Dataset Information

Arthroscopic Partial Repair of Irreparable, Massive Rotator Cuff Tears.

ABSTRACT: Several treatment options for chronic, massive rotator cuff tears exist, and they include debridement with possible biceps tenotomy or tenodesis, open or arthroscopic partial repair, muscle or tendon transfer, superior capsule reconstruction, synthetic patch augmentation, and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. The aim of this technique article is to describe our preferred surgical option for irreparable, massive rotator cuff tears with an irreparable supraspinatus, a reparable infraspinatus, and an intact or reparable subscapularis tendon.

SUBMITTER: Castricini R

PROVIDER: S-EPMC5368352 | biostudies-literature | 2017 Feb

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Arthroscopic Partial Repair of Irreparable, Massive Rotator Cuff Tears.

Castricini Roberto R Galasso Olimpio O Riccelli Daria Anna DA Familiari Filippo F De Benedetto Massimo M Orlando Nicola N Gasparini Giorgio G

Arthroscopy techniques 20170130 1

Several treatment options for chronic, massive rotator cuff tears exist, and they include debridement with possible biceps tenotomy or tenodesis, open or arthroscopic partial repair, muscle or tendon transfer, superior capsule reconstruction, synthetic patch augmentation, and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. The aim of this technique article is to describe our preferred surgical option for irreparable, massive rotator cuff tears with an irreparable supraspinatus, a reparable infraspinatus, a ...[more]

PMID: 28373953

Similar Datasets

Project description:PurposeTo determine the significance of initial and residual rotator cuff tear defect size on the need for revision surgery or additional nonsurgical therapy, in a consecutive group of patients undergoing partial repair of massive rotator cuff tears.MethodsA retrospective chart review was carried out for all arthroscopic rotator cuff repairs performed by a single surgeon between January of 2013 and December of 2016. All patients with massive rotator cuff tears (>30 cm2) who underwent partial repair were included in the study. Outcomes for the surgical procedure were measured based on the necessity for revision surgery or adjunct therapy, including steroid injections or additional physical therapy after initial release from care.ResultsIn total, 1954 patients who underwent arthroscopic rotator cuff repair were identified. Thirty-eight of these met the inclusion criteria. Those patients undergoing revision surgery represented 5.2% (2/38) of the series and had an average initial/residual tear defect area of 45.0/7.0 cm2. Patients requiring adjunct therapy represented 7.9% (3/38) of the series and possessed an average initial/residual tear defect size of 40.0/16.0 cm2. The remaining 33 (86.9%) patients did not require revision surgery or adjunct therapy at a minimum follow-up of 2 years. There was no significance between initial and/or residual rotator cuff tear defect size and the need for revision surgery. However, there was a significant difference in the mean residual defect size in the patients requiring additional nonoperative treatment after initial release from care (P = .012).ConclusionsThere was no relationship between residual defect size after partial repair and the need for revision surgery. Patients who returned for additional nonoperative treatment after being released from care were noted to have a statistically larger residual defect size at the time of index surgical intervention. Only 5% of patients underwent subsequent surgery at an average of more than 4 years' follow-up, suggesting that partial repair of massive rotator cuff tears can provide a durable, joint-preserving intervention.Level of evidenceLevel IV, Therapeutic Case Series.

Project description:PurposeTo compare the clinical and radiographic outcomes of partial rotator cuff repair (RCR) with and without implantation of a biodegradable subacromial spacer in the treatment of symptomatic irreparable massive rotator cuff tears (MRCTs).MethodsPatients with MRCT who underwent arthroscopic partial repair alone (PR) or combined with subacromial spacer augmentation (PRS) were included. Patient-reported outcomes, including visual analog scale (VAS), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES), and Constant scores in addition to range of motion (ROM) were collected preoperatively and at the final follow-up. Additionally, we determined the percentages of all of the patients in groups that achieved the minimal clinical important difference (MCID), substantial clinical benefit (SCB), and patient-acceptable symptomatic state (PASS) for the VAS, ASES, and Constant scores. Acromiohumeral distance (AHD) was determined as well.ResultsA total of 32 patients were included. Group PR included 20 patients with a median age of 68 years (range: 64-73) and median follow-up 28.0 months (14.0-60.0). Group PRS included 12 patients with a median age of 68.5 years (range: 63-74) and median follow-up of 17.0 months (12.0-32.0). At the final follow-up, the ASES, VAS, and Constant scores were significantly higher in the PRS group (75.5 [55-88.3], 1.0 [0-3], and 70.0 [43-79], respectively, compared to the PR group (55.0 [37.5-65], 2.0 [0-4], and 55.0 [31-79], respectively; P < .05). The only statistically significant differences were found between the PR and PRS groups in terms of the proportions of the patients who achieved MCID for the ASES (70% vs. 100%; P = .04) and in terms of the proportions of the patients who achieved SCB for the ASES (60% vs 100%; P = .01) There was also statistically significant difference between the PR and PRS groups, in terms of the proportions of the patients who achieved PASS for the VAS and ASES ([30 % vs 66.7 %; P = .04] and [0 % vs 50 %; P = .001], respectively). AHD was also improved in the PRS group (8.4 [7-9.5] vs 7.85 [5.5-9]; P < .05). ROM was greater in the PRS group at final follow-up with median forward flexion degree, 140.0° (90°-150°) versus 120.0° (80°-153°) (P < .001) and median abduction degree, 100.0° (70°-130°) versus 90.0° (70°-110°). There was no difference in terms of external rotation between groups (3° [2°-5°] vs 3.0° (2°-4°); P = .4).ConclusionsArthroscopic partial RCR with implantation of a subacromial spacer leads to satisfactory clinical and radiographic outcomes in patients with symptomatic irreparable MRCT compared with patients treated with partial repair alone.Level of evidenceLevel III, retrospective comparative study.

Dataset Information

Arthroscopic Partial Repair of Irreparable, Massive Rotator Cuff Tears.

Publications

Arthroscopic Partial Repair of Irreparable, Massive Rotator Cuff Tears.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets