Dataset Information

A systematic review of geographical differences in management and outcomes for colorectal cancer in Australia.

ABSTRACT: Australia and New Zealand have the highest incidence of colorectal cancer (CRC) in the world, presenting considerable health, economic, and societal burden. Over a third of the Australian population live in regional areas and research has shown they experience a range of health disadvantages that result in a higher disease burden and lower life expectancy. The extent to which geographical disparities exist in CRC management and outcomes has not been systematically explored. The present review aims to identify the nature of geographical disparities in CRC survival, clinical management, and psychosocial outcomes.The review followed PRISMA guidelines and searches were undertaken using seven databases covering articles between 1 January 1990 and 20 April 2016 in an Australian setting. Inclusion criteria stipulated studies had to be peer-reviewed, in English, reporting data from Australia on CRC patients and relevant to one of fourteen questions examining geographical variations in a) survival outcomes, b) patient and cancer characteristics, c) diagnostic and treatment characteristics and d) psychosocial and quality of life outcomes.Thirty-eight quantitative, two qualitative, and three mixed-methods studies met review criteria. Twenty-seven studies were of high quality, sixteen studies were of moderate quality, and no studies were found to be low quality. Individuals with CRC living in regional, rural, and remote areas of Australia showed poorer survival and experienced less optimal clinical management. However, this effect is likely moderated by a range of other factors (e.g., SES, age, gender) and did appear to vary linearly with increasing distance from metropolitan centres. No studies examined differences in use of stoma, or support with stomas, by geographic location.Overall, despite evidence of disparity in CRC survival and clinical management across geographic locations, the evidence was limited and at times inconsistent. Further, access to treatment and services may not be the main driver of disparities, with individual patient characteristics and type of region also playing an important role. A better understanding of factors driving ongoing and significant geographical disparities in cancer related outcomes is required to inform the development of effective interventions to improve the health and welfare of regional Australians.

SUBMITTER: Ireland MJ

PROVIDER: S-EPMC5290650 | biostudies-literature | 2017 Feb

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

A systematic review of geographical differences in management and outcomes for colorectal cancer in Australia.

Ireland Michael J MJ March Sonja S Crawford-Williams Fiona F Cassimatis Mandy M Aitken Joanne F JF Hyde Melissa K MK Chambers Suzanne K SK Sun Jiandong J Dunn Jeff J

BMC cancer 20170202 1

<h4>Background</h4>Australia and New Zealand have the highest incidence of colorectal cancer (CRC) in the world, presenting considerable health, economic, and societal burden. Over a third of the Australian population live in regional areas and research has shown they experience a range of health disadvantages that result in a higher disease burden and lower life expectancy. The extent to which geographical disparities exist in CRC management and outcomes has not been systematically explored. Th ...[more]

PMID: 28152983

Similar Datasets

Project description:Background: Previous reviews of geographical disparities in the prostate cancer continuum from diagnosis to mortality have identified a consistent pattern of poorer outcomes with increasing residential disadvantage and for rural residents. However, there are no contemporary, systematic reviews summarizing the latest available evidence. Our objective was to systematically review the published international evidence for geographical variations in prostate cancer indicators by residential rurality and disadvantage. Methods: Systematic searches of peer-reviewed articles in English published from 1/1/1998 to 30/06/2018 using PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, and Informit databases. Inclusion criteria were: population was adult prostate cancer patients; outcome measure was PSA testing, prostate cancer incidence, stage at diagnosis, access to and use of services, survival, and prostate cancer mortality with quantitative results by residential rurality and/or disadvantage. Studies were critically appraised using a modified Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Results: Overall 169 studies met the inclusion criteria. Around 50% were assessed as high quality and 50% moderate. Men from disadvantaged areas had consistently lower prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing and prostate cancer incidence, poorer survival, more advanced disease and a trend toward higher mortality. Although less consistent, predominant patterns by rurality were lower PSA testing, prostate cancer incidence and survival, but higher stage disease and mortality among rural men. Both geographical measures were associated with variations in access and use of prostate cancer-related services for low to high risk disease. Conclusions: This review found substantial evidence that prostate cancer indicators varied by residential location across diverse populations and geographies. While wide variations in study design limited comparisons across studies, our review indicated that internationally, men living in disadvantaged areas, and to a lesser extent more rural areas, face a greater prostate cancer burden. This review highlights the need for a better understanding of the complex social, environmental, and behavioral reasons for these variations, recognizing that, while important, geographical access is not the only issue. Implementing research strategies to help identify these processes and to better understand the central role of disadvantage to variations in health outcome are crucial to inform the development of evidence-based targeted interventions.

Project description:BackgroundCoronavirus disease (COVID-19) has been associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes. Due to the lack of effective treatments for COVID-19, it becomes imperative to assess the geographical differences and trends in the current clinical care and outcomes of COVID-19 in pregnant women.MethodsA PubMed search was performed to screen articles reporting therapeutics and outcomes of confirmed COVID-19 in pregnant women prior to August 27, 2020. We performed searches, quality assessments of eligible studies, extracted and reported data according to PRISMA guidelines. Meta-analyses and cumulative meta-analyses of proportions were performed for estimating each outcome and their pattern over time respectively.ResultsOne thousand two hundred thirty nine pregnant women with COVID-19 from 66 studies were analyzed. In case series analysis reflecting average-risk patients, the proportion of oxygen support, antibiotics, antivirals, and plasma therapy administration except for hydroxychloroquine was substantially higher in Asian studies (55, 78, 80, 6, and 0%) compared to the US (7, 1, 12, 0, and 7%) or European (33, 12, 14, 1, and 26%) studies, respectively. The highest preterm birth and the average length of hospital stay (35%, 11.9 days) were estimated in Asian studies compared to the US studies (13%, 9.4 days) and European studies (29%, 7.3 days), respectively. Even in case reports reflecting severe cases, the use of antivirals and antibiotics was higher in Asian studies compared to the US, Latin American, and European studies. A significant decline in the use of most therapeutics along with adverse outcomes of COVID-19 in pregnant women was observed.ConclusionsGeographical differences in therapeutic practice of COVID-19 were observed with differential rates of maternal and clinical outcomes. Minimizing the use of some therapeutics particularly antibiotics, antivirals, oxygen therapy, immunosuppressants, and hydroxychloroquine by risk stratification and careful consideration may further improve maternal and clinical outcomes.

Project description:BackgroundEsophageal cancer (EC) is associated with a poor prognosis, particularly so in Africa where an alarmingly high mortality to incidence ratio prevails for this disease.AimTo provide further understanding of EC in the context of the unique cultural and genetic diversity, and socio-economic challenges faced on the African continent.MethodsWe performed a systematic review of studies from Africa to obtain data on epidemiology, risk factors, management and outcomes of EC. A non-systematic review was used to obtain incidence data from the International Agency for Research on Cancer, and the Cancer in Sub-Saharan reports. We searched EMBASE, PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane Central from inception to March 2019 and reviewed the list of articles retrieved. Random effects meta-analyses were used to assess heterogeneity between studies and to obtain odds ratio (OR) of the associations between EC and risk factors; and incidence rate ratios for EC between sexes with their respective 95% confidence intervals (CI).ResultsThe incidence of EC is higher in males than females, except in North Africa where it is similar for both sexes. The highest age-standardized rate is from Malawi (30.3 and 19.4 cases/year/100000 population for males and females, respectively) followed by Kenya (28.7 cases/year/100000 population for both sexes). The incidence of EC rises sharply after the age of 40 years and reaches a peak at 75 years old. Meta-analysis shows a strong association with tobacco (OR 3.15, 95%CI: 2.83-3.50). There was significant heterogeneity between studies on alcohol consumption (OR 2.28, 95%CI: 1.94-2.65) and on low socioeconomic status (OR 139, 95%CI: 1.25-1.54) as risk factors, but these could also contribute to increasing the incidence of EC. The best treatment outcomes were with esophagectomy with survival rates of 76.6% at 3 years, and chemo-radiotherapy with an overall combined survival time of 267.50 d.ConclusionAfrica has high incidence and mortality rates of EC, with preventable and non-modifiable risk factors. Men in this setting are at increased risk due to their higher prevalence of tobacco and alcohol consumption. Management requires a multidisciplinary approach, and survival is significantly improved in the setting of esophagectomy and chemoradiation therapy.

Dataset Information

A systematic review of geographical differences in management and outcomes for colorectal cancer in Australia.

Publications

A systematic review of geographical differences in management and outcomes for colorectal cancer in Australia.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets