Dataset Information

Identifying Older Adults with Serious Illness: A Critical Step toward Improving the Value of Health Care.

ABSTRACT: To create and test three prospective, increasingly restrictive definitions of serious illness.Health and Retirement Study, 2000-2012.We evaluated subjects' 1-year outcomes from the interview date when they first met each definition: (A) one or more severe medical conditions (Condition) and/or receiving assistance with activities of daily living (Functional Limitation); (B) Condition and/or Functional Limitation and hospital admission in the last 12 months and/or residing in a nursing home (Utilization); and (C) Condition and Functional Limitation and Utilization. Definitions are increasingly restrictive, but not mutually exclusive.Of 11,577 eligible subjects, 5,297 met definition A; 3,151 definition B; and 1,447 definition C.One-year outcomes were as follows: hospitalization 33 percent (A), 44 percent (B), 47 percent (C); total average Medicare costs $20,566 (A), $26,349 (B), and $30,828 (C); and mortality 13 percent (A), 19 percent (B), 28 percent (C). In comparison, among those meeting no definition, 12 percent had hospitalizations, total Medicare costs averaged $7,789, and 2 percent died.Prospective identification of older adults with serious illness is feasible using clinically accessible criteria and may be a critical step toward improving health care value. These definitions may aid clinicians and health systems in targeting patients who could benefit from additional services.

SUBMITTER: Kelley AS

PROVIDER: S-EPMC5264106 | biostudies-literature | 2017 Feb

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Identifying Older Adults with Serious Illness: A Critical Step toward Improving the Value of Health Care.

Kelley Amy S AS Covinsky Kenneth E KE Gorges Rebecca J RJ McKendrick Karen K Bollens-Lund Evan E Morrison R Sean RS Ritchie Christine S CS

Health services research 20160318 1

<h4>Objective</h4>To create and test three prospective, increasingly restrictive definitions of serious illness.<h4>Data sources</h4>Health and Retirement Study, 2000-2012.<h4>Study design</h4>We evaluated subjects' 1-year outcomes from the interview date when they first met each definition: (A) one or more severe medical conditions (Condition) and/or receiving assistance with activities of daily living (Functional Limitation); (B) Condition and/or Functional Limitation and hospital admission in ...[more]

PMID: 26990009

Similar Datasets

Project description:OBJECTIVE:Community Partners in Care (CPIC) was a group-randomized study of two approaches to implementing expanded collaborative depression care: Community Engagement and Planning (CEP), a coalition approach, and Resources for Services (RS), a technical assistance approach. Collaborative care networks in both arms involved health care and other agencies in five service sectors. This study examined six- and 12-month outcomes for CPIC participants with serious mental illness. METHODS:This secondary analysis focused on low-income CPIC participants from racial-ethnic minority groups with serious mental illness in underresourced Los Angeles communities (N=504). Serious mental illness was defined as self-reported severe depression (≥20 on the Patient Health Questionnaire-8) at baseline or a lifetime history of bipolar disorder or psychosis. Logistic and Poisson regression with multiple imputation and response weights, controlling for covariates, was used to model intervention effects. RESULTS:Among CPIC participants, 50% had serious mental illness. Among those with serious mental illness, CEP relative to RS reduced the likelihood of poor mental health-related quality of life (OR=.62, 95% CI=.41-.95) but not depression (primary outcomes); reduced the likelihood of having homelessness risk factors and behavioral health hospitalizations; increased the likelihood of mental wellness; reduced specialty mental health medication and counseling visits; and increased faith-based depression visits (each p<.05) at six months. There were no statistically significant 12-month effects. CONCLUSIONS:Findings suggest that a coalition approach to implementing expanded collaborative depression care, compared with technical assistance to individual programs, may reduce short-term behavioral health hospitalizations and improve mental health-related quality of life and some social outcomes for adults with serious mental illness, although no evidence was found for long-term effects in this subsample.

Project description:ObjectiveCommunication about patients' values, goals, and prognosis in serious illness (serious illness communication) is a cornerstone of person-centered care yet difficult to implement in practice. As part of Serious Illness Care Program implementation in five health systems, we studied the clinical culture-related factors that supported or impeded improvement in serious illness conversations.MethodsQualitative analysis of semi-structured interviews of clinical leaders, implementation teams, and frontline champions.ResultsWe completed 30 interviews across palliative care, oncology, primary care, and hospital medicine. Participants identified four culture-related domains that influenced serious illness communication improvement: (1) clinical paradigms; (2) interprofessional empowerment; (3) perceived conversation impact; (4) practice norms. Changes in clinicians' beliefs, attitudes, and behaviors in these domains supported values and goals conversations, including: shifting paradigms about serious illness communication from 'end-of-life planning' to 'knowing and honoring what matters most to patients;' improvements in psychological safety that empowered advanced practice clinicians, nurses and social workers to take expanded roles; experiencing benefits of earlier values and goals conversations; shifting from avoidant norms to integration norms in which earlier serious illness discussions became part of routine processes. Culture-related inhibitors included: beliefs that conversations are about dying or withdrawing care; attitudes that serious illness communication is the physician's job; discomfort managing emotions; lack of reliable processes.ConclusionsAspects of clinical culture, such as paradigms about serious illness communication and inter-professional empowerment, are linked to successful adoption of serious illness communication. Further research is warranted to identify effective strategies to enhance clinical culture and drive clinician practice change.

Project description:ObjectivesTo examine the association between hospitalization, critical illness, and infection occurring during middle- and late-life and structural brain abnormalities in older adults.DesignProspective cohort study.SettingAtherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study.ParticipantsA community sample of adults who were 44 to 66 years of age at study baseline.MeasurementsActive surveillance of local hospitals and annual participant contact were used to gather hospitalization information (including International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, codes) on all participants over a 24-year surveillance period. Subsequently, a subset of participants underwent 3-Tesla brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to quantify total and regional brain volumes, white matter hyperintensity (WMH) volume, and white matter microstructural integrity (fractional anisotropy (FA) and mean diffusivity (MD) as measured using diffusion tensor imaging (DTI)).ResultsOf the 1,689 participants included (mean age at MRI 76±5), 72% were hospitalized, 14% had a major infection, and 4% had a critical illness during the surveillance period. Using covariate-adjusted regression, hospitalization was associated with 0.12-standard deviation (SD) greater WMH volume (95% confidence interval (CI)=0.00-0.24) and poorer white matter microstructural integrity (0.17-SD lower FA, 95% CI=-0.27 to -0.06; 0.16-SD greater MD, 95% CI=0.07-0.25) than no hospitalization. There was a dose-dependent relationship between number of hospitalizations, smaller brain volumes, and lower white matter integrity (p-trends ≤.048). In hospitalized participants, critical illness was associated with smaller Alzheimer's disease (AD) signature region (-1.64 cm3 , 95% CI=-3.16 to -0.12); major infection was associated with smaller AD signature region (-1.28 cm3 , 95% CI=-2.21 to -0.35) and larger ventricular volume (3.79 cm3 , 95% CI= 0.81-6.77).ConclusionsWhereas all-cause hospitalization was primarily associated with lower white matter integrity, critical illness and major infection were associated with smaller brain volume, particularly within regions implicated in AD.

Dataset Information

Identifying Older Adults with Serious Illness: A Critical Step toward Improving the Value of Health Care.

Publications

Identifying Older Adults with Serious Illness: A Critical Step toward Improving the Value of Health Care.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets