Unknown

Dataset Information

0

Treatment of complicated urinary tract infection and acute pyelonephritis by short-course intravenous levofloxacin (750 mg/day) or conventional intravenous/oral levofloxacin (500 mg/day): prospective, open-label, randomized, controlled, multicenter, non-inferiority clinical trial.


ABSTRACT: To compare the efficacy and safety of short-course intravenous levofloxacin (LVFX) 750 mg with a conventional intravenous/oral regimen of LVFX 500 mg in patients from China with complicated urinary tract infections (cUTIs) and acute pyelonephritis (APN).This was a prospective, open-label, randomized, controlled, multicenter, non-inferiority clinical trial. Patients with cUTI and APN were randomly assigned to a short-course therapy group (intravenous LVFX at750 mg/day for 5 days) or a conventional therapy group (intravenous/oral regimen of LVFX at 500 mg/day for 7-14 days). The clinical, laboratory, and microbiological results were evaluated for efficacy and safety.The median dose of LVFX was 3555.4 mg in the short-course therapy group and 4874.2 mg in the conventional therapy group. Intention-to-treat analysis indicated the clinical effectiveness in the short-course therapy group (89.87%, 142/158) was non-inferior to that in the conventional therapy group (89.31%, 142/159). The microbiological effectiveness rates were also similar (short-course therapy: 89.55%, 60/67; conventional therapy: 86.30%, 63/73; p > 0.05). There were no significant differences in other parameters, including clinical and microbiological recurrence rates. The incidence of adverse effects and drug-related adverse effects were also similar for the short-course therapy group (21.95%, 36/164; 18.90%, 31/164) and the conventional therapy group (23.03%, 38/165; 15.76%, 26/165).Patients with cUTIs and APN who were given short-course LVFX therapy and conventional LVFX therapy had similar outcomes in clinical and microbiological efficacy, tolerance, and safety. The short-course therapy described here is a more convenient alternative to the conventional regimen with potential implication in anti-resistance and cost saving.

SUBMITTER: Ren H 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC5321781 | biostudies-literature | 2017 Mar

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

Treatment of complicated urinary tract infection and acute pyelonephritis by short-course intravenous levofloxacin (750 mg/day) or conventional intravenous/oral levofloxacin (500 mg/day): prospective, open-label, randomized, controlled, multicenter, non-inferiority clinical trial.

Ren Hong H   Li Xiao X   Ni Zhao-Hui ZH   Niu Jian-Ying JY   Cao Bin B   Xu Jie J   Cheng Hong H   Tu Xiao-Wen XW   Ren Ai-Min AM   Hu Ying Y   Xing Chang-Ying CY   Liu Ying-Hong YH   Li Yan-Feng YF   Cen Jun J   Zhou Rong R   Xu Xu-Dong XD   Qiu Xiao-Hui XH   Chen Nan N  

International urology and nephrology 20170120 3


<h4>Objective</h4>To compare the efficacy and safety of short-course intravenous levofloxacin (LVFX) 750 mg with a conventional intravenous/oral regimen of LVFX 500 mg in patients from China with complicated urinary tract infections (cUTIs) and acute pyelonephritis (APN).<h4>Methods</h4>This was a prospective, open-label, randomized, controlled, multicenter, non-inferiority clinical trial. Patients with cUTI and APN were randomly assigned to a short-course therapy group (intravenous LVFX at750 m  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC3444829 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5955556 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7038258 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7823373 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC3717162 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC3906991 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5913993 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC1955287 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6736538 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5124239 | biostudies-literature