Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT: Background
Treatment for midgut neuroendocrine tumor patients with unresectable liver metastasis has long been a controversial issue. This system review aims to summarize existing evidence concerning the value of primary tumor resection in this group of patients.Results
8 cohort studies were identified for qualitative analysis. None of them strictly met with the inclusion criteria and meta-analysis was impossible. There was a tendency towards better overall survival for the primary tumor resected group in all 8 studies, in which 6 demonstrated significant difference. Progression free survival to liver disease was prolonged and less patients died of liver failure in the resected group.Methods
MEDLINE, EMBASE and CENTRAL were searched until 2016/7/4 for relevant studies, with primary outcome being overall survival, and secondary outcome being progression free survival, cause of death and symptom relief.Conclusions
Current evidence supports resection of primary tumor for midgut neuroendocrine tumor patients with liver metastases, but randomized controlled trials are required to reach a final conclusion.
SUBMITTER: Guo J
PROVIDER: S-EPMC5370049 | biostudies-literature | 2017 Mar
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Guo Jingfei J Zhang Qian Q Bi Xinyu X Zhou Jianguo J Li Zhiyu Z Huang Zhen Z Zhang Yefan Y Li Muxing M Chen Xiao X Hu Xuhui X Yihebali Chi C Liang Junbo J Liu Jianmei J Zhao Jianjun J Cai Jianqiang J Zhao Hong H
Oncotarget 20170301 10
<h4>Background</h4>Treatment for midgut neuroendocrine tumor patients with unresectable liver metastasis has long been a controversial issue. This system review aims to summarize existing evidence concerning the value of primary tumor resection in this group of patients.<h4>Results</h4>8 cohort studies were identified for qualitative analysis. None of them strictly met with the inclusion criteria and meta-analysis was impossible. There was a tendency towards better overall survival for the prima ...[more]