AF). This has in part been driven by poor understanding of the pathophysiology of AF, limitations of current therapies and failure to target therapies to the underlying mechanisms. AREAS COVERED:Genetic approaches to AF have identified mutations encoding cardiac ion channels, and signaling proteins linked with AF and genome-wide association studies have uncovered common genetic variants modulating AF risk. These studies have provided important insights into the underlying mechanisms of AF and defined responses to therapies. Common AF-risk alleles at the chromosome 4q25 locus modulate response to antiarrhythmic drugs, electrical cardioversion and catheter ablation. While the translation of these discoveries to the bedside care of individual patients has been limited, emerging evidence supports the hypothesis that genotype-directed approaches that target the underlying mechanisms of AF may not only improve therapeutic efficacy but also minimize adverse effects. Expert commentary: There is an urgent need for randomized controlled trials that are genotype-based for the treatment of AF. Nonetheless, emerging data suggest that selecting therapies for AF that are genotype-directed may soon be upon us.

SUBMITTER: Huang H

PROVIDER: S-EPMC5260484 | biostudies-literature | 2016 Oct

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Genotype influence in responses to therapy for atrial fibrillation.

Huang Henry H Darbar Dawood D

Expert review of cardiovascular therapy 20160715 10

<h4>Introduction</h4>Over the last decade, tremendous progress has been made in defining the genetic architecture of atrial fibrillation (AF). This has in part been driven by poor understanding of the pathophysiology of AF, limitations of current therapies and failure to target therapies to the underlying mechanisms.<h4>Areas covered</h4>Genetic approaches to AF have identified mutations encoding cardiac ion channels, and signaling proteins linked with AF and genome-wide association studies have ...[more]

PMID: 27409154

Similar Datasets

Project description:AimsInfluence of atrial fibrillation (AF) type on outcomes seen with catheter ablation vs. drug therapy is incompletely understood. This study assesses the impact of AF type on treatment outcomes in the Catheter Ablation vs. Antiarrhythmic Drug Therapy for Atrial Fibrillation Trial (CABANA).Methods and resultsCABANA randomized 2204 patients ≥65 years old or <65 with at least one risk factor for stroke to catheter ablation or drug therapy. Of these, 946 (42.9%) had paroxysmal AF (PAF), 1042 (47.3%) had persistent AF (PersAF), and 215 (9.8%) had long-standing persistent AF (LSPAF) at baseline. The primary endpoint was a composite of death, disabling stroke, serious bleeding, or cardiac arrest. Symptoms were measured with the Mayo AF-Specific Symptom Inventory (MAFSI), and quality of life was measured with the Atrial Fibrillation Effect on Quality of Life (AFEQT). Comparisons are reported by intention to treat. Compared with drug therapy alone, catheter ablation produced a 19% relative risk reduction in the primary endpoint for PAF {adjusted hazard ratio [aHR]: 0.81 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.50, 1.30]}, and a 17% relative reduction for PersAF (aHR: 0.83, 95% CI: 0.56, 1.22). For LSPAF, the ablation relative effect was a 7% reduction (aHR: 0.93, 95% CI: 0.36, 2.44). Ablation was more effective than drug therapy at reducing first AF recurrence in all AF types: by 51% for PAF (aHR: 0.49, 95% CI: 0.39, 0.62), by 47% for PersAF (aHR: 0.53, 95% CI: 0.43,0.65), and by 36% for LSPAF (aHR 0.64, 95% CI 0.41,1.00). Ablation was associated with greater improvement in symptoms, with the mean difference between groups in the MAFSI frequency score favouring ablation over 5 years of follow-up in all subgroups: PAF had a clinically significant -1.9-point difference (95% CI: -1.2 to -2.6); PersAF a -0.9 difference (95% CI: -0.2 to -1.6); LSPAF a clinically significant difference of -1.6 points (95% CI: -0.1 to -3.1). Ablation was also associated with greater improvement in quality of life in all subgroups, with the AFEQT overall score in PAF patients showing a clinically significant 5.3-point improvement (95% CI: 3.3 to 7.3) over drug therapy alone over 5 years of follow-up, PersAF a 1.7-point difference (95% CI: 0.0 to 3.7), and LSPAF a 3.1-point difference (95% CI: -1.6 to 7.8).ConclusionPrognostic treatment effects of catheter ablation compared with drug therapy on the primary and major secondary clinical endpoints did not differ consequentially by AF subtype. With regard to decreases in AF recurrence and improving quality of life, ablation was more effective than drug therapy in all three AF type subgroups.Clinicaltrials.gov identifierNCT00911508.

Dataset Information

Genotype influence in responses to therapy for atrial fibrillation.

Publications

Genotype influence in responses to therapy for atrial fibrillation.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets