Dataset Information

Effect of ethnicity on HbA1c levels in individuals without diabetes: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

ABSTRACT:

Aims/hypothesis

Disparities in HbA1c levels have been observed among ethnic groups. Most studies were performed in patients with diabetes mellitus (DM), which may interfere with results due to the high variability of glucose levels. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate the effect of ethnicity on HbA1c levels in individuals without DM.

Methods

This is a systematic review with meta-analysis. We searched MEDLINE and EMBASE up to September 2016. Studies published after 1996, performed in adults without DM, reporting HbA1c results measured by certified/standardized methods were included. A random effects model was used and the effect size was presented as weighted HbA1c mean difference (95% CI) between different ethnicities as compared to White ethnicity.

Results

Twelve studies met the inclusion criteria, totalling data from 49,238 individuals. There were significant differences between HbA1c levels in Blacks [0.26% (2.8 mmol/mol); 95% CI 0.18 to 0.33 (2.0 to 3.6), p <0.001; I2 = 90%, p <0.001], Asians [0.24% (2.6 mmol/mol); 95% CI 0.16 to 0.33 (1.7 to 3.6), p <0.001; I2 = 80%, p = 0.0006] and Latinos [0.08% (0.9 mmol/mol); IC 95% 0.06 to 0.10 (0.7 to 1.1); p <0.001; I2 = 0%; p = 0.72] when compared to Whites.

Conclusions/interpretation

This meta-analysis shows that, in individuals without DM, HbA1c values are higher in Blacks, Asians, and Latinos when compared to White persons. Although small, these differences might have impact on the use of a sole HbA1c point to diagnose DM in all ethnic populations.

SUBMITTER: Cavagnolli G

PROVIDER: S-EPMC5305058 | biostudies-literature | 2017

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Effect of ethnicity on HbA1c levels in individuals without diabetes: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Cavagnolli Gabriela G Pimentel Ana Laura AL Freitas Priscila Aparecida Correa PA Gross Jorge Luiz JL Camargo Joíza Lins JL

PloS one 20170213 2

<h4>Aims/hypothesis</h4>Disparities in HbA1c levels have been observed among ethnic groups. Most studies were performed in patients with diabetes mellitus (DM), which may interfere with results due to the high variability of glucose levels. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate the effect of ethnicity on HbA1c levels in individuals without DM.<h4>Methods</h4>This is a systematic review with meta-analysis. We searched MEDLINE and EMBASE up to September 2016. Studies pu ...[more]

PMID: 28192447

Similar Datasets

Project description:OBJECTIVE:To assess the effect of antihypertensive treatment on mortality and cardiovascular morbidity in people with diabetes mellitus, at different blood pressure levels. DESIGN:Systematic review and meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials. DATA SOURCES:CENTRAL, Medline, Embase, and BIOSIS were searched using highly sensitive search strategies. When data required according to the protocol were missing but trials were potentially eligible, we contacted researchers, pharmaceutical companies, and authorities. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA:Randomised controlled trials including 100 or more people with diabetes mellitus, treated for 12 months or more, comparing any antihypertensive agent against placebo, two agents against one, or different blood pressure targets. RESULTS:49 trials, including 73,738 participants, were included in the meta-analyses. Most of the participants had type 2 diabetes. If baseline systolic blood pressure was greater than 150 mm Hg, antihypertensive treatment reduced the risk of all cause mortality (relative risk 0.89, 95% confidence interval 0.80 to 0.99), cardiovascular mortality (0.75, 0.57 to 0.99), myocardial infarction (0.74, 0.63 to 0.87), stroke (0.77, 0.65 to 0.91), and end stage renal disease (0.82, 0.71 to 0.94). If baseline systolic blood pressure was 140-150 mm Hg, additional treatment reduced the risk of all cause mortality (0.87, 0.78 to 0.98), myocardial infarction (0.84, 0.76 to 0.93), and heart failure (0.80, 0.66 to 0.97). If baseline systolic blood pressure was less than 140 mm Hg, however, further treatment increased the risk of cardiovascular mortality (1.15, 1.00 to 1.32), with a tendency towards an increased risk of all cause mortality (1.05, 0.95 to 1.16). Metaregression analyses showed a worse treatment effect with lower baseline systolic blood pressures for cardiovascular mortality (1.15, 1.03 to 1.29 for each 10 mm Hg lower systolic blood pressure) and myocardial infarction (1.12, 1.03 to 1.22 for each 10 mm Hg lower systolic blood pressure). Patterns were similar for attained systolic blood pressure. CONCLUSIONS:Antihypertensive treatment reduces the risk of mortality and cardiovascular morbidity in people with diabetes mellitus and a systolic blood pressure more than 140 mm Hg. If systolic blood pressure is less than 140 mm Hg, however, further treatment is associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular death, with no observed benefit.

Project description:ObjectiveTo review the evidence of the association between performance in eight indicators of diabetes care and a patient's race/ethnicity and socioeconomic characteristics.Data sourceStudies of adult patients with type 2 diabetes in MEDLINE published between January 1, 2000, and December 31, 2018.Study designSystematic review and meta-analysis of regression-based studies including race/ethnicity and income or education as explanatory variables. Meta-analysis was used to quantify differences in performance associated with patient race/ethnicity or socioeconomic characteristics. The systematic review was used to identify potential mechanisms of disparities.Data collectionTwo coauthors separately conducted abstract screening, study exclusions, data extraction, and scoring of retained studies. Estimates in retained studies were extracted and, where applicable, were standardized and converted to odds ratios and standard errors.Principal findingsPerformance in intermediate outcomes and process measures frequently exhibited differences by race/ethnicity even after adjustment for socioeconomic, lifestyle, and health factors. Meta-analyses showed black patients had lower odds of HbA1c and blood pressure (BP) control (OR range: 0.67-0.68, P < .05) but higher odds of receiving eye or foot examination (OR range: 1.22-1.47, P < .05) relative to white patients. A high school degree or more was associated with higher odds of HbA1c control and receipt of eye examinations compared to patients without a degree. Meta-analyses of income included a handful of studies and were inconsistently associated with diabetes care performance. Differences in diabetes performance appear to be related to access-related factors such as uninsurance or lacking a usual source of care; food insecurity and trade-offs at very low incomes; and lower adherence among younger and healthier diabetes patients.ConclusionsPatient race/ethnicity and education were associated with differences in diabetes quality measures. Depending on the approach used to rate providers, not adjusting for these patient characteristics may penalize or reward providers based on the populations they serve.

Project description:IntroductionDiabetes mellitus has increased in prevalence worldwide and is causing an increasing burden on health services. The best patient outcomes occur with early diagnosis to prevent health complications. Glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) is used to assess glycaemic control over 3-6 months and inform clinical management. Point-of-care (POC) HbA1c devices can be used in community settings, independent of clinical laboratories. This review aims to evaluate how these devices have been implemented in community settings and what patient outcomes have been documented.Methods and analysisThis protocol follows the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis guidance. A systematic search was undertaken in October 2022, using the defined PICOS (population, intervention, comparison, outcomes, study type) statement to identify all relevant articles: CINAHL, Cochrane, PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science were searched (updated February 2023). Studies will be included if they report outcomes of community POC testing for HbA1c for people with diabetes or at risk of diabetes. We will review the PROSPERO database and trial registers.Title, abstract screening and full-text review will be carried out by two reviewers. The Cochrane risk-of-bias tool will be used to assess randomised studies and the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Quality Assessment tool for observational cohort and cross-sectional studies. Publication bias will be assessed visually with a funnel plot and statistical approaches if necessary. If a group of sufficiently comparable studies are identified, we will perform a meta-analysis applying a fixed or random effects model as appropriate. We will investigate heterogeneity using visual inspection of forest plots along with review of evaluative approaches such as Χ2 and the I2 statistic. Strength of evidence will be assessed using Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation.Ethics and disseminationEthics approval is not required for this literature review. The results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publication and conference presentations. Furthermore, this systematic review will be used to inform the design of a community pharmacy-based prediabetes intervention.Prospero registration numberCRD42023383784.

Dataset Information

Effect of ethnicity on HbA1c levels in individuals without diabetes: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Aims/hypothesis

Methods

Results

Conclusions/interpretation

Publications

Effect of ethnicity on HbA1c levels in individuals without diabetes: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets