Dataset Information

The Volume-Outcome Effect: Impact on Trial-to-Permanent Conversion Rates in Spinal Cord Stimulation.

ABSTRACT: Conversion rates from trial leads to permanent spinal cord stimulation (SCS) systems have important implications for healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) and pain management. We hypothesized that there is a volume-outcome effect, with chronic pain patients who visit high volume SCS implanters will have higher trial-to-permanent conversion rates.We designed a large, retrospective analysis using the Truven MarketScan database analyzing adult SCS patients with provider information available, with or without IPG implantation from the years 2007 to 2012 was designed. Patients were divided into three provider-based groups: high (>25), medium (9-24), and low (3-8) volume providers. Univariate and multivariate models identified factors associated with successful conversion.A total of 17,850 unique trial implants were performed by 3028 providers. Of 13,879 patients with baseline data available, 8981 (64.7%) progressed to permanent SCS. Higher volume providers were associated with slightly higher conversion rates (65.9% vs. 63.3% low volume, p?=?0.029), explant rates (9.2% vs. 7.7% medium volume, p?=?0.026), younger age (52.0?±?13.4 years vs. 53.0?±?13.4 years, p?=?0.0026), Medicare/Medicaid (47.8% vs. 35.0% low volume, p?

SUBMITTER: Murphy KR

PROVIDER: S-EPMC5378689 | biostudies-literature | 2017 Apr

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

The Volume-Outcome Effect: Impact on Trial-to-Permanent Conversion Rates in Spinal Cord Stimulation.

Murphy Kelly Ryan KR Han Jing L JL Hussaini Syed Mohammed Qasim SM Yang Siyun S Parente Beth B Xie Jichun J Lad Shivanand P SP

Neuromodulation : journal of the International Neuromodulation Society 20161003 3

<h4>Objectives</h4>Conversion rates from trial leads to permanent spinal cord stimulation (SCS) systems have important implications for healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) and pain management. We hypothesized that there is a volume-outcome effect, with chronic pain patients who visit high volume SCS implanters will have higher trial-to-permanent conversion rates.<h4>Materials and methods</h4>We designed a large, retrospective analysis using the Truven MarketScan database analyzing adult SCS p ...[more]

PMID: 27696607

Similar Datasets

Project description:ImportanceIndividuals with spinal cord injury (SCI) have significant autonomic nervous system dysfunction. However, despite recent findings postulated to support that spinal cord stimulation improves dynamic autonomic regulation, limited scope of previous testing means the true effects remain unknown.ObjectiveTo determine whether transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation improves dynamic autonomic regulation after SCI.DesignSingle-blinded, randomized crossover trial with matched cohorts.SettingAcademic autonomic physiology laboratory.ParticipantsTwo pairs of well-matched individuals with and without high-thoracic, complete SCI.InterventionsSub-motor threshold transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation delivered at T10-T11 using 120Hz, 30Hz, and 30Hz with 5kHz carrier frequency at separate autonomic testing sessions.Main outcomes and measuresBaseline autonomic regulation was characterized with tests of above injury level sympathoexcitation (Valsalva's maneuver), sympathoinhibition (progressive doses of bolus intravenous phenylephrine), and below level sympathoexcitation (foot cold pressor test). At three subsequent visits, this testing battery was repeated with the addition of spinal cord stimulation at each frequency. Changes in autonomic regulation for each frequency were then analyzed relative to baseline testing for each individual and within matched cohorts.ResultsUninjured controls demonstrated no autonomic deficits at baseline and had no changes with any frequency of stimulation. Contrasting this, and as expected, individuals with SCI had baseline autonomic dysfunction. In a frequency-dependent manner, spinal cord stimulation enhanced sympathoexcitatory responses, normalizing previously impaired Valsalva's maneuvers. However, stimulation exacerbated already impaired sympathoinhibitory responses, resulting in significantly greater mean arterial pressure increases with the same phenylephrine doses compared to baseline. Impaired sympathoexcitatory response below the level of injury were also further exacerbated with spinal cord stimulation. At baseline, neither individual with SCI demonstrated autonomic dysreflexia with the noxious foot cold pressor test; the addition of stimulation led to a dysreflexic response in every trial, with greater relative hypertension and bradycardia indicating no improvement in autonomic regulation.Conclusions and relevanceTranscutaneous spinal cord stimulation does not improve autonomic regulation after SCI, and instead likely generates tonic, frequency-dependent sympathoexcitation which may lower the threshold for autonomic dysreflexia.

Project description:ObjectivesSpinal cord stimulation (SCS) has emerged as an appropriate modality of treatment for intractable chronic pain. The present study examines variations in SCS trial-to-permanent conversion rates based on provider types performing the procedure.Materials and methodsWe designed a large, retrospective analysis using the Truven MarketScan data base analyzing adult SCS patients with provider information available, with or without IPG implantation from the years 2007-2012. Patients were categorized based on provider type performing the implantation including anesthesiologists, neurosurgeons, orthopedic surgeons, and physical medicine and rehabilitation (PM&R). Univariate and multivariate models identified factors associated with successful conversion.ResultsA total of 7667 unique instances of SCS implants were identified across five providers. Overall, 4842 (63.2%) of those receiving trials underwent permanent SCS system implantation. Anesthesiology performed the majority of implants (62.8%), followed by neurosurgery (22.0%), orthopedic surgery (10.2%), and PM&R (5.3%). Compared to anesthesiologists, both neurosurgeons (OR 10.99, 95% CI [9.11, 13.25]; p < 0.001) and orthopedic surgeons (OR 4.64, 95% CI [3.81, 5.65]; p < 0.001) had significantly higher conversion rates, while PM&R (OR 0.71, 95% CI [0.58, 0.87]; p = 0.001) had significantly lower. Percutaneous implants comprised 5473 (71.4%) of all implants. Neurosurgeons and orthopedic surgeons performed a significantly greater number of paddle implants among the different providers (p < 0.0001). Explant rates were similar across all cohorts analyzed (average 11.6%; p = 0.546).ConclusionsIn this nationwide analysis, our results suggest that over a recent five-year period, conversion rates are highest when SCS trials are performed by neurosurgeons and orthopedic surgeons. The study has important implications for establishing uniform guidelines for training, patient selection, and education of physicians across multiple disciplines.

Dataset Information

The Volume-Outcome Effect: Impact on Trial-to-Permanent Conversion Rates in Spinal Cord Stimulation.

Publications

The Volume-Outcome Effect: Impact on Trial-to-Permanent Conversion Rates in Spinal Cord Stimulation.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets