Dataset Information

Early identification of patients requiring massive transfusion, embolization, or hemostatic surgery for traumatic hemorrhage: a systematic review protocol.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Hemorrhage is a major cause of early mortality following a traumatic injury. The progression and consequences of significant blood loss occur quickly as death from hemorrhagic shock or exsanguination often occurs within the first few hours. The mainstay of treatment therefore involves early identification of patients at risk for hemorrhagic shock in order to provide blood products and control of the bleeding source if necessary. The intended scope of this review is to identify and assess combinations of predictors informing therapeutic decision-making for clinicians during the initial trauma assessment. The primary objective of this systematic review is to identify and critically assess any existing multivariable models predicting significant traumatic hemorrhage that requires intervention, defined as a composite outcome comprising massive transfusion, surgery for hemostasis, or angiography with embolization for the purpose of external validation or updating in other study populations. If no suitable existing multivariable models are identified, the secondary objective is to identify candidate predictors to inform the development of a new prediction rule.

Methods

We will search the EMBASE and MEDLINE databases for all randomized controlled trials and prospective and retrospective cohort studies developing or validating predictors of intervention for traumatic hemorrhage in adult patients 16 years of age or older. Eligible predictors must be available to the clinician during the first hour of trauma resuscitation and may be clinical, lab-based, or imaging-based. Outcomes of interest include the need for surgical intervention, angiographic embolization, or massive transfusion within the first 24 h. Data extraction will be performed independently by two reviewers. Items for extraction will be based on the CHARMS checklist. We will evaluate any existing models for relevance, quality, and the potential for external validation and updating in other populations. Relevance will be described in terms of appropriateness of outcomes and predictors. Quality criteria will include variable selection strategies, adequacy of sample size, handling of missing data, validation techniques, and measures of model performance.

Discussion

This systematic review will describe the availability of multivariable prediction models and summarize evidence regarding predictors that can be used to identify the need for intervention in patients with traumatic hemorrhage.

Systematic review registration

PROSPERO CRD42017054589.

SUBMITTER: Tran A

PROVIDER: S-EPMC5390372 | biostudies-literature | 2017 Apr

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Early identification of patients requiring massive transfusion, embolization, or hemostatic surgery for traumatic hemorrhage: a systematic review protocol.

Tran Alexandre A Matar Maher M Steyerberg Ewout W EW Lampron Jacinthe J Taljaard Monica M Vaillancourt Christian C

Systematic reviews 20170413 1

<h4>Background</h4>Hemorrhage is a major cause of early mortality following a traumatic injury. The progression and consequences of significant blood loss occur quickly as death from hemorrhagic shock or exsanguination often occurs within the first few hours. The mainstay of treatment therefore involves early identification of patients at risk for hemorrhagic shock in order to provide blood products and control of the bleeding source if necessary. The intended scope of this review is to identify ...[more]

PMID: 28407781

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundBoth groups A and AB plasma have been approved for emergency-release transfusion in acutely bleeding trauma patients before blood grouping being performed. The safety profile associated with this practice has not been well characterized, particularly in patients requiring massive transfusion.MethodsThis secondary analysis of the Pragmatic, Randomized, Optimal Platelet and Plasma Ratios trial examined whether exposure to group A emergency-release plasma (ERP) was noninferior to group AB ERP. We also examined patients whose blood groups were compatible with group A ERP versus patients whose blood groups were incompatible with group A ERP. Outcomes included 30-day mortality and complication rates including systemic inflammatory response syndrome, infection, renal injury, pulmonary dysfunction, and thromboembolism.ResultsOf the 680 patients predicted to receive a massive transfusion, 584 (85.9%) received at least 1 U of ERP. Of the 584 patients analyzed, 462 (79.1%) received group AB and 122 (20.9%) received group A ERP. Using a hazard ratio (HR) of 1.35 as the noninferiority margin, transfusion with group A versus group AB ERP was not associated with increased thromboembolic rates (HR, 0.52; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.31-0.90). Mortality (HR, 1.15; 95% CI, 0.91-1.45) and nonfatal complication rates (HR, 1.24; 95% CI, 0.87-1.77) were inconclusive. In the subgroup analysis, transfusion with incompatible ERP (group B or AB patients receiving group A ERP) was not associated with increased nonfatal complications (HR, 1.02; 95% CI, 0.80-1.30). There were no reported hemolytic transfusion reactions.ConclusionThe use of ERP is common in patients requiring massive transfusion and facilitates the rapid balanced resuscitation of patients who have sustained blood loss. Group A ERP is an acceptable option for patients requiring massive transfusion, especially if group AB ERP is not readily available.Level of evidenceTherapeutic/Care Management, level IV; Prognostic, level III.

Project description:BackgroundPostpartum hemorrhage is a leading cause of maternal morbidity and mortality in the United States and disproportionately affects pregnant persons of color.ObjectiveThis study aimed to identify the demographic and obstetrical characteristics of those who received different levels of antihemorrhagic intervention in the setting of severe postpartum hemorrhage requiring blood transfusion.Study designThis was a retrospective cohort study of patients with documented postpartum hemorrhage (estimated blood loss of ≥1000 mL) and blood product transfusion. Moreover, 3 levels of antihemorrhagic intervention were defined as follows: level 1, administration of uterotonics only; level 2, performance of a procedure (ie, B-Lynch suture, O'Leary stitch, Bakri balloon, dilation and curettage, laceration repair, or embolization); and level 3, hysterectomy. Maternal demographics, obstetrical characteristics, and comorbidities were extracted from electronic health records. Ordinal logistic regression was used to estimate the odds of higher intervention levels adjusting for maternal demographic and obstetrical characteristics.ResultsOf note, 365 patients were included in this study, with a racial or ethnic composition of 30% White, 42% Black, 18% Hispanic, and 10% other. Moreover, 233 patients (64%) received level 1 intervention, 98 patients (27%) received level 2 intervention, and 34 patients (9%) received level 3 intervention. Patients receiving higher levels of intervention were more likely to have greater estimated blood loss (P<.001), have more transfusions (P<.001), and be of advanced maternal age (P=.004). Black and Hispanic patients were less likely to have received higher levels of intervention than White patients (P=.034). After adjusting for estimated blood loss, advanced maternal age, placenta accreta spectrum, and fibroids, Black patients remained significantly less likely to receive higher levels of intervention (adjusted odds ratio, 0.55; 95% confidence interval, 0.30-0.98). This difference persisted at an estimated blood loss of ≥3000 mL, with Black and Hispanic patients being significantly less likely to receive higher levels of intervention than White patients (odds ratio, 0.31 [95% confidence interval, 0.10-0.92] and 0.10 [95% confidence interval, 0.01-0.53], respectively).ConclusionAmong patients experiencing postpartum hemorrhage and receiving transfusion, Black patients are less likely to receive higher levels of antihemorrhagic intervention. This disparity is concerning in this high-risk population and requires further attention and investigation.

Dataset Information

Early identification of patients requiring massive transfusion, embolization, or hemostatic surgery for traumatic hemorrhage: a systematic review protocol.

Background

Methods

Discussion

Systematic review registration

Publications

Early identification of patients requiring massive transfusion, embolization, or hemostatic surgery for traumatic hemorrhage: a systematic review protocol.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets