Dataset Information

The Double Bankart Bridge: A Technique for Restoration of the Labral Footprint in Arthroscopic Shoulder Instability Repair.

ABSTRACT: It has been proved by many researchers in the last few years that arthroscopic capsulolabral repair is an efficient method for surgical management of anteroinferior shoulder instability. Different arthroscopic techniques using different fixation devices and constructs have been described in the literature, but the suture anchors were the most used implants to shift the inferiorly displaced capsulolabral complex and fix it to the glenoid. In the majority of these techniques, the anchors concentrate the load at specific points (e.g., at 3 or 4 interrupted points over the glenoid directly opposite the anchors) without putting direct pressure on the area of the labral footprint that is between the anchors. We describe here a technique using 2 standard suture anchors inferiorly in conjunction with a knotless suture anchor (e.g., 3.5 mm PushLock, Arthrex, Naples, FL) superiorly. No additional separate sutures or suture tapes are required other than those already loaded in the inferior 2 anchors, which are used to compress the capsulolabral complex to the glenoid in the areas between the suture anchors, producing a uniform pressure that may contribute to better healing.

SUBMITTER: Aboalata M

PROVIDER: S-EPMC5368097 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:PurposeTo evaluate the outcomes of arthroscopic Bankart repair with remplissage (ABRR) compared with the arthroscopic Latarjet (AL) procedure for anterior shoulder instability in patients with a labral tear and a concomitant engaging Hill-Sachs lesion.MethodsA retrospective review of patients who underwent either ABRR or the AL procedure for a diagnosis of anterior shoulder instability with a concomitant engaging Hill-Sachs lesion between 2011 and 2019 was performed. Recurrent instability, the visual analog scale score, the Subjective Shoulder Value, the Western Ontario Shoulder Instability score, patient satisfaction, willingness to undergo surgery again, and return to work or sport were evaluated.ResultsOur study included 41 patients treated with ABRR and 26 treated with the AL procedure. At final follow-up, there was no difference between patients who underwent ABRR and those who underwent the AL procedure in the reported Western Ontario Shoulder Instability score (21.8% vs 28.2%, P = .33) or any of its components, the visual analog scale score (0.9 vs 1.4, P = .32), the Subjective Shoulder Value (78.4 vs 74.5, P = .6062), the rate of satisfaction (81.6% vs 85.6%, P = .54), or whether patients would undergo surgery again (81.6% vs 96.1%, P = .16). Overall, 5 patients in the ABRR group and 2 patients in the AL group had recurrent instability events (12.2% vs 7.8%, P = .70), with no significant difference in the rate of recurrent dislocation (12.2% vs 3.8%, P = .39).ConclusionsIn patients with anterior shoulder instability and a concomitant Hill-Sachs lesion, both ABRR and the AL procedure were shown to be reliable treatments, with a low rate of recurrent instability and excellent patient-reported outcomes in appropriately selected patients. However, our study could not determine whether there was critical glenoid bone loss in patients undergoing ABRR, and surgeons should still exercise caution in performing ABRR in patients with high-grade glenoid bone loss or in those with failed prior stabilizations.Level of evidenceLevel III, retrospective cohort study.

Dataset Information

The Double Bankart Bridge: A Technique for Restoration of the Labral Footprint in Arthroscopic Shoulder Instability Repair.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets