Unknown

Dataset Information

0

Can lymphovascular invasion replace the prognostic value of lymph node involvement in patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma after radical nephroureterectomy?


ABSTRACT:

Introduction

This study aimed to evaluate whether lymphovascular invasion (LVI) can replace lymph node (LN) involvement as a prognostic marker in patients who do not undergo lymph node dissection (LND) during surgery in patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC).

Methods

A total of 505 patients who underwent radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) were recruited from four academic centres and divided into four groups: node negative (N0, Group 1); node positive (N+, Group 2); no LND without LVI (NxLVI-, Group 3); and no LND with LVI (NxLVI+, Group 4).

Results

Patients in Group 2 had larger tumours, a higher incidence of left-sided involvement, more aggressive T stage and grade, and a higher positive surgical margin rate than patients in other groups. Pathological features (T stage and grade) were poorer in Group 4 than in Groups 1 and 3. Compared to other groups, Group 2 had the worst prognostic outcomes regarding locoregional/distant metastasis-free survival (MFS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and overall survival (OS). LVI and LN status in Group 4 was not associated with MFS in multivariate analysis. Among Nx diseases, LVI was not an independent predictor of MFS or CCS. The small number of cases in Groups 2 and 4 is a major limitation of this study.

Conclusions

Clinical outcomes according to LVI did not correlate with those outcomes predicted by LN involvement in patients with UTUC. Therefore, LVI may not be used as a substitute for nodal status in patients who do not undergo LND at the time of surgery.

SUBMITTER: Yoo ES 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC5325751 | biostudies-literature | 2016 Jul-Aug

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

Can lymphovascular invasion replace the prognostic value of lymph node involvement in patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma after radical nephroureterectomy?

Yoo Eun Sang ES   Ha Yun-Sok YS   Lee Jun Nyung JN   Kim Bum Soo BS   Kim Bup Wan BW   Byun Seok-Soo SS   Choi Young Deuk YD   Kang Ho Won HW   Yun Seok-Joong SJ   Kim Wun-Jae WJ   Kim Jeong Hyun JH   Kwon Tae Gyun TG  

Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada 20160712 7-8


<h4>Introduction</h4>This study aimed to evaluate whether lymphovascular invasion (LVI) can replace lymph node (LN) involvement as a prognostic marker in patients who do not undergo lymph node dissection (LND) during surgery in patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC).<h4>Methods</h4>A total of 505 patients who underwent radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) were recruited from four academic centres and divided into four groups: node negative (N0, Group 1); node positive (N+, Group 2); n  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC6002847 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6907152 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC3969987 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7954472 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC4329347 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7475672 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC11003889 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC9648663 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7889610 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7052419 | biostudies-literature