Computed tomography myocardial perfusion vs ¹⁵O-water positron emission tomography and fractional flow reserve.

ABSTRACT:

Objectives

Computed tomography (CT) can perform comprehensive cardiac imaging. We compared CT coronary angiography (CTCA) and CT myocardial perfusion (CTP) with ¹⁵O-water positron emission tomography (PET) and invasive coronary angiography (ICA) with fractional flow reserve (FFR).

Methods

51 patients (63 (61-65) years, 80 % male) with known/suspected coronary artery disease (CAD) underwent 320-multidetector CTCA followed by "snapshot" adenosine stress CTP. Of these 22 underwent PET and 47 ICA/FFR. Obstructive CAD was defined as CTCA stenosis >50 % and CTP hypoperfusion, ICA stenosis >70 % or FFR <0.80.

Results

PET hyperaemic myocardial blood flow (MBF) was lower in obstructive than non-obstructive territories defined by ICA/FFR (1.76 (1.32-2.20) vs 3.11 (2.44-3.79) mL/(g/min), P?ConclusionCT myocardial attenuation density correlates with ¹⁵O-water PET MBF. CTCA and CTP can accurately identify obstructive CAD.

Key points

•CT myocardial perfusion can aid the assessment of suspected coronary artery disease. • CT attenuation density from "snapshot" imaging is a marker of myocardial perfusion. • CT myocardial attenuation density correlates with ¹⁵ O-water PET myocardial blood flow. • CT attenuation density is lower in obstructive territories defined by invasive angiography. • Diagnostic accuracy of CTCA+CTP is comparable to invasive angiography + fractional flow reserve.

SUBMITTER: Williams MC 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC5306314 | biostudies-literature | 2017 Mar

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature