Dataset Information

A pilot study to determine the feasibility of enhancing cognitive abilities in children with sensory processing dysfunction.

ABSTRACT: Children with Sensory Processing Dysfunction (SPD) experience incoming information in atypical, distracting ways. Qualitative challenges with attention have been reported in these children, but such difficulties have not been quantified using either behavioral or functional neuroimaging methods. Furthermore, the efficacy of evidence-based cognitive control interventions aimed at enhancing attention in this group has not been tested. Here we present work aimed at characterizing and enhancing attentional abilities for children with SPD. A sample of 38 SPD and 25 typically developing children were tested on behavioral, neural, and parental measures of attention before and after a 4-week iPad-based at-home cognitive remediation program. At baseline, 54% of children with SPD met or exceeded criteria on a parent report measure for inattention/hyperactivity. Significant deficits involving sustained attention, selective attention and goal management were observed only in the subset of SPD children with parent-reported inattention. This subset of children also showed reduced midline frontal theta activity, an electroencephalographic measure of attention. Following the cognitive intervention, only the SPD children with inattention/hyperactivity showed both improvements in midline frontal theta activity and on a parental report of inattention. Notably, 33% of these individuals no longer met the clinical cut-off for inattention, with the parent-reported improvements persisting for 9 months. These findings support the benefit of a targeted attention intervention for a subset of children with SPD, while simultaneously highlighting the importance of having a multifaceted assessment for individuals with neurodevelopmental conditions to optimally personalize treatment.

SUBMITTER: Anguera JA

PROVIDER: S-EPMC5381761 | biostudies-literature | 2017

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

A pilot study to determine the feasibility of enhancing cognitive abilities in children with sensory processing dysfunction.

Anguera Joaquin A JA Brandes-Aitken Anne N AN Antovich Ashley D AD Rolle Camarin E CE Desai Shivani S SS Marco Elysa J EJ

PloS one 20170405 4

Children with Sensory Processing Dysfunction (SPD) experience incoming information in atypical, distracting ways. Qualitative challenges with attention have been reported in these children, but such difficulties have not been quantified using either behavioral or functional neuroimaging methods. Furthermore, the efficacy of evidence-based cognitive control interventions aimed at enhancing attention in this group has not been tested. Here we present work aimed at characterizing and enhancing atte ...[more]

PMID: 28380008

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundTreatment development for neurodevelopmental disorders (NDDs) such as autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is impeded by heterogeneity in clinical manifestation and underlying etiologies. Symptom traits such as aberrant sensory reactivity are present across NDDs and might reflect common mechanistic pathways. Here, we test the effectiveness of repurposing a drug candidate, bumetanide, on irritable behavior in a cross-disorder neurodevelopmental cohort defined by the presence of sensory reactivity problems.MethodsParticipants, aged 5-15 years and IQ ≥ 55, with ASD, ADHD, and/or epilepsy and proven aberrant sensory reactivity according to deviant Sensory Profile scores were included. Participants were randomly allocated (1:1) to bumetanide (max 1 mg twice daily) or placebo tablets for 91 days followed by a 28-day wash-out period using permuted block design and minimization. Participants, parents, healthcare providers, and outcome assessors were blinded for treatment allocation. Primary outcome was the differences in ABC-irritability at day 91. Secondary outcomes were differences in SRS-2, RBS-R, SP-NL, BRIEF parent, BRIEF teacher at D91. Differences were analyzed in a modified intention-to-treat sample with linear mixed models and side effects in the intention-to-treat population.ResultsA total of 38 participants (10.1 [SD 3.1] years) were enrolled between June 2017 and June 2019 in the Netherlands. Nineteen children were allocated to bumetanide and nineteen to placebo. Five patients discontinued (n = 3 bumetanide). Bumetanide was superior to placebo on the ABC-irritability [mean difference (MD) -4.78, 95%CI: -8.43 to -1.13, p = 0.0125]. No effects were found on secondary endpoints. No wash-out effects were found. Side effects were as expected: hypokalemia (p = 0.046) and increased diuresis (p = 0.020).ConclusionDespite the results being underpowered, this study raises important recommendations for future cross-diagnostic trial designs.

Project description:BackgroundA variety of studies have demonstrated gains in cognitive ability following cognitive training interventions. However, other studies have not shown such gains, and questions remain regarding the efficacy of specific cognitive training interventions. Cognitive training research often involves programs made up of just one or a few exercises, targeting limited and specific cognitive endpoints. In addition, cognitive training studies typically involve small samples that may be insufficient for reliable measurement of change. Other studies have utilized training periods that were too short to generate reliable gains in cognitive performance.MethodsThe present study evaluated an online cognitive training program comprised of 49 exercises targeting a variety of cognitive capacities. The cognitive training program was compared to an active control condition in which participants completed crossword puzzles. All participants were recruited, trained, and tested online (N = 4,715 fully evaluable participants). Participants in both groups were instructed to complete one approximately 15-minute session at least 5 days per week for 10 weeks.ResultsParticipants randomly assigned to the treatment group improved significantly more on the primary outcome measure, an aggregate measure of neuropsychological performance, than did the active control group (Cohen's d effect size = 0.255; 95% confidence interval = [0.198, 0.312]). Treatment participants showed greater improvements than controls on speed of processing, short-term memory, working memory, problem solving, and fluid reasoning assessments. Participants in the treatment group also showed greater improvements on self-reported measures of cognitive functioning, particularly on those items related to concentration compared to the control group (Cohen's d = 0.249; 95% confidence interval = [0.191, 0.306]).ConclusionTaken together, these results indicate that a varied training program composed of a number of tasks targeted to different cognitive functions can show transfer to a wide range of untrained measures of cognitive performance.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT-02367898.

Project description:INTRODUCTION:An increasing number of young men have been found to develop nonorganic erectile dysfunction (NOED) in recent years. The NOED has been shown to respond better to cognitive behavior sex therapy (CBST) in a few past studies. AIM:The present research aims to establish the efficacy of CBST as a promising treatment option in young men suffering from NOED by administering a feasibility pilot trial. METHODS:28 young men (M = 31 years) out of a total of 39 men (7 excluded, 4 quit treatment) diagnosed with NOED from sexual health clinics in Pakistan were recruited to receive CBST treatment (n = 13) on average twice a week for a period of 50 minutes per session for a period of 4, 6, 8, and 12 weeks for the mild, mild to moderate, moderate, and severe forms of NOED, respectively, and sildenafil citrate group (n = 15) receiving sildenafil citrate 50 mg on demand. The trial design was sequential random assignment clinical trial. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES:International Index of Erectile Functoning-5 and Depression Anxiety Stress Scale-21 were used before treatment, after treatment, and in follow-up as the main outcome measures. RESULTS:The repeated measures analysis of covariance established a nonsignificant difference between CBST and sildenafil citrate 50 mg in NOED scores improvement, NOED severity reduction, and reduction in depression scores at posttreatment assessment. There were significant differences among different CBST modalities in improving NOED scores, reduction in NOED severity, and depression scores. There was significant difference in CBST and sildenafil citrate 50 mg in anxiety reduction at posttreatment assessment. The covariates age, age groups, and NOED duration did not significantly impact the treatment outcome for both treatment groups except age which impacted the interaction of treatment and anxiety scores. CONCLUSION:The CBST is an emerging and promising treatment choice in younger men suffering from NOED. Bilal A, Abbasi NuH. Cognitive Behavioral Sex Therapy: An Emerging Treatment Option for Nonorganic Erectile Dysfunction in Young Men: A Feasibility Pilot Study. J Sex Med 2020;8:396-407.

Dataset Information

A pilot study to determine the feasibility of enhancing cognitive abilities in children with sensory processing dysfunction.

Publications

A pilot study to determine the feasibility of enhancing cognitive abilities in children with sensory processing dysfunction.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets