Dataset Information

Comparative effectiveness of radiotherapy with vs. without temozolomide in older patients with glioblastoma.

ABSTRACT: It is unknown whether the addition of temozolomide (TMZ) to radiotherapy (RT) is associated with improved overall survival (OS) among older glioblastoma patients. We performed a retrospective cohort SEER-Medicare analysis of 1652 patients aged ?65 years with glioblastoma who received ?10 fractions of RT from 2005 to 2009, or from 1995 to 1999 before TMZ was available. Three cohorts were assembled based on diagnosis year and treatment initiated within 60 days of diagnosis: (1) 2005-2009 and TMZ/RT, (2) 2005-2009 and RT only, or (3) 1995-1999 and RT only. Associations with OS were estimated using Cox proportional hazards models and propensity score analyses; OS was calculated starting 60 days after diagnosis. Pre-specified sensitivity analyses were performed among patients who received long-course RT (?27 fractions). Median survival estimates were 7.4 (IQR, 3.3-14.7) months for TMZ/RT, 5.9 (IQR, 2.6-12.1) months for RT alone in 2005-2009, and 5.6 (IQR, 2.7-9.6) months for RT alone in 1995-1999. OS at 2 years was 10.1?% for TMZ/RT, 7.1?% for RT in 2005-2009, and 4.7?% for RT in 1995-1999. Adjusted models suggested decreased mortality risk for TMZ/RT compared to RT in 2005-2009 (AHR, 0.86; 95?% CI, 0.76-0.98) and RT in 1995-1999 (AHR, 0.71; 95?% CI, 0.57-0.90). Among patients from 2005 to 2009 who received long-course RT, however, the addition of TMZ did not significantly improve survival (AHR, 0.91; 95?% CI, 0.80-1.04). In summary, among a large cohort of older glioblastoma patients treated in a real-world setting, the addition of TMZ to RT was associated with a small survival gain.

SUBMITTER: Arvold ND

PROVIDER: S-EPMC5303537 | biostudies-literature | 2017 Jan

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Comparative effectiveness of radiotherapy with vs. without temozolomide in older patients with glioblastoma.

Arvold Nils D ND Cefalu Matthew M Wang Yun Y Zigler Corwin C Schrag Deborah D Dominici Francesca F

Journal of neuro-oncology 20161021 2

It is unknown whether the addition of temozolomide (TMZ) to radiotherapy (RT) is associated with improved overall survival (OS) among older glioblastoma patients. We performed a retrospective cohort SEER-Medicare analysis of 1652 patients aged ≥65 years with glioblastoma who received ≥10 fractions of RT from 2005 to 2009, or from 1995 to 1999 before TMZ was available. Three cohorts were assembled based on diagnosis year and treatment initiated within 60 days of diagnosis: (1) 2005-2009 and TMZ/R ...[more]

PMID: 27770280

Similar Datasets

Project description:The optimization of the management for elderly glioblastoma patients is crucial given the demographics of aging in many countries. We report the outcomes for a "real-life" patient cohort (i.e. unselected) comprising consecutive glioblastoma patients aged 70 years or more, treated with different radiotherapy +/- temozolomide regimens.From 2003 to 2016, 104 patients ??70 years of age, consecutively treated by radiotherapy for glioblastoma, were included in this study. All patients were diagnosed with IDH-wild type glioblastoma according to pathological criteria.Our patient cohort comprised 51 female patients (49%) and 53 male. The median cohort age was 75 years (70-88), and the median Karnofsky performance status (KPS) was 70 (30-100). Five (5%) patients underwent macroscopic complete resection, 9 (9%) had partial resection, and 90 (86%), a stereotactic biopsy. The MGMT promoter was methylated in 33/73 cases (45%). Fifty-two (50%), 38 (36%), and 14 (14%) patients were categorized with RPA scores of III, IV, and I-II. Thirty-three (32%) patients received normofractionated radiotherapy (60 Gy, 30 sessions) with temozolomide (Stupp), 37 (35%) received hypofractionated radiotherapy (median dose 40 Gy, 15 sessions) with temozolomide (HFRT?+?TMZ), and 34 (33%) HFRT alone. Patients receiving only HFRT were significantly older, with lower KPSs. The median overall survival (OS; all patients) was 5.2 months. OS rates at 12, 18, and 24 months, were 19%, 12%, and 5%, respectively, with no statistical differences between patients receiving Stupp or HFRT?+?TMZ (P?=?0.22). In contrast, patients receiving HFRT alone manifested a significantly shorter survival time (3.9 months vs. 5.9 months, P?=?0.018). In multivariate analyses, the prognostic factors for OS were: i) the type of surgery (HR: 0.47 [0.26-0.86], P?=?0.014), ii) RPA class (HR: 2.15 [1.17-3.95], P?=?0.014), and iii) temozolomide use irrespective of radiotherapy schedule (HR: 0.54 [0.33-0.88], P?<?0.02). MGMT promoter methylation was neither a prognostic nor a predictive factor.These outcomes agree with the literature in terms of optimal surgery and the use of HFRT as a standard treatment for elderly GBM patients. Our study emphasizes the potential benefit of using temozolomide with radiotherapy in a real-life cohort of elderly GBM patients, irrespective of their MGMT status.

Project description:Introduction Patients with glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) over age 65 represent nearly half of those diagnosed per annum. They have a different tumor markers profile, physiologic reserve, and a median survival as low as three to four months. An optimal treatment strategy in older GBM patients remains undefined, with many patients receiving radiation in 30 treatments over six weeks, a regimen based on trials originally excluding patients over age 70. Recent studies have suggested reducing the number of treatments to 10-15 over two to three weeks with similar efficacy. We present an elderly population of patients treated with six radiation treatments. Methods After IRB approval, we reviewed the electronic medical records of 20 consecutive patients over the age 60 at diagnosis with GBM, treated with maximally safe neurosurgical resection, and adjuvant hypofractionated radiation (HFRT) and temozolomide (TMZ) between 2012 and 2015. HFRT was given every other weekday for two weeks, in a total of six fractions (6 × 6 Gy to contrast-enhancing tumor +5 mm and 6 × 4 Gy to fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) +2 cm) with concurrent TMZ (75 mg/m2 daily), followed by adjuvant TMZ (150-200 mg/m2 in 5/28 days). The response was assessed using the Macdonald and Revised Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (RANO) criteria, radiology reports, physician notes, and tumor board consensus notes. Descriptive statistics, overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), toxicity, and steroid use were calculated and compared to the historical controls of patients treated with a six-week radiation regimen of 60 Gy in 30 fractions with TMZ. Results The median age at diagnosis was 70.5 years (range: 61 - 82 years). Median pre-radiation Karnofsky performance scale (KPS) was 60 (range: 40 - 90). The median preoperative maximum gross tumor diameter on MRI was 3.6 cm (range: 1.8 - 6 cm). Six patients (30%) had a gross total resection (GTR), eight (40%) had a subtotal resection (STR), and six (30%) had biopsy only. The median progression-free survival was five months (95% (confidence interval) CI: 2.8, 16.4) and median OS of 14 months (95% CI: 5.0, upper limit not estimable). Of the 19 patients tested for isocitrate dehydrogenase-1 (IDH), 100% were negative. Of the eight patients who had MGMT methylation status results, four (50%) were positive for O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) methylation. In the 18 patients who completed radiation, the HFRT treatment was well tolerated without any Grade 3/4 acute toxicities. Conclusions The accelerated adjuvant course of HFRT with TMZ used for the elderly with GBM decreases radiation treatment days to six. It was well tolerated in patients over 60 years of age and provided similar OS, PFS, minimal toxicity, and decreased steroid usage compared to historical controls treated with six or even two to three weeks of radiotherapy.

Project description:ImportanceTumor-treating fields (TTFields) is an antimitotic treatment modality that interferes with glioblastoma cell division and organelle assembly by delivering low-intensity alternating electric fields to the tumor.ObjectiveTo investigate whether TTFields improves progression-free and overall survival of patients with glioblastoma, a fatal disease that commonly recurs at the initial tumor site or in the central nervous system.Design, setting, and participantsIn this randomized, open-label trial, 695 patients with glioblastoma whose tumor was resected or biopsied and had completed concomitant radiochemotherapy (median time from diagnosis to randomization, 3.8 months) were enrolled at 83 centers (July 2009-2014) and followed up through December 2016. A preliminary report from this trial was published in 2015; this report describes the final analysis.InterventionsPatients were randomized 2:1 to TTFields plus maintenance temozolomide chemotherapy (n = 466) or temozolomide alone (n = 229). The TTFields, consisting of low-intensity, 200 kHz frequency, alternating electric fields, was delivered (≥ 18 hours/d) via 4 transducer arrays on the shaved scalp and connected to a portable device. Temozolomide was administered to both groups (150-200 mg/m2) for 5 days per 28-day cycle (6-12 cycles).Main outcomes and measuresProgression-free survival (tested at α = .046). The secondary end point was overall survival (tested hierarchically at α = .048). Analyses were performed for the intent-to-treat population. Adverse events were compared by group.ResultsOf the 695 randomized patients (median age, 56 years; IQR, 48-63; 473 men [68%]), 637 (92%) completed the trial. Median progression-free survival from randomization was 6.7 months in the TTFields-temozolomide group and 4.0 months in the temozolomide-alone group (HR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.52-0.76; P < .001). Median overall survival was 20.9 months in the TTFields-temozolomide group vs 16.0 months in the temozolomide-alone group (HR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.53-0.76; P < .001). Systemic adverse event frequency was 48% in the TTFields-temozolomide group and 44% in the temozolomide-alone group. Mild to moderate skin toxicity underneath the transducer arrays occurred in 52% of patients who received TTFields-temozolomide vs no patients who received temozolomide alone.Conclusions and relevanceIn the final analysis of this randomized clinical trial of patients with glioblastoma who had received standard radiochemotherapy, the addition of TTFields to maintenance temozolomide chemotherapy vs maintenance temozolomide alone, resulted in statistically significant improvement in progression-free survival and overall survival. These results are consistent with the previous interim analysis.Trial registrationclinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00916409.

Project description:Background and Purpose: Glioblastomas are the most aggressive of all gliomas. The prognosis of these gliomas, which are classified as grade IV tumors by the World Health Organization (WHO), is poor. Combination therapy, including surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy has variable outcomes and is expensive. In light of rising healthcare costs, there are societal demands for the justification of medical expenses. Therefore, we calculated the cost-effectiveness of follow-up [18F] fluoroethyl-L-tyrosine ([18F] FET) positron emission tomography (PET) scans performed on patients with glioblastoma after surgery and before commencing temozolomide maintenance treatment. Materials and Methods: To determine the cost-effectiveness of follow-up [18F] FET PET procedures, we examined published clinical data and calculated the associated costs in the context of Belgian healthcare. We subsequently performed one-way deterministic sensitivity analysis and Monte Carlo analysis on the calculated ratios. Results: The decision tree based on overall survival rates showed that the number of non-responders identified using PET was 57.14% higher than the number of non-responders identified using conventional MRI. Further, the decision tree based on progression-free survival rates revealed a comparable increase of 57.50% non-responders identified. The calculated cost of two required PET scans per patient during the follow-up treatment phase was 780.50 euros. Two cost-effectiveness ratios were determined for overall survival and progression-free survival rates. Both of these calculations yielded very similar results: incremental cost-effectiveness ratios of 1,365.86 and 1,357.38 euros, respectively, for each identified non-responder. The findings of the sensitivity analysis supported the calculated results, confirming that the obtained data were robust. Conclusion: Our comparative study of conventional MRI and [18F] FET PET revealed that the latter is a valuable tool for predicting the treatment responses of patients with glioblastomas to follow-up temozolomide maintenance treatment while considering its cost-effectiveness. Thus, [18F] FET PET scans enable clinical outcomes to be predicted accurately and at a low cost. Moreover, given the robustness of the data in the sensitivity analyses, the level of certainty of this outcome is acceptable.

Dataset Information

Comparative effectiveness of radiotherapy with vs. without temozolomide in older patients with glioblastoma.

Publications

Comparative effectiveness of radiotherapy with vs. without temozolomide in older patients with glioblastoma.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets