Dataset Information

The diagnostic accuracy of a single CEA blood test in detecting colorectal cancer recurrence: Results from the FACS trial.

ABSTRACT:

Objective

To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of a single CEA (carcinoembryonic antigen) blood test in detecting colorectal cancer recurrence.

Background

Patients who have undergone curative resection for primary colorectal cancer are typically followed up with scheduled CEA testing for 5 years. Decisions to investigate further (usually by CT imaging) are based on single test results, reflecting international guidelines.

Methods

A secondary analysis was undertaken of data from the FACS trial (two arms included CEA testing). The composite reference standard applied included CT-CAP imaging, clinical assessment and colonoscopy. Accuracy in detecting recurrence was evaluated in terms of sensitivity, specificity, likelihood ratios, predictive values, time-dependent area under the ROC curves, and operational performance when used prospectively in clinical practice are reported.

Results

Of 582 patients, 104 (17.9%) developed recurrence during the 5 year follow-up period. Applying the recommended threshold of 5?g/L achieves at best 50.0% sensitivity (95% CI: 40.1-59.9%); in prospective use in clinical practice it would lead to 56 missed recurrences (53.8%; 95% CI: 44.2-64.4%) and 89 false alarms (56.7% of 157 patients referred for investigation). Applying a lower threshold of 2.5?g/L would reduce the number of missed recurrences to 36.5% (95% CI: 26.5-46.5%) but would increase the false alarms to 84.2% (924/1097 referred). Some patients are more prone to false alarms than others-at the 5?g/L threshold, the 89 episodes of unnecessary investigation were clustered in 29 individuals.

Conclusion

Our results demonstrated very low sensitivity for CEA, bringing to question whether it could ever be used as an independent triage test. It is not feasible to improve the diagnostic performance of a single test result by reducing the recommended action threshold because of the workload and false alarms generated. Current national and international guidelines merit re-evaluation and options to improve performance, such as making clinical decisions on the basis of CEA trend, should be further assessed.

SUBMITTER: Shinkins B

PROVIDER: S-EPMC5345794 | biostudies-literature | 2017

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

The diagnostic accuracy of a single CEA blood test in detecting colorectal cancer recurrence: Results from the FACS trial.

Shinkins Bethany B Nicholson Brian D BD Primrose John J Perera Rafael R James Timothy T Pugh Sian S Mant David D

PloS one 20170310 3

<h4>Objective</h4>To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of a single CEA (carcinoembryonic antigen) blood test in detecting colorectal cancer recurrence.<h4>Background</h4>Patients who have undergone curative resection for primary colorectal cancer are typically followed up with scheduled CEA testing for 5 years. Decisions to investigate further (usually by CT imaging) are based on single test results, reflecting international guidelines.<h4>Methods</h4>A secondary analysis was undertaken of data f ...[more]

PMID: 28282381

Similar Datasets

Project description:INTRODUCTION:Diabetic retinopathy (DR) is a common microvascular complication of diabetes mellitus and the leading cause of impaired vision in adults worldwide. Early detection and treatment for DR could improve patient outcomes. Traditional methods of detecting DR include the gold standard Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study seven standard fields fundus photography, ophthalmoscopy and slit-lamp biomicroscopy. These modalities can be expensive, difficult to access and require involvement of specialised healthcare professionals. With the development of mobile phone technology, there is a growing interest in their use for DR identification as this approach is potentially more affordable, accessible and easier to use. Smartphones can be employed in a variety of ways for ophthalmoscopy including the use of smartphone camera, various attachments and artificial intelligence for obtaining and grading of retinal images. The aim of this scoping review is to determine the diagnostic test accuracy of various smartphone ophthalmoscopy approaches for detecting DR in diabetic patients. METHODS AND ANALYSIS:We will perform an electronic search of MEDLINE, Embase and Cochrane Library for literature published from 2000 onwards. Two reviewers will independently analyse studies for eligibility and assess study quality using the QUADAS-2 tool. Data for a 2?2 contingency table will be extracted. If possible, we will pool sensitivity and specificity data using the random-effects model and construct a summary receiver operating characteristic curve. In case of high heterogeneity, we will present the findings narratively. Subgroup analysis and sensitivity analysis will be performed where appropriate. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION:This scoping review aims to provide an overview of smartphone ophthalmoscopy in DR identification. It will present findings on the accuracy of smartphone ophthalmoscopy in detecting DR, identify gaps in the literature and provide recommendations for future research. This review does not require ethical approval as we will not collect primary data.

Project description:BackgroundMost of national schistosomiasis elimination programmes in Asia are relying on stool examination, particularly Kato Katz stool examination technique for regular transmission monitoring. However, the Kato-Katz technique has shown low sensitivity for the detection of light-intensity infections, and therefore highly sensitive diagnostic tools are urgently required to monitor prevalence of infection in low transmission settings. The objective of this systematic review was to evaluate and synthesize the performance of diagnostic tests for detecting Schistosoma japonicum and S. mekongi infection in people living in endemic areas.Methodology/principal findingsWe comprehensively searched these nine electronic databases and other resources until July 2019, with no language or publication limits: PubMed, EMBASE, MEDLINE, Web of Science, BIOSIS Citation Index, HTA, CINAHL PLUS, The Cochrane Library, and PsycINFO. We included original studies that assessed diagnostic performance using antibody, antigen, and molecular tests with stool examination test as a reference standard. Two reviewers independently extracted a standard set of data and assessed study quality. We estimated the pooled estimates of sensitivity and specificity for each index test. We used diagnostic odds ratio to determine the overall accuracy and hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristics (HSROC) curve to assess the index tests performance. Fifteen studies (S. japonicum [n = 13] and S. mekongi [n = 2]) testing 15,303 participants were included in the review. Five studies reported performance of enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), seven studies reported indirect hemagglutination assay (IHA), and four studies reported polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for detecting S. japonicum. The pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.93 (95% CI: 0.84-0.98) and 0.40 (95% CI: 0.29-0.53) for ELISA, 0.97 (95% CI: 0.90-0.99) and 0.66 (95% CI: 0.58-0.73) for IHA, and 0.89 (95% CI: 0.71-0.96) and 0.49 (95% CI: 0.29-0.69) for PCR respectively. A global summary indicated the best performance for IHA, closely followed by ELISA. We were unable to perform meta-analysis for S. mekongi due to insufficient number of studies.Conclusions/significanceIHA showed the highest detection accuracy for S. japonicum. Further studies are needed to determine the suitable diagnostic methods to verify the absence of transmission of S. mekongi and also to compare detection accuracy against more sensitive reference standards such as PCR.

Project description:BackgroundPlasma heat shock protein 90 alpha (Hsp90α) has been suggested as a novel biomarker for the diagnosis and prognosis of cancer. Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and carbohydrate antigen199 (CA199) are traditional tumor biomarkers for colorectal cancer (CRC). Previous studies have shown that Hsp90α and the combination of Hsp90α and CEA are optimal biomarkers for CRC at an early stage. However, research on the use of Hsp90α alone or in combination with CEA and/or CA199 in diagnosing CRC development, particularly liver metastasis, is limited. This study sought to investigate the value of Hsp90α alone or in combination with CEA/CA199 in diagnosing CRC liver metastasis.MethodsThe clinical data of 472 CRC patients were retrospectively analyzed, which were confirmed by clinical manifestations and a histopathological examination associated with an imaging diagnosis. The levels of Hsp90α, and CEA, and CA199 were assessed by enzyme-linked immunoassays and electrochemiluminescence immunoassays. Liver metastasis was diagnosed by imaging or pathology of the liver. Logistic regression models were used to analyze associations between Hsp90α, CEA, and CA199, and liver metastasis in CRC. The areas under the curves (AUCs) were used to compare the utility of Hsp90α, CEA, and CA199 in the diagnosis of CRC liver metastasis (CRLM). Additionally, we compared the diagnostic utility of the models, including the Hsp90α plus 1 of the other serum markers, and a combination of the 3 serum makers.ResultsThe plasma levels of Hsp90α, CEA, and CA199 were positively associated with a higher risk of CRLM [odds ratios (OR) ranging from 1.36-2.72]. The AUCs of CEA, CA199, and Hsp90α for CRLM were 0.80, 0.69, and 0.55, respectively. The AUCs for the combination of Hsp90α and CEA, combination of Hsp90α and CA199, combinations of Hsp90α, CEA, and CA199 were 0.75, 0.66, 0.76, respectively. The combination of Hsp90α, CEA, and CA199 did not improve the diagnostic utility for liver metastasis in CRC.ConclusionsThe level of Hsp90α was elevated in CRC and was associated with CRLM. Thus, the Hsp90α is a potential biomarker for CRLM. CEA has the largest diagnostic utility for CRLM. Adding Hsp90α to CEA/CA199 did not improve their diagnostic utility for CRLM.

Dataset Information

The diagnostic accuracy of a single CEA blood test in detecting colorectal cancer recurrence: Results from the FACS trial.

Objective

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Publications

The diagnostic accuracy of a single CEA blood test in detecting colorectal cancer recurrence: Results from the FACS trial.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets