Dataset Information

Paclitaxel, Ifosfamide, and Cisplatin Efficacy for First-Line Treatment of Patients With Intermediate- or Poor-Risk Germ Cell Tumors.

ABSTRACT:

Purpose

Paclitaxel, ifosfamide, and cisplatin (TIP) achieved complete responses (CRs) in two thirds of patients with advanced germ cell tumors (GCTs) who relapsed after first-line chemotherapy with cisplatin and etoposide with or without bleomycin. We tested the efficacy of first-line TIP in patients with intermediate- or poor-risk disease.

Patients and methods

In this prospective, multicenter, single-arm phase II trial, previously untreated patients with International Germ Cell Cancer Collaborative Group poor-risk or modified intermediate-risk GCTs received four cycles of TIP (paclitaxel 240 mg/m(2) over 2 days, ifosfamide 6 g/m(2) over 5 days with mesna support, and cisplatin 100 mg/m(2) over 5 days) once every 3 weeks with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor support. The primary end point was the CR rate.

Results

Of the first 41 evaluable patients, 28 (68%) achieved a CR, meeting the primary efficacy end point. After additional accrual on an extension phase, total enrollment was 60 patients, including 40 (67%) with poor risk and 20 (33%) with intermediate risk. Thirty-eight (68%) of 56 evaluable patients achieved a CR and seven (13%) achieved partial responses with negative markers (PR-negative) for a favorable response rate of 80%. Five of seven achieving PR-negative status had seminoma and therefore did not undergo postchemotherapy resection of residual masses. Estimated 3-year progression-free survival and overall survival rates were 72% (poor risk, 63%; intermediate risk, 90%) and 91% (poor risk, 87%; intermediate risk, 100%), respectively. Grade 3 to 4 toxicities consisted primarily of reversible hematologic or electrolyte abnormalities, including neutropenic fever in 18%.

Conclusion

TIP demonstrated efficacy as first-line therapy for intermediate- and poor-risk GCTs with an acceptable safety profile. Given higher rates of favorable response, progression-free survival, and overall survival compared with prior first-line studies, TIP warrants further study in this population.

SUBMITTER: Feldman DR

PROVIDER: S-EPMC5320896 | biostudies-literature | 2016 Jul

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Paclitaxel, Ifosfamide, and Cisplatin Efficacy for First-Line Treatment of Patients With Intermediate- or Poor-Risk Germ Cell Tumors.

Feldman Darren R DR Hu James J Dorff Tanya B TB Lim Kristina K Patil Sujata S Woo Kaitlin M KM Carousso Maryann M Hughes Amanda A Sheinfeld Joel J Bains Manjit M Daneshmand Siamak S Ketchens Charlene C Bajorin Dean F DF Bosl George J GJ Quinn David I DI Motzer Robert J RJ

Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology 20160516 21

<h4>Purpose</h4>Paclitaxel, ifosfamide, and cisplatin (TIP) achieved complete responses (CRs) in two thirds of patients with advanced germ cell tumors (GCTs) who relapsed after first-line chemotherapy with cisplatin and etoposide with or without bleomycin. We tested the efficacy of first-line TIP in patients with intermediate- or poor-risk disease.<h4>Patients and methods</h4>In this prospective, multicenter, single-arm phase II trial, previously untreated patients with International Germ Cell C ...[more]

PMID: 27185842

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundGerm cell tumors represent highly curable disease even in metastatic stage. However, poor-risk patients with an unfavorable serum tumor marker (STM) decline after the first cycle of chemotherapy represent a subgroup with dismal prognosis, with approximately 50% cure rate using bleomycin, etoposide, and cisplatin (BEP).ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to determine the efficacy and safety of paclitaxel, ifosfamide, and cisplatin (TIP) in this patient population.Design setting and participantsThis was an open-labeled, nonrandomized, single-center phase II trial to study the efficacy and toxicity of TIP in the first-line treatment of germ cell tumor patients with an unfavorable decline of STMs. Nineteen patients with a poor prognosis according to the International Germ Cell Cancer Collaboration Group classification and an unfavorable STM decline after the first cycle of chemotherapy were included in this phase II study (NCT02414685). The treatment regimen consisted of paclitaxel 250 mg/m2 on day 1, ifosfamide 1200 mg/m2 on days 1-5, and cisplatin 20 mg/m2 on days 1-5, totally for four cycles.Outcome measurements and statistical analysisThe primary endpoint was complete response (CR) rate. An optimal Simon two-stage design was used with a type I error of 5% and study power of 80%. If fewer than six CRs to study therapy have been observed among the first 19 patients, the study was to be terminated.Results and limitationsA CR was achieved in four (21.1%) patients; therefore, the study was terminated in the first stage. A favorable response rate (CR or partial remission with negative tumor markers) was observed in 14 (78.9%) patients. At a median follow-up period of 35.2 mo (range, 5.6-62.1 mo), ten (52.6%) patients experienced disease progression and eight patients (42.1%) died. The 2-yr progression-free and overall survival was 41.2% (95% confidence interval [CI] 16.8-65.7) and 72.7% (95% CI 48.9-96.4), respectively. TIP was well tolerated, and no unexpected toxicity was observed. No informative biomarkers, including miR-371a-3p was identified.ConclusionsTreatment modification from the BEP to the TIP regimen in patients with an unfavorable STM decline after the first cycle of chemotherapy was not associated with improved outcome, and four cycles of BEP remain the standard treatment option in this patient population.Patient summaryPoor-risk patients with an unfavorable serum tumor marker decline after the first cycle of chemotherapy represent a subgroup with dismal prognosis, with an approximately 50% cure rate using bleomycin, etoposide, and cisplatin (BEP). Treatment modification from the BEP regimen to the paclitaxel, ifosfamide, and cisplatin regimen in patients with an unfavorable serum tumor marker decline after the first cycle of chemotherapy was not associated with improved outcome, and four cycles of BEP remain the standard treatment option in this patient population.

Project description:PurposeTo compare the efficacy of four cycles of paclitaxel-bleomycin, etoposide, and cisplatin (T-BEP) to four cycles of bleomycin, etoposide, and cisplatin (BEP) in previously untreated patients with intermediate-prognosis germ-cell cancer (GCC).Patients and methodsPatients were randomly assigned to receive either T-BEP or standard BEP. Patients assigned to the T-BEP group received paclitaxel 175 mg/m(2) in a 3-hour infusion. Patients who were administered T-BEP received primary granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) prophylaxis. The study was designed as a randomized open-label phase II/III study. To show a 10% improvement in 3-year progression-free survival (PFS), the study aimed to recruit 498 patients but closed with 337 patients as a result of slow accrual.ResultsAccrual was from November 1998 to April 2009. A total of 169 patients were administered BEP, and 168 patients were administered T-BEP. Thirteen patients in both arms were ineligible, mainly as a result of a good prognosis of GCC (eight patients administered BEP; six patients administered T-BEP) or a poor prognosis of GCC (one patient administered BEP; four patients administered T-BEP). PFS at 3 years (intent to treat) was 79.4% in the T-BEP group versus 71.1% in the BEP group (hazard ratio [HR], 0.73; CI, 0.47 to 1.13; P [log-rank test] = 0.153). PFS at 3 years in all eligible patients was 82.7% versus 70.1%, respectively (HR, 0.60; CI: 0.37 to 0.97) and was statistically significant (P = 0.03). Overall survival was not statistically different.ConclusionT-BEP administered with G-CSF seems to be a safe and effective treatment regimen for patients with intermediate-prognosis GCC. However, the study recruited a smaller-than-planned number of patients and included 7.7% ineligible patients. The primary analysis of the trial could not demonstrate statistical superiority of T-BEP for PFS. When ineligible patients were excluded, the analysis of all eligible patients demonstrated a 12% superior 3-year PFS with T-BEP, which was statistically significant.

Project description:BackgroundTreatment options have been historically limited for cisplatin-ineligible patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma (UC). Given the need for alternatives to platinum-based chemotherapy, including non-chemotherapy regimens for patients with both impaired renal function and borderline functional status, in 2010 (prior to the immune checkpoint blockade era in metastatic UC), we initiated a phase II trial to test the activity of everolimus or everolimus plus paclitaxel in the cisplatin-ineligible setting.MethodsThis was an open-label phase II trial conducted within the US-based Hoosier Cancer Research Network (ClinicalTrials.gov number: NCT01215136). Patients who were cisplatin-ineligible with previously untreated advanced UC were enrolled. Patients with both impaired renal function and poor performance status were enrolled into cohort 1; patients with either were enrolled into cohort 2. Patients received everolimus 10 mg daily alone (cohort 1) or with paclitaxel 80 mg/m2 on days 1, 8, and 15 of each 28-day cycle (cohort 2). The primary outcome was clinical benefit at 4 months. Secondary outcomes were adverse events, progression-free survival (PFS), and 1-year overall survival (OS). Exploratory endpoints included genomic correlates of outcomes. The trial was not designed for comparison between cohorts.ResultsA total of 36 patients were enrolled from 2010 to 2018 (cohort 1, N = 7; cohort 2, N = 29); the trial was terminated due to slow accrual. Clinical benefit at 4 months was attained by 0 (0%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0-41.0%) patients in cohort 1 and 11 patients (37.9%, 95% CI 20.7-57.7%) in cohort 2. Median PFS was 2.33 (95% CI 1.81-Inf) months in cohort 1 and 5.85 (95% CI 2.99-8.61) months in cohort 2. Treatment was discontinued due to adverse events for 2 patients (29%) in cohort 1 and 11 patients (38%) in cohort 2. Molecular alterations in microtubule associated genes may be associated with treatment benefit but this requires further testing.ConclusionEverolimus plus paclitaxel demonstrates clinical activity in cisplatin-ineligible patients with metastatic UC, although the specific contribution of everolimus cannot be delineated. Patients with both impaired renal function and borderline functional status may be difficult to enroll to prospective trials. (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT01215136).

Dataset Information

Paclitaxel, Ifosfamide, and Cisplatin Efficacy for First-Line Treatment of Patients With Intermediate- or Poor-Risk Germ Cell Tumors.

Purpose

Patients and methods

Results

Conclusion

Publications

Paclitaxel, Ifosfamide, and Cisplatin Efficacy for First-Line Treatment of Patients With Intermediate- or Poor-Risk Germ Cell Tumors.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets