Dataset Information

Participant-generated Cochlear Implant Programs: Speech Recognition, Sound Quality, and Satisfaction.

ABSTRACT: OBJECTIVE:To determine whether patient-derived programming of one's cochlear implant (CI) stimulation levels may affect performance outcomes. BACKGROUND:Increases in patient population, device complexity, outcome expectations, and clinician responsibility have demonstrated the necessity for improved clinical efficiency. METHODS:Eighteen postlingually deafened adult CI recipients (mean?=?53 years; range, 24-83 years) participated in a repeated-measures, within-participant study designed to compare their baseline listening program to an experimental program they created. RESULTS:No significant group differences in aided sound-field thresholds, monosyllabic word recognition, speech understanding in quiet, speech understanding in noise, nor spectral modulation detection (SMD) were observed (p?>?0.05). Four ears (17%) improved with the experimental program for speech presented at 45?dB SPL and two ears (9%) performed worse. Six ears (27.3%) improved significantly with the self-fit program at +10?dB signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and four ears (26.6%) improved in speech understanding at +5?dB SNR. No individual scored significantly worse when speech was presented in quiet at 60?dB SPL or in any of the noise conditions tested. All but one participant opted to keep at least one of the self-fitting programs at the completion of this study. Participants viewed the process of creating their program more favorably (t?=?2.11, p?=?0.012) and thought creating the program was easier than the traditional fitting methodology (t?=?2.12, p?=?0.003). Average time to create the self-fit program was 10?minutes, 10?seconds (mean?=?9:22; range, 4:46-24:40). CONCLUSIONS:Allowing experienced adult CI recipients to set their own stimulation levels without clinical guidance is not detrimental to success.

SUBMITTER: Dwyer RT

PROVIDER: S-EPMC5302051 | biostudies-literature | 2016 Aug

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Participant-generated Cochlear Implant Programs: Speech Recognition, Sound Quality, and Satisfaction.

Dwyer Robert T RT Spahr Tony T Agrawal Smita S Hetlinger Chris C Holder Jourdan T JT Gifford René H RH

Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology 20160801 7

<h4>Objective</h4>To determine whether patient-derived programming of one's cochlear implant (CI) stimulation levels may affect performance outcomes.<h4>Background</h4>Increases in patient population, device complexity, outcome expectations, and clinician responsibility have demonstrated the necessity for improved clinical efficiency.<h4>Methods</h4>Eighteen postlingually deafened adult CI recipients (mean = 53 years; range, 24-83 years) participated in a repeated-measures, within-participant st ...[more]

PMID: 27228018

Similar Datasets

Project description:ObjectiveThe aim of the present study was to investigate the pupillary response to word identification in cochlear implant (CI) patients. Authors hypothesized that when task difficulty (i.e., addition of background noise) increased, pupil dilation markers such as the peak dilation or the latency of the peak dilation would increase in CI users, as already observed in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired subjects.MethodsPupillometric measures in 10 CI patients were combined to standard speech recognition scores used to evaluate CI outcomes, namely, speech audiometry in quiet and in noise at +10 dB signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). The main outcome measures of pupillometry were mean pupil dilation, maximal pupil dilation, dilation latency, and mean dilation during return to baseline or retention interval. Subjective hearing quality was evaluated by means of one self-reported fatigue questionnaire, and the Speech, Spatial, and Qualities (SSQ) of Hearing scale.ResultsAll pupil dilation data were transformed to percent change in event-related pupil dilation (ERPD, %). Analyses show that the peak amplitudes for both mean pupil dilation and maximal pupil dilation were higher during the speech-in-noise test. Mean peak dilation was measured at 3.47 ± 2.29% noise vs. 2.19 ± 2.46 in quiet and maximal peak value was detected at 9.17 ± 3.25% in noise vs. 8.72 ± 2.93% in quiet. Concerning the questionnaires, the mean pupil dilation during the retention interval was significantly correlated with the spatial subscale score of the SSQ Hearing scale [r(8) = -0.84, p = 0.0023], and with the global score [r(8) = -0.78, p = 0.0018].ConclusionThe analysis of pupillometric traces, obtained during speech audiometry in quiet and in noise in CI users, provided interesting information about the different processes engaged in this task. Pupillometric measures could be indicative of listening difficulty, phoneme intelligibility, and were correlated with general hearing experience as evaluated by the SSQ of Hearing scale. These preliminary results show that pupillometry constitutes a promising tool to improve objective quantification of CI performance in clinical settings.

Project description:ImportanceMultiple studies have evaluated associations between post-cochlear implant (CI) speech recognition outcomes and patient-related factors. Current literature often appears equivocal or contradictory, so little is known about the factors that contribute to successful speech recognition outcomes with CIs.ObjectiveTo use a meta-analysis to pool data from the extant literature and provide an objective summary of existing evidence on associations of patient-related factors and CI speech recognition outcomes.Data sourcesA literature search was performed using PubMed, Scopus, and CINAHL databases in January 2019 using the following search terms: cochlear implant or cochlear implants or cochlear implantation and speech recognition or word recognition or sentence recognition. Studies of postlingually deafened adult CI recipients that reported word or sentence recognition scores were included.Study selectionInclusion criteria were postlingual adult CI recipients 18 years or older with word or sentence recognition scores at minimum 6-month postimplantation. Studies that included patients undergoing revision or reimplantation surgery were excluded.Data extraction and synthesisFollowing the Preferred Reporting Items for Systemic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, 1809 unique articles underwent review by abstract, and 121 articles underwent full-text review, resulting in 13 articles of 1095 patients for a meta-analysis of correlations. Random-effects model was used when the heterogeneity test yielded a low P value (P < .05).Main outcomes and measuresThe planned primary outcome was the pooled correlation values between postimplant speech recognition scores and patient-related factors.ResultsOf the 1095 patients included from the 13 studies, the mean age at implantation ranged from 51.2 to 63.7 years and the mean duration of hearing loss ranged from 9.5 to 31.8 years; for the 825 patients for whom sex was reported, 421 (51.0%) were women. A weak negative correlation was observed between age at implantation and postimplant sentence recognition in quiet (r = -0.31 [95% CI, -0.41 to -0.20]). Other correlations between patient-related factors and postimplant word or sentence recognition were statistically significant, but all correlations were absent to negligible (r = 0.02-0.27).Conclusions and relevanceGiven that most associations were weak, negligible, or absent, patient-related factors often thought to affect CI speech recognition ability offer limited assistance in clinical decision-making in cochlear implantation. Additional research is needed to identify patient-related and other factors that predict CI outcomes, including speech recognition and other important variables related to success with CIs.

Project description:ObjectivesThe primary objective of this study is to identify the biographic, audiologic, and electrode position factors that influence speech perception performance in adult cochlear implant (CI) recipients implanted with a device from a single manufacturer. The secondary objective is to investigate the independent association of the type of electrode (precurved or straight) with speech perception.DesignIn a cross-sectional study design, speech perception measures and ultrahigh-resolution computed tomography scans were performed in 129 experienced CI recipients with a postlingual onset of hearing loss. Data were collected between December 2016 and January 2018 in the Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands. The participants received either a precurved electrode (N = 85) or a straight electrode (N = 44), all from the same manufacturer. The biographic variables evaluated were age at implantation, level of education, and years of hearing loss. The audiometric factors explored were preoperative and postoperative pure-tone average residual hearing and preoperative speech perception score. The electrode position factors analyzed, as measured from images obtained with the ultrahigh-resolution computed tomography scan, were the scalar location, angular insertion depth of the basal and apical electrode contacts, and the wrapping factor (i.e., electrode-to-modiolus distance), as well as the type of electrode used. These 11 variables were tested for their effect on three speech perception outcomes: consonant-vowel-consonant words in quiet tests at 50 dB SPL (CVC50) and 65 dB SPL (CVC65), and the digits-in-noise test.ResultsA lower age at implantation was correlated with a higher CVC50 phoneme score in the straight electrode group. Other biographic variables did not correlate with speech perception. Furthermore, participants implanted with a precurved electrode and who had poor preoperative hearing thresholds performed better in all speech perception outcomes than the participants implanted with a straight electrode and relatively better preoperative hearing thresholds. After correcting for biographic factors, audiometric variables, and scalar location, we showed that the precurved electrode led to an 11.8 percentage points (95% confidence interval: 1.4-20.4%; p = 0.03) higher perception score for the CVC50 phonemes compared with the straight electrode. Furthermore, contrary to our initial expectations, the preservation of residual hearing with the straight electrode was poor, as the median preoperative and the postoperative residual hearing thresholds for the straight electrode were 88 and 122 dB, respectively.ConclusionsCochlear implantation with a precurved electrode results in a significantly higher speech perception outcome, independent of biographic factors, audiometric factors, and scalar location.

Dataset Information

Participant-generated Cochlear Implant Programs: Speech Recognition, Sound Quality, and Satisfaction.

Publications

Participant-generated Cochlear Implant Programs: Speech Recognition, Sound Quality, and Satisfaction.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets