Dataset Information

Inability of shear-wave elastography to distinguish malignant from benign prostate tissue - a comparison of biopsy, whole-mount sectioning and shear-wave elastography.

ABSTRACT: AIM:This study was designed to assess the possible usefulness of shear-wave elastography in differentiating between benign and malignant tissue in prostate neoplasia. PATIENTS AND METHODS:A total of 120 prostate tissue samples were obtained from 10 patients treated by radical prostatectomy and investigated pre-operatively by ultrasound elastography followed by directed biopsy. After resection, whole-mount sectioning and histological examination was performed. The predictions based on shear-wave elastography were compared with biopsy and histological results. RESULTS:The comparison between the results of shear-wave elastography and those of biopsy was performed by receiver operating characteristic analysis, which suggested an optimum cut-off tissue elasticity value of 50 kPa, in agreement with earlier studies aimed at distinguishing between benign and malignant tissue. However, the diagnostic selectivity (and thus the diagnostic power) was poor (area under the curve 0.527, which hardly differs from the value of 0.500 that would correspond to a complete lack of predictive power); furthermore, application of this cut-off value to the samples led to a sensitivity of only 74% and a specificity of only 43%. An analogous comparison between the results of shear-wave elastography and those of whole-mount histology, which itself is more reliable than biopsy, gave an even poorer diagnostic selectivity (sensitivity of 62%, specificity of 35%). Meaningful association with Gleason score was not found for D'Amico risk groups (p = 0.35). CONCLUSIONS:The (negative) findings of this investigation add to the dissonance among results of studies investigating the possible value of shear-wave elastography as a diagnostic tool to identify malignant neoplasia. There is a clear need for further research to elucidate the diversity of study results and to identify the usefulness, if any, of the method in question.

SUBMITTER: Porsch M

PROVIDER: S-EPMC5269522 | biostudies-literature | 2016 Dec

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Inability of shear-wave elastography to distinguish malignant from benign prostate tissue - a comparison of biopsy, whole-mount sectioning and shear-wave elastography.

Porsch Markus M Görner Claudia C Wendler Johann Jakob JJ Liehr Uwe-Bernd UB Lux Anke A Siedentopf Sandra S Schostak Martin M Pech Maciej M

Journal of ultrasonography 20161230 67

<h4>Aim</h4>This study was designed to assess the possible usefulness of shear-wave elastography in differentiating between benign and malignant tissue in prostate neoplasia.<h4>Patients and methods</h4>A total of 120 prostate tissue samples were obtained from 10 patients treated by radical prostatectomy and investigated pre-operatively by ultrasound elastography followed by directed biopsy. After resection, whole-mount sectioning and histological examination was performed. The predictions based ...[more]

PMID: 28138406

Similar Datasets

Project description:Background Elastography is a promising way to evaluate tissue differences regarding stiffness, and the stiffness of the malignant breast lesions increased at the lesion margin. However, there is a lack of data on the value of the shear wave elastography (SWE) parameters of the surrounding tissue (shell) of different diameter on the diagnosis of benign and malignant breast lesions. Therefore, the purpose of our study was to evaluate the diagnostic performance of shell elasticity in the diagnosis of benign and malignant breast lesions using SWE. Methods Between September 2016 and June 2017, women with breast lesions underwent both conventional ultrasound (US) and SWE. Elastic values of the lesions peripheral tissue were determined according to the shell size, which was automatically drawn along the edge of the lesion using the following software guidelines: (1): 1?mm; (2): 2?mm; and (3): 3?mm. Quantitative elastographic features of the inner lesions and shell, including the elasticity mean (Emean), elasticity maximum (Emax), and elasticity minimum (Emin), were calculated using an online-available software. The receiver operating characteristic curves (ROCs) of the elastographic features was analyzed to assess the diagnostic performance, and the area under curve (AUC) of each elastographic feature was obtained. Logistic regression analysis was used to predict significant factors of malignancy, permitting the design of predictive models. Results This prospective study included 63 breast lesions of 63 women. Of the 63 lesions, 33 were malignant and 30 were benign. The diagnostic performance of Emax-3shell was the highest (AUC?=?0.76) with a sensitivity of 60.6% and a specificity of 83.3%. According to stepwise logistic regression analysis, the Emax-3shell and the Emin-3shell were significant predictors of malignancy (p?<?0.05). The AUC of the predictive equation was 0.86. Conclusions SWE features, particularly the combination of Emax-3shell and Emin-3shell can improve the diagnosis of breast lesions.

Project description:Background: We performed a network meta-analysis to compare the diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) and shear wave elastography (SWE) in differentiating benign and malignant lesions in different body sites. Methods: A computerized literature search of Medline, Embase, SCOPUS, and Web of Science was performed using relevant keywords. Following data extraction, we calculated sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (LR), negative LR, and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) for CEUS, and SWE compared to histopathology as a reference standard. Statistical analyses were conducted by MetaDiSc (version 1.4) and R software (version 3.4.3). Results: One hundred and fourteen studies (15,926 patients) were pooled in the final analyses. Network meta-analysis showed that CEUS had significantly higher DOR than SWE (DOR = 27.14, 95%CI [2.30, 51.97]) in breast cancer detection. However, there were no significant differences between CEUS and SWE in hepatic (DOR = -6.67, 95%CI [-15.08, 1.74]) and thyroid cancer detection (DOR = 3.79, 95%CI [-3.10, 10.68]). Interestingly, ranking analysis showed that CEUS achieved higher DOR in detecting breast and thyroid cancer, while SWE achieved higher DOR in detecting hepatic cancer. The overall DOR for CEUS in detecting renal cancer was 53.44, 95%CI [29.89, 95.56] with an AUROC of 0.95, while the overall DOR for SWE in detecting prostate cancer was 25.35, 95%CI [7.15, 89.89] with an AUROC of 0.89. Conclusion: Both diagnostic tests showed relatively high sensitivity and specificity in detecting malignant tumors in different organs. Network meta-analysis showed that CEUS had higher diagnostic accuracy than SWE in detecting breast and thyroid cancer, while SWE had higher accuracy in detecting hepatic cancer. However, the results were not statistically significant in hepatic and thyroid malignancies. Further head-to-head comparisons are needed to confirm the optimal imaging technique to differentiate each cancer type.

Project description:Objectives:The aim of the study was to compare elastographic means in parathyroid adenomas, using shear wave elastography and strain elastography. Methods:This prospective study examined 20 consecutive patients diagnosed with primary hyperparathyroidism and parathyroid adenoma, confirmed by biochemical assay, technetium-99 sestamibi scintigraphy, and pathology report, after parathyroid surgery. All patients were examined on conventional 2B ultrasound, 2D shear wave elastography, and strain elastography. We determined using 2D shear wave elastography (SWE) the elasticity index (EI) in parathyroid adenoma, thyroid parenchyma, and surrounding muscle and examined using strain elastography the parathyroid adenoma, and determined the strain ratio with the thyroid tissue and muscle tissue. Results:All patients had positive sestamibi scintigraphy and underwent surgery, with confirmation of parathyroid adenoma in all cases. The mean parathormone (PTH) value before surgery was 153.29?pg/ml (36.5, 464.8) and serum calcium concentration was 10.5?mg/dl (9, 11.5). We compared using 2D-SWE and strain elastography parathyroid adenoma with thyroid tissue and with surrounding muscle. The mean EI measured by SWE in parathyroid adenoma was 4.74?±?2.74?kPa and in thyroid parenchyma was 11.718?±?4.206?kPa (mean difference?=?6.978?kPa, p < 0.001), and the mean EI value in muscle tissue was 16.362?±?3.829?kPa (mean difference?=?11.622, p < 0.001). Using ROC analysis, we found that an EI below 7?kPa correctly identifies parathyroid tissue. We evaluated parathyroid adenomas using strain elastography by color mapping and strain ratio as a semiquantitative measurement; however, we could not find any statistical correlation comparing the strain ratio obtained from the parathyroid adenoma with the thyroid tissue (p=0.485). Conclusion:Ultrasound elastography is a helpful tool in identifying parathyroid adenomas. A cutoff value below 7?kPa can be used in 2D-SWE. Color maps in strain elastography without adding strain ratio can be used, parathyroid adenoma being identified as score 1 in the Rago criteria.

Dataset Information

Inability of shear-wave elastography to distinguish malignant from benign prostate tissue - a comparison of biopsy, whole-mount sectioning and shear-wave elastography.

Publications

Inability of shear-wave elastography to distinguish malignant from benign prostate tissue - a comparison of biopsy, whole-mount sectioning and shear-wave elastography.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets