Dataset Information

The Impact of "See the City You Serve" Field Trip: An Educational Tool for Teaching Social Determinants of Health.

ABSTRACT:

Background?

There has been limited evaluation of tools for teaching social determinants of health (SDOH).

Objective?

We evaluated a field trip as a tool for teaching SDOH to incoming medical interns.

Methods?

Incoming interns from The George Washington University participated in a bus field trip of Washington, DC, guided by community partners. The field trip introduced trainees to local neighborhoods. Pre- and postactivity surveys developed by the authors were analyzed using a Wilcoxon signed rank test. Reflection responses were recorded and counted for recurrent themes.

Results?

Incoming interns participated in 2015 (85 of 90, 94%) and in 2016 (96 of 116, 83%). Postactivity, basic knowledge of DC geographic health disparities increased, and a greater percentage of interns reported being at least somewhat comfortable understanding the neighborhoods from which their patients come (2015: 58% versus 89%, P < .0001; 2016: 65% versus 88%, P < .0001); identifying challenges to health care that affect low-income patients (2015: 74% versus 90%, P < .0023); describing community resources (2015: 29% versus 67%, P < .0001; 2016: 29% versus 50%, P < .0001); and referring patients to local community resources (2015: 25% versus 64%, P < .0001; 2016: 36% versus 52%, P < .0001). Interns reported that this experience improved their understanding of patients' background and local resources, and that they would change the way they practice.

Conclusions?

A bus field trip guided by community partners is a feasible way to increase residents' perception of their understanding of local disparities and comfort in addressing SDOH.

SUBMITTER: Chang AY

PROVIDER: S-EPMC5319610 | biostudies-literature | 2017 Feb

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

The Impact of "See the City You Serve" Field Trip: An Educational Tool for Teaching Social Determinants of Health.

Chang Aileen Y AY Bass Tracie L TL Duwell Monique M Berger Jeffrey S JS Bangalore Raksha R Lee Nancy S NS Amdur Richard L RL Andrews Marcus M Fahnestock Esme E Kahsay Lamek L El-Bayoumi Jehan J

Journal of graduate medical education 20170201 1

<h4>Background</h4>There has been limited evaluation of tools for teaching social determinants of health (SDOH).<h4>Objective</h4>We evaluated a field trip as a tool for teaching SDOH to incoming medical interns.<h4>Methods</h4>Incoming interns from The George Washington University participated in a bus field trip of Washington, DC, guided by community partners. The field trip introduced trainees to local neighborhoods. Pre- and postactivity surveys developed by the authors were analyzed using a ...[more]

PMID: 28261406

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundTo provide optimal care, medical students should understand that the social determinants of health (SDH) impact their patients' well-being. Those charged with teaching SDH to future physicians, however, face a paucity of curricular guidance.ObjectiveThis review's objective is to map key characteristics from publications about teaching SDH to students in undergraduate medical education (UME).MethodsIn 2016, the authors searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, the Cochrane and ERIC databases, bibliographies, and MedEdPORTAL for articles published between January 2010 and November 2016. Four reviewers screened articles for eligibility then extracted and analyzed data descriptively. Scoping review methodology was used to map key concepts and curricular logistics as well as educator and student characteristics.ResultsThe authors screened 3571 unique articles of which 22 were included in the final review. Many articles focused on community engagement (15). Experiential learning was a common instructional strategy (17) and typically took the form of community or clinic-based learning. Nearly half (10) of the manuscripts described school-wide curricula, of which only three spanned a full year. The majority of assessment was self-reported (20) and often related to affective change. Few studies objectively assessed learner outcomes (2).ConclusionsThe abundance of initial articles screened highlights the growing interest in SDH in medical education. The small number of selected articles with sufficient detail for abstraction demonstrates limited SDH curricular dissemination. A lack of accepted tools or practices that limit development of robust learner or program evaluation was noted. Future research should focus on identifying and evaluating effective instructional and assessment methodologies to address this gap, exploring additional innovative teaching frameworks, and examining the specific contexts and characteristics of marginalized and underserved populations and their coverage in medical education.

Project description:BackgroundSocial determinants of health are a well-described influencer of pregnancy-related morbidity and mortality. It is unclear how societal changes secondary to the COVID-19 pandemic altered the social determinants of health among pregnant patients.ObjectiveThis study aimed to investigate differences in the social determinants of health among patients who experienced pregnancy before and during the COVID-19 pandemic.Study designThis was a secondary analysis of an ongoing prospective cohort study examining the social determinants of health in postpartum patients at a single inner-city academic medical center. The planned secondary analysis was to compare the social determinants of health between patients that experienced societal changes before the pandemic and patients that experienced societal changes during the pandemic. Patients were included in the pandemic group if they delivered on or after March 30, 2020; moreover, patients in the pandemic group were compared with those who delivered before March 30, 2020 (referent group). Medical records were used to collect sociodemographic, pregnancy, and infant outcome data. The study participants were interviewed to collect detailed information regarding their perceived social, emotional, and physical environment as indicators of social determinants of health. Generalized linear modeling estimated the influence of social determinants of health  on births during the COVID-19 pandemic.ResultsOverall, 577 patients were enrolled in the study, of which 452 (78%) delivered before the COVID-19 pandemic and 125 (22%) delivered during the pandemic. Patients who delivered during the pandemic were more likely to report limited social or emotional support (relative risk, 1.62; 95% confidence interval, 1.02-2.59) and higher race-based discrimination (relative risk, 1.59; 95% confidence interval, 1.00-2.53). Mothers in the prepandemic group were more likely to have used federally funded programs, such as Medicaid, food stamps, and the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children, during their pregnancy. Furthermore, the referent group reported more limited access to transportation. In addition, mothers in the prepandemic group were more likely to initiate prenatal care at a later gestational age and have fewer total prenatal care visits.ConclusionThe COVID-19 pandemic created unprecedented changes in pregnancy care, and these were reflected in social determinants of health. It is imperative that we focus on the social determinants of health that were mitigated during this time and their effects on maternal and infant health.

Project description:BackgroundEducational autopsy (EA) is an innovative technique designed to improve the quality of feedback provided to conference presenters. In response to survey fatigue and suboptimal feedback from online evaluations, this postlecture group debrief was adapted to emergency medicine residency didactics, with a goal of collecting timely, specific, and balanced feedback for presenters. Other aims include encouraging participants to think critically about educational methods and providing presenters with formal feedback for a portfolio or promotion packet. It was hypothesized that EA provides more specific and actionable feedback than traditional online evaluations deployed individually to conference attendees.MethodsThe authors analyzed 4 months of evaluations pre- and postimplementation of EA. Rate of completion, presence of comments, and types of comments were compared. Comments were coded as specific, nonspecific, and unrelated/unclear. Specific comments were further categorized as about audiovisual presentation design, speaker presentation style, and educational methods of the session.ResultsA total of 46 of 65 (71%) preimplementation presentations eligible for evaluation received comments through traditional online evaluations. A total of 44 of 75 (59%) eligible postimplementation presentations generated comments via EA. Among presentations that received comments, none received nonspecific comments via EA, compared to 46% of lectures through traditional evaluations. EA generated specific comments for more presentations regarding presentation design (91% vs. 63%), presentation style (66% vs. 24%), and educational methods (48% vs. 28%). EA produced no unclear comments; traditional evaluations resulted in unclear comments for 15% of lectures.ConclusionsEA generated more specific feedback for residency conference presenters, although there were a number of sessions not evaluated by EA. Although this limited analysis suggested that EA produced higher-quality presenter feedback, it also showed a drop-off in the proportion of didactic sessions that received narrative feedback.

Dataset Information

The Impact of "See the City You Serve" Field Trip: An Educational Tool for Teaching Social Determinants of Health.

Background?

Objective?

Methods?

Results?

Conclusions?

Publications

The Impact of "See the City You Serve" Field Trip: An Educational Tool for Teaching Social Determinants of Health.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets