Unknown

Dataset Information

0

Impact of diabetes mellitus on clinical outcomes of pancreatic cancer after surgical resection: A systematic review and meta-analysis.


ABSTRACT:

Background and objective

Diabetes mellitus (DM) is a risk factor for pancreatic cancer but its impact on postoperative outcomes and long-term survival after cancer resection remains controversial. A meta-analysis of published studies was conducted to address this issue.

Methods

An extensive electronic search of four databases was performed for relevant articles. Data were processed for meta-analysis using Review Manager version 5.1.

Results

Seventeen observational studies involving 5407 patients were subjected to the analysis. Overall morbidity or any type of complications and mortality were comparable between diabetic and non-diabetic subjects. Overall DM has a significant negative impact on survival (risk ratio [RR], 1.24, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.05-1.45; P = 0.01). Stratification by the type of DM revealed that new-onset DM (<2 years duration, RR, 1.54, 95% CI, 1.24-1.91; P <0.001) but not long-standing DM (?2 years duration, RR, 1.74, 95% CI, 0.86-3.52; P = 0.12) was associated with reduced survival.

Conclusions

Diabetes mellitus does not affect perioperative outcomes in patients undergoing surgery for pancreatic cancer. However, new-onset DM confers a negative impact on survival of pancreatic cancer in patients undergoing surgical resection.

SUBMITTER: Lv X 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC5291503 | biostudies-literature | 2017

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

Impact of diabetes mellitus on clinical outcomes of pancreatic cancer after surgical resection: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Lv Xinghua X   Qiao Wenhui W   Leng Yufang Y   Wu Lupeng L   Zhou Yanming Y  

PloS one 20170203 2


<h4>Background and objective</h4>Diabetes mellitus (DM) is a risk factor for pancreatic cancer but its impact on postoperative outcomes and long-term survival after cancer resection remains controversial. A meta-analysis of published studies was conducted to address this issue.<h4>Methods</h4>An extensive electronic search of four databases was performed for relevant articles. Data were processed for meta-analysis using Review Manager version 5.1.<h4>Results</h4>Seventeen observational studies i  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC10090510 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5046218 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5300262 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC9131781 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC11367777 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7916110 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5512376 | biostudies-other
| S-EPMC5892773 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC11022131 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7348166 | biostudies-literature