Dataset Information

Effect of prescribing metformin according to eGFR instead of serum creatinine level: A study based on Korean National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (KNHANES) 2009-2014.

ABSTRACT:

Background

The metformin label has recently been changed from serum creatinine (sCr)-based to estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR)-based indication, which is expected to expand its use for patients with mild renal insufficiency. However, because the sCr level is lower in Asians than in Caucasians at the same level of renal function, this change might not expand metformin use in the Asian population. We investigated the effect of this change among Korean patients with diabetes.

Methods

Data from the Korean National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2009 to 2014 were used and included 4,127 adult patients with diabetes. The metformin eligibility was assessed by the sCr level (1.4 mg/dL for women and 1.5 mg/dL for men) or by eGFR categories (contraindicated, <30; indeterminate, ?30, <45; likely safe, ?45 mL/min/1.73 m2) calculated by various eGFR equations including MDRD equation. We designated the 'expanding' and 'contracting' population as those who are likely safe according to eGFR among sCr-ineligible patients and those contraindicated according to eGFR among sCr-eligible patients, respectively. Results were weighted to the whole Korean adult population.

Results

All eGFR equations showed expansion in the population for whom metformin is likely safe, ranging from 14.3% to 19.9% of the sCr-ineligible population. With the MDRD equation, the expanding population was 15,264 (15.8%) and the contracting population was 0 (0.0%). Male sex and younger age were significantly associated with the expanding population.

Conclusions

Contrary to our concern, prescribing metformin according to eGFR substantially expanded the indication of its use among the Korean diabetic patients.

SUBMITTER: Moon SJ

PROVIDER: S-EPMC5388489 | biostudies-literature | 2017

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Effect of prescribing metformin according to eGFR instead of serum creatinine level: A study based on Korean National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (KNHANES) 2009-2014.

Moon Sun Joon SJ Ahn Chang Ho CH Cho Young Min YM

PloS one 20170411 4

<h4>Background</h4>The metformin label has recently been changed from serum creatinine (sCr)-based to estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR)-based indication, which is expected to expand its use for patients with mild renal insufficiency. However, because the sCr level is lower in Asians than in Caucasians at the same level of renal function, this change might not expand metformin use in the Asian population. We investigated the effect of this change among Korean patients with diabetes.<h4> ...[more]

PMID: 28399132

Similar Datasets

Project description:ObjectiveMany societies recommend using estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) rather than serum creatinine (sCr) to determine metformin eligibility. We examined the potential impact of these recommendations on metformin eligibility among U.S. adults.Research design and methodsMetformin eligibility was assessed among 3,902 adults with diabetes who participated in the 1999-2010 National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys and reported routine access to health care, using conventional sCr thresholds (eligible if <1.4 mg/dL for women and <1.5 mg/dL for men) and eGFR categories: likely safe, ≥45 mL/min/1.73 m(2); contraindicated, <30 mL/min/1.73 m(2); and indeterminate, 30-44 mL/min/1.73 m(2)). Different eGFR equations were used: four-variable MDRD, Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) creatinine (CKD-EPIcr), and CKD-EPI cystatin C, as well as Cockcroft-Gault (CG) to estimate creatinine clearance (CrCl). Diabetes was defined by self-report or A1C ≥6.5% (48 mmol/mol). We used logistic regression to identify populations for whom metformin was likely safe adjusted for age, race/ethnicity, and sex. Results were weighted to the U.S. adult population.ResultsAmong adults with sCr above conventional cutoffs, MDRD eGFR ≥45 mL/min/1.73 m(2) was most common among men (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 33.3 [95% CI 7.4-151.5] vs. women) and non-Hispanic Blacks (aOR vs. whites 14.8 [4.27-51.7]). No individuals with sCr below conventional cutoffs had an MDRD eGFR <30 mL/min/1.73 m(2). All estimating equations expanded the population of individuals for whom metformin is likely safe, ranging from 86,900 (CKD-EPIcr) to 834,800 (CG). All equations identified larger populations with eGFR 30-44 mL/min/1.73 m(2), for whom metformin safety is indeterminate, ranging from 784,700 (CKD-EPIcr) to 1,636,000 (CG).ConclusionsThe use of eGFR or CrCl to determine metformin eligibility instead of sCr can expand the adult population with diabetes for whom metformin is likely safe, particularly among non-Hispanic blacks and men.

Dataset Information

Effect of prescribing metformin according to eGFR instead of serum creatinine level: A study based on Korean National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (KNHANES) 2009-2014.

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Publications

Effect of prescribing metformin according to eGFR instead of serum creatinine level: A study based on Korean National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (KNHANES) 2009-2014.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets