Dataset Information

Isoprenaline versus nitroglycerine in head-up tilt test.

ABSTRACT:

Background

HUTT test is used in evaluation of syncope. Isoprenaline and isosorbide dinitrate are used to increase the sensitivity of the test. These drugs act by different mechanisms. We aimed to compare the results of isoprenaline with isosorbide dinitrate.

Methods and results

We studied 198 subjects referred for HUTT to our institute; those above the age of 35 years were not included in our study, because isoprenaline was not used commonly above this age; thus, only 90 subjects were analyzed. We found that isosorbide dinitrate resulted in more HUTT-positive results than isoprenaline by absolute risk difference of 26%; relative risk for positive isoprenaline was 60%, confidence interval 0.38-0.93, and P value of 0.03. There was no difference in frequency of types of responses, i.e. Type 1, Type 2, and Type 3 between passive testing, isosorbide dinitrate, and isoprenaline, confidence interval 1.53-2.02, and P value 0.71. Time to get positive response was highest for passive testing followed by ISO and ISDN; the mean was 16.85±7.00min, 9.85±5.84min, and 7.00±3.35min, respectively. Statistically, ISDN versus ISO time to get positive response was not significant; P value was 0.074 and 95% confidence interval was -0.28 to 5.98.

Conclusions

Isosorbide dinitrate yields more positive HUTT than isoprenaline. The frequencies of type of responses are not different between passive testing, isosorbide dinitrate, and isoprenaline. There is no difference in time taken for positive response between isosorbide dinitrate and isoprenaline. In comparison to isosorbide dinitrate and isoprenaline, passive testing showed longest time for positive response.

SUBMITTER: Bilagi UR

PROVIDER: S-EPMC5319004 | biostudies-literature | 2017 Jan - Feb

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Isoprenaline versus nitroglycerine in head-up tilt test.

Bilagi Umesh R UR Shenthar Jayaprakash J Cholenahally Manjunath Nanjappa MN

Indian heart journal 20160620 1

<h4>Background</h4>HUTT test is used in evaluation of syncope. Isoprenaline and isosorbide dinitrate are used to increase the sensitivity of the test. These drugs act by different mechanisms. We aimed to compare the results of isoprenaline with isosorbide dinitrate.<h4>Methods and results</h4>We studied 198 subjects referred for HUTT to our institute; those above the age of 35 years were not included in our study, because isoprenaline was not used commonly above this age; thus, only 90 subjects ...[more]

PMID: 28228306

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundIntensive rehabilitation of patients with severe traumatic brain injury is generally applied in the subacute stages of the hospital stay. Few studies have assessed the association between early and intensive physical rehabilitation and functional outcomes. The aim of this trial is to assess the feasibility of an intensive physical rehabilitation intervention focusing on mobilisation to the upright position, starting as early as clinically possible versus standard care in the intensive care unit. The feasibility study is intended to inform a subsequent randomised clinical trial that will investigate benefits and harms of the intervention.MethodsThis randomised clinical feasibility trial with a follow-up period of 1 year will use blinded outcome assessors for the Coma Recovery Scale-Revised. A maximum of 60 patients admitted to the neurointensive care unit at Rigshospitalet, Denmark, with traumatic brain injury (age of at least 18 years), a low level of consciousness, and stable intracranial pressure will be included in the trial. Patients will be randomly assigned to experimental intervention versus standard care (1:1) stratified according to their Glasgow Coma Score. The intervention group will receive daily mobilisation in a tilt table with an integrated stepping device (ERIGO®). Feasibility is declared if more than 60% (the lower 95% confidence interval of the proportion) of eligible patients are included in the trial and more than 52% (the lower 95% confidence interval of the proportion) of patients in the intervention group receive more than 60% of the planned interventions. Safety is assessed by the occurrence of adverse events and adverse reactions. Exploratory clinical outcomes consist of cerebral haemodynamics (blood flow velocity and pressure autoregulation) and baroreceptor sensitivity in the early phase as well as functional outcomes (Coma Recovery Scale-Revised, Early Functional Ability scale, and Functional Independence Measure).DiscussionOur findings will inform a future, larger-scale randomised clinical trial on early mobilisation using a tilt table early after severe traumatic brain injury.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02924649 . Registered on 3 October 2016.

Dataset Information

Isoprenaline versus nitroglycerine in head-up tilt test.

Background

Methods and results

Conclusions

Publications

Isoprenaline versus nitroglycerine in head-up tilt test.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets