Dataset Information

Comparison for Efficacy and Tolerability among Ten Drugs for Treatment of Parkinson's Disease: A Network Meta-Analysis.

ABSTRACT: Parkinson's disease (PD) is a long term disorder affects the central nervous system and we aim to determine the relative efficacy of the current available drugs used in PD. Firstly, we performed a systematic review in current literature and eligible studies were retrieved from online databases, relevant data were extracted. Efficacy of these medications was assessed by different Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scales (UPDRS). Mean difference (MD) and odds ratio (OR) were produced by pairwise or network meta-analysis (NMA). Finally, we performed a cluster analysis for the included medications with respect to their surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA). Pairwise meta-analysis suggests that selegiline had a higher ranking in UPDRS II, UPDRS III and UPDRS total than bromocriptine and levodopa. Selegiline was more tolerable than bromocriptine (OR?=?0.62, CI: 0.39 to 0.98) and pramipexole was less tolerable than levodopa (OR?=?1.43, CI?=?1.00 to 2.04). Results of NMA indicate that patients with levodopa, pramipexole, ropinirole and selegiline exhibited a significantly improved UPDRS III than those with lazabemide. To sum up, levodopa, selegiline, ropinirole and rotigotine were recommended for PD patients as they appeared relatively high efficacy and tolerability.

SUBMITTER: Zhuo C

PROVIDER: S-EPMC5379205 | biostudies-literature | 2017 Apr

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Comparison for Efficacy and Tolerability among Ten Drugs for Treatment of Parkinson's Disease: A Network Meta-Analysis.

Zhuo Chuanjun C Zhu Xiaodong X Jiang Ronghuan R Ji Feng F Su Zhonghua Z Xue Rong R Zhou Yuying Y

Scientific reports 20170404

Parkinson's disease (PD) is a long term disorder affects the central nervous system and we aim to determine the relative efficacy of the current available drugs used in PD. Firstly, we performed a systematic review in current literature and eligible studies were retrieved from online databases, relevant data were extracted. Efficacy of these medications was assessed by different Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scales (UPDRS). Mean difference (MD) and odds ratio (OR) were produced by pairwise ...[more]

PMID: 28374775

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundArtemisinin-based combination therapy (ACT) and novel drug combinations are available and used in African countries to treat uncomplicated malaria. Network meta-analysis methods are rarely and poorly applied for the comparison of their efficacies. This method was applied on a set of randomized controlled trials to illustrate its usefulness.MethodsA literature review available in Pubmed was conducted in July 2016. Eligible studies, conducted in sub-Saharan Africa, published between 2002 and 2016, focused on randomized controlled trials of at least two artemisinin-based combinations to treat uncomplicated malaria in children and adults. Agglomerate data were: the number of PCR-corrected adequate clinical and parasitological response (ACPR) on day 28, used as the primary enDHAPoint in all interventions, the number of participants and the list of treatments. A Bayesian random effect meta-analysis using a binary outcome was the method to compare the efficacy. Ranking measure was used to obtain a hierarchy of the competing interventions.ResultsIn total, 76 articles were included; 13 treatment regimens were involved and tested in 36,001 patients. Using artemether-lumefantrine (AL) as the common comparator for the entire network, 12 relative treatment effects were estimated and indirect comparisons were obtained. Dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine (DHAP) was shown to be more effective than AL (odds ratio [OR] = 1.92; 95% CI 1.30-2.82; 19,163 patients), ASAQ (OR = 1.70; 95% CI 1.10-2.64; 14,433 patients), and amodiaquine-sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine (AQSP): OR = 2.20; 95% CI 1.21-3.96; 8863 patients. Artesunate-amodiaquine (ASAQ) was comparable to AL (OR = 1.11; 95% CI 0.84-1.45; 21,235 patients). No significant difference was found between artesunate and mefloquine (ASMQ) and AL (OR = 1.20; 95% CI = 0.52-2.8; 13,824 participants). According to treatment ranking, among the WHO-recommended ACT medicines, DHAP was shown to be the most efficacious.ConclusionsBased on the available evidence, this study demonstrated the superiority of DHAP among currently recommended artemisinin-based combinations. The application of the methods described here may be helpful to gain better understanding of treatment efficacy and improve future decisions. However, more data are needed to allow robust conclusions about the results in comparison with novel drugs. Further surveillance of the efficacy of anti-malarial drugs and clinical trials are needed to closely follow the evolution of the epidemiology of drug-resistant malaria in Africa.

Project description:Drug-resistant epilepsy occurs in 25-30% of patients. Furthermore, treatment with a first-generation antiseizure drug (ASD) fails in 30-40% of individuals because of their intolerable adverse effects. Over the past three decades, 20 newer- (second- and third-)generation ASDs with unique mechanisms of action and pharmacokinetic profiles have been introduced into clinical practice. This advent has expanded the therapeutic armamentarium of epilepsy and broadens the choices of ASDs to match the individual patient's characteristics. In recent years, research has been focused on defining the ASD of choice for different seizure types. In 2017, the International League Against Epilepsy published a new classification for seizure types and epilepsy syndrome. This classification has been of paramount importance to accurately classify the patient's seizure type(s) and prescribe the ASD that is appropriate. A year later, the American Academy of Neurology published a new guideline for ASD selection in adult and pediatric patients with new-onset and treatment-resistant epilepsy. The guideline primarily relied on studies that compare the first-generation and second-generation ASDs, with limited data for the efficacy of third-generation drugs. While researchers have been called for investigating those drugs in future research, epilepsy specialists may wish to share their personal experiences to support the treatment guidelines. Given the rapid advances in the development of ASDs in recent years and the continuous updates in definitions, classifications, and treatment guidelines for seizure types and epilepsy syndromes, this review aims to present a complete overview of the current state of the literature about the efficacy and tolerability of ASDs and provide guidance to clinicians about selecting appropriate ASDs for initial treatment of epilepsy according to different seizure types and epilepsy syndromes based on the current literature and recent US and UK practical guidelines.

Project description:BackgroundAngiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitors (ARNI), sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i), soluble guanylate cyclase stimulators (sGCs), and the traditional golden triangle standard-of-care (SOC) are effective drugs for heart failure. We aimed to assess the efficacy of 4 interventions in these patients.MethodsPubMed, The Cochrane Library, Embase, and Web of Science databases were electronically searched to collect randomized controlled trials of 3 novel drugs in the treatment of heart failure from inception to September 1st, 2021. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data, and assessed the risk bias of included studies. Stata 16.0 software was used for network meta-analysis.ResultsA total of 17 randomized controlled trial involving 38,088 patients were included. The results of network meta-analysis: in terms of heart failure rehospitalization rate, 3 novel drugs lower than SOC [ARNI (OR = 0.77, 95% CI: 0.71-0.83), SGLT2i (OR = 0.70, 95% CI: 0.63-0.77), sGCs (OR = 0.88, 95% CI: 0.78-0.99)], and SGLT2i was also lower than sGCs (OR = 0.79, 95% CI: 0.68-0.93). In terms of all-cause mortality, ARNI was lower than SOC (OR = 0.81, 95% CI: 0.66-0.99). In terms of cardiovascular mortality, ARNI and SGLT2i was lower than SOC (ARNI [OR = 0.80, 95% CI: 0.70-0.92], SGLT2i [OR = 0.87, 95% CI: 0.76-0.99]). In terms of rates of cardiovascular death or heart failure rehospitalization, 3 novel drugs lower than SOC (ARNI [OR = 0.76, 95% CI: 0.71-0.82], SGLT2i [OR = 0.76, 95% CI: 0.70-0.82], sGCs [OR = 0.87, 95% CI: 0.78-0.97]). In terms of Kansas city cardiomyopathy questionnaire score, ARNI and SGLT2i was superior to SOC (ARNI [MD = 1.43, 95% CI: 0.43-2.42], SGLT2i [MD = 1.88, 95% CI: 1.12-2.65]). In terms of N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide outcome indexes, SGLT2i was superior to SOC (MD = -134.63, 95% CI: -237.70 to -31.56). The results of Surface under the cumulative ranking sequencing: in terms of heart failure rehospitalization rate and rates of cardiovascular death or heart failure rehospitalization, the ranking was SGLT2i>ARNI>sGCs>SOC. in terms of all-cause mortality and cardiovascular mortality, the ranking was ARN>SGLT2i>sGCs>SOC. in terms of Kansas city cardiomyopathy questionnaire score and N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide outcome indexes, the ranking was SGLT2i>ARN>SOC.ConclusionsThe available evidence suggests that all 3 novel heart failure drugs can improve the prognosis of heart failure. ARNI may be the most effective in reducing mortality, SGLT2i may be the most effective in improving quality of life, while sGCs may be inferior to ARNI and SGLT2i.

Dataset Information

Comparison for Efficacy and Tolerability among Ten Drugs for Treatment of Parkinson's Disease: A Network Meta-Analysis.

Publications

Comparison for Efficacy and Tolerability among Ten Drugs for Treatment of Parkinson's Disease: A Network Meta-Analysis.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets