Dataset Information

Design and rationale of Heart and Lung Failure - Pediatric INsulin Titration Trial (HALF-PINT): A randomized clinical trial of tight glycemic control in hyperglycemic critically ill children.

ABSTRACT: Test whether hyperglycemic critically ill children with cardiovascular and/or respiratory failure experience more ICU-free days when assigned to tight glycemic control with a normoglycemic versus hyperglycemic blood glucose target range.Multi-center randomized clinical trial.Pediatric ICUs at 35 academic hospitals.Children aged 2weeks to 17years receiving inotropic support and/or acute mechanical ventilation, excluding cardiac surgical patients.Patients receive intravenous insulin titrated to either 80-110mg/dL (4.4-6.1mmol/L) or 150-180mg/dL (8.3-10.0mmol/L). The intervention begins upon confirmed hyperglycemia and ends when the patient meets study-defined ICU discharge criteria or after 28days. Continuous glucose monitoring, a minimum glucose infusion, and an explicit insulin infusion algorithm are deployed to achieve the BG targets while minimizing hypoglycemia risk.The primary outcome is ICU-free days (equivalent to 28-day hospital mortality-adjusted ICU length of stay). Secondary outcomes include 90-day hospital mortality, organ dysfunction scores, ventilator-free days, nosocomial infection rate, neurodevelopmental outcomes, and nursing workload. To detect an increase of 1.25 ICU-free days (corresponding to a 20% relative reduction in 28-day hospital mortality and a one-day reduction in ICU length of stay), 1414 patients are needed for 80% power using a two-sided 0.05 level test.This trial tests whether hyperglycemic critically ill children randomized to 80-110mg/dL benefit more than those randomized to 150-180mg/dL. This study implements validated bedside support tools including continuous glucose monitoring and a computerized algorithm to enhance patient safety and ensure reproducible bedside decision-making in achieving glycemic control.

SUBMITTER: Agus MS

PROVIDER: S-EPMC5285511 | biostudies-literature | 2017 Feb

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Design and rationale of Heart and Lung Failure - Pediatric INsulin Titration Trial (HALF-PINT): A randomized clinical trial of tight glycemic control in hyperglycemic critically ill children.

Agus Michael Sd MS Hirshberg Ellie E Srinivasan Vijay V Faustino Edward Vincent EV Luckett Peter M PM Curley Martha Aq MA Alexander Jamin J Asaro Lisa A LA Coughlin-Wells Kerry K Duva Donna D French Jaclyn J Hasbani Natalie N Sisko Martha T MT Soto-Rivera Carmen L CL Steil Garry G Wypij David D Nadkarni Vinay M VM

Contemporary clinical trials 20161230

<h4>Objectives</h4>Test whether hyperglycemic critically ill children with cardiovascular and/or respiratory failure experience more ICU-free days when assigned to tight glycemic control with a normoglycemic versus hyperglycemic blood glucose target range.<h4>Design</h4>Multi-center randomized clinical trial.<h4>Setting</h4>Pediatric ICUs at 35 academic hospitals.<h4>Patients</h4>Children aged 2weeks to 17years receiving inotropic support and/or acute mechanical ventilation, excluding cardiac su ...[more]

PMID: 28042054

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundIn multicenter studies, tight glycemic control targeting a normal blood glucose level has not been shown to improve outcomes in critically ill adults or children after cardiac surgery. Studies involving critically ill children who have not undergone cardiac surgery are lacking.MethodsIn a 35-center trial, we randomly assigned critically ill children with confirmed hyperglycemia (excluding patients who had undergone cardiac surgery) to one of two ranges of glycemic control: 80 to 110 mg per deciliter (4.4 to 6.1 mmol per liter; lower-target group) or 150 to 180 mg per deciliter (8.3 to 10.0 mmol per liter; higher-target group). Clinicians were guided by continuous glucose monitoring and explicit methods for insulin adjustment. The primary outcome was the number of intensive care unit (ICU)-free days to day 28.ResultsThe trial was stopped early, on the recommendation of the data and safety monitoring board, owing to a low likelihood of benefit and evidence of the possibility of harm. Of 713 patients, 360 were randomly assigned to the lower-target group and 353 to the higher-target group. In the intention-to-treat analysis, the median number of ICU-free days did not differ significantly between the lower-target group and the higher-target group (19.4 days [interquartile range {IQR}, 0 to 24.2] and 19.4 days [IQR, 6.7 to 23.9], respectively; P=0.58). In per-protocol analyses, the median time-weighted average glucose level was significantly lower in the lower-target group (109 mg per deciliter [IQR, 102 to 118]; 6.1 mmol per liter [IQR, 5.7 to 6.6]) than in the higher-target group (123 mg per deciliter [IQR, 108 to 142]; 6.8 mmol per liter [IQR, 6.0 to 7.9]; P<0.001). Patients in the lower-target group also had higher rates of health care-associated infections than those in the higher-target group (12 of 349 patients [3.4%] vs. 4 of 349 [1.1%], P=0.04), as well as higher rates of severe hypoglycemia, defined as a blood glucose level below 40 mg per deciliter (2.2 mmol per liter) (18 patients [5.2%] vs. 7 [2.0%], P=0.03). No significant differences were observed in mortality, severity of organ dysfunction, or the number of ventilator-free days.ConclusionsCritically ill children with hyperglycemia did not benefit from tight glycemic control targeted to a blood glucose level of 80 to 110 mg per deciliter, as compared with a level of 150 to 180 mg per deciliter. (Funded by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute and others; HALF-PINT ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01565941 .).

Project description:BackgroundCritically ill patients often present increased insulin resistance and stress-induced hyperglycemia. Tight glycemic control aims to reduce blood glucose (BG) levels and variability while ensuring safety from hypoglycemia. This paper presents the results of the second Belgian clinical trial using the customizable STAR framework in a target-to-range control approach. The main objective is reducing measurement frequency while maintaining performance and safety of the glycemic control.MethodsThe STAR-Liege 2 (SL2) protocol targeted the 100-140 mg/dL glycemic band and offered 2-hourly and 3-hourly interventions. Only insulin rates were adjusted, and nutrition inputs were left to the attending clinicians. This protocol restricted the forecasted risk of BG?<?90 mg/dL to a 5% level using a stochastic model of insulin sensitivity to assess patient-specific responses to insulin and its future likely variability to optimize insulin interventions. The clinical trial was performed at the Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Liege and included 9 patients. Results are compared to 24-hour pre-trial and 24-hour post-trial, but also to the results of the first pilot trial performed in Liege, STAR-Liege 1 (SL1). This trial was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Medical Faculty of the University of Liege (Liege, Belgium).ResultsDuring the SL2 trial, 91 measurements were taken over 194 hours. BG levels were tightly distributed: 54.9% of BG within 100-140 mg/dL, 40.7% were???140 mg/dL and 4.4% were?<?100 mg/dL with no BG?<?70 mg/dL. Comparing these results with 24-hour pre-trial and post-trial shows that SL2 reduced high and low BG levels and reduced glycemic variability. Nurses selected 3-hourly measurement only 5 of 16 times and overrode 12% of 91 recommended interventions (35% increased insulin rates and 65% decreased insulin rates). SL1 and SL2 present similar BG levels distribution (p?>?0.05) with significantly reduced measurement frequency for SL2 (p?<?0.05).ConclusionsThe SL2 protocol succeeded in reducing clinical workload while maintaining safety and effectiveness of the glycemic control. SL2 was also shown to be safer and tighter than hospital control. Overall results validate the efficacy of significantly customizing the STAR framework.

Project description:BackgroundThe use of electronic clinical decision support (CDS) systems for pediatric critical care trials is rare. We sought to describe in detail the use of a CDS tool (Children's Hospital Euglycemia for Kids Spreadsheet [CHECKS]), for the management of hyperglycemia during the 32 multicenter Heart And Lung Failure-Pediatric Insulin Titration trial.Research questionIn critically ill pediatric patients who were treated with CHECKS, how was user compliance associated with outcomes; and what patient and clinician factors might account for the observed differences in CHECKS compliance?Study design and methodsDuring an observational retrospective study of compliance with a CDS tool used during a prospective randomized controlled trial, we compared patients with high and low CHECKS compliance. We investigated the association between compliance and blood glucose metrics. We describe CHECKS and use a computer interface analysis framework (the user, function, representation, and task analysis framework) to categorize user interactions. We discuss implications for future randomized controlled trials.ResultsOver a 4.5-year period, 658 of 698 children were treated with the CHECKS protocol for ≥24 hours with a median of 119 recommendations per patient. Compliance per patient was high (median, 99.5%), with only 30 patients having low compliance (<90%). Patients with low compliance were from 16 of 32 sites, younger (P = .02), and less likely to be on inotropic support (P = .04). They were more likely to be have been assigned randomly to the lower blood glucose target (80% vs 48%; P < .001) and to have spent a shorter time (53% vs 75%; P < .001) at the blood glucose target. Overrides (classified by the user, function, representation, and task analysis framework), were largely (89%) due to the user with patient factors contributing 29% of the time.InterpretationThe use of CHECKS for the Heart And Lung Failure-Pediatric Insulin Titration trial resulted in a highly reproducible and explicit method for the management of hyperglycemia in critically ill children across varied environments. CDS systems represent an important mechanism for conducting explicit complex pediatric critical care trials.Clinical trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01565941, registered March 29 2012; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01565941?term=HALF-PINT&draw=2&rank=1.

Project description:BackgroundIt remains controversial whether critical illness-related hyperglycemia should be treated or not, since randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have shown context-dependent outcome effects. Whereas pioneer RCTs found improved outcome by normalizing blood glucose in patients receiving early parenteral nutrition (PN), a multicenter RCT revealed increased mortality in patients not receiving early PN. Although withholding early PN has become the feeding standard, the multicenter RCT showing harm by tight glucose control in this context has been criticized for its potentially unreliable glucose control protocol. We hypothesize that tight glucose control is effective and safe using a validated protocol in adult critically ill patients not receiving early PN.MethodsThe TGC-fast study is an investigator-initiated, multicenter RCT. Patients unable to eat, with need for arterial and central venous line and without therapy restriction, are randomized upon ICU admission to tight (80-110 mg/dl) or liberal glucose control (only initiating insulin when hyperglycemia >215 mg/dl, and then targeting 180-215 mg/dl). Glucose measurements are performed on arterial blood by a blood gas analyzer, and if needed, insulin is only administered continuously through a central venous line. If the arterial line is no longer needed, glucose is measured on capillary blood. In the intervention group, tight control is guided by the validated LOGIC-Insulin software. In the control arm, a software alert is used to maximize protocol compliance. The intervention is continued until ICU discharge, until the patient is able to eat or no longer in need of a central venous line, whatever comes first. The study is powered to detect, with at least 80% power and a 5% alpha error rate, a 1-day difference in ICU dependency (primary endpoint), and a 1.5% increase in hospital mortality (safety endpoint), for which 9230 patients need to be included. Secondary endpoints include acute and long-term morbidity and mortality, and healthcare costs. Biological samples are collected to study potential mechanisms of organ protection.DiscussionThe ideal glucose target for critically ill patients remains debated. The trial will inform physicians on the optimal glucose control strategy in adult critically ill patients not receiving early PN.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT03665207. Registered on 11 September 2018.

Project description:BackgroundRecent evidence suggests a potentially protective effect of increasing ketone body availability via accepting low macronutrient intake early after onset of critical illness. The impact of blood glucose control with insulin on circulating ketones is unclear. Whereas lowering blood glucose may activate ketogenesis, high insulin concentrations may have the opposite effect. We hypothesized that the previously reported protective effects of tight glucose control in critically ill patients receiving early parenteral nutrition may have been mediated in part by activation of ketogenesis.MethodsThis is a secondary analysis of 3 randomized controlled trials on tight versus liberal blood glucose control in the intensive care unit, including 700 critically ill children and 2748 critically ill adults. All patients received early parenteral nutrition as part of the contemporary standard of care. Before studying a potential mediator role of circulating ketones in improving outcome, we performed a time course analysis to investigate whether tight glucose control significantly affected ketogenesis and to identify a day of maximal effect, if any. We quantified plasma/serum 3-hydroxybutyrate concentrations from intensive care unit admission until day 3 in 2 matched subsets of 100 critically ill children and 100 critically ill adults. Univariable differences between groups were investigated by Kruskal-Wallis test. Differences in 3-hydroxybutyrate concentrations between study days were investigated by Wilcoxon signed-rank test.ResultsIn critically ill children and adults receiving early parenteral nutrition, tight glucose control, as compared with liberal glucose control, lowered mean morning blood glucose on days 1-3 (P < 0.0001) via infusing insulin at a higher dose (P < 0.0001). Throughout the study period, caloric intake was not different between groups. In both children and adults, tight glucose control did not affect 3-hydroxybutyrate concentrations, which were suppressed on ICU days 1-3 and significantly lower than the ICU admission values for both groups (P < 0.0001).ConclusionTight versus liberal glucose control in the context of early parenteral nutrition did not affect 3-hydroxybutyrate concentrations in critically ill patients. Hence, the protective effects of tight glucose control in this context cannot be attributed to increased ketone body availability.

Dataset Information

Design and rationale of Heart and Lung Failure - Pediatric INsulin Titration Trial (HALF-PINT): A randomized clinical trial of tight glycemic control in hyperglycemic critically ill children.

Publications

Design and rationale of Heart and Lung Failure - Pediatric INsulin Titration Trial (HALF-PINT): A randomized clinical trial of tight glycemic control in hyperglycemic critically ill children.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets