Dataset Information

Patient- and family-centered performance measures focused on actionable processes of care for persistent and chronic critical illness: protocol for a systematic review.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Approximately 5 to 10% of critically ill patients transition from acute critical illness to a state of persistent and in some cases chronic critical illness. These patients have unique and complex needs that require a change in the clinical management plan and overall goals of care to a focus on rehabilitation, symptom relief, discharge planning, and in some cases, end-of-life care. However, existing indicators and measures of care quality, and tools such as checklists, that foster implementation of best practices, may not be sufficiently inclusive in terms of actionable processes of care relevant to these patients. Therefore, the aim of this systematic review is to identify the processes of care, performance measures, quality indicators, and outcomes including reports of patient/family experience described in the current evidence base relevant to patients with persistent or chronic critical illness and their family members.

Methods

Two authors will independently search from inception to November 2016: MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, PROSPERO, the Joanna Briggs Institute and the International Clinical Trials Registry Platform. We will include all study designs except case series/reports of <10 patients describing their study population (aged 18 years and older) using terms such as persistent critical illness, chronic critical illness, and prolonged mechanical ventilation. Two authors will independently perform data extraction and complete risk of bias assessment. Our primary outcome is to determine actionable processes of care and interventions deemed relevant to patients experiencing persistent or chronic critical illness and their family members. Secondary outcomes include (1) performance measures and quality indicators considered relevant to our population of interest and (2) themes related to patient and family experience.

Discussion

We will use our systematic review findings, with data from patient, family member and clinician interviews, and a subsequent consensus building process to inform the development of quality metrics and tools to measure processes of care, outcomes and experience for patients experiencing persistent or chronic critical illness and their family members.

Systematic review registration

PROSPERO CRD42016052715.

SUBMITTER: Rose L

PROVIDER: S-EPMC5392946 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:To identify actionable processes of care, quality indicators, or performance measures and their evidence base relevant to patients with persistent or chronic critical illness and their family members including themes relating to patient/family experience. Data Sources:Two authors independently searched electronic, systemic review, and trial registration databases (inception to November 2016). Study Selection:We included studies with an ICU length of stay of greater than or equal to 7 days as an inclusion criterion and reported actionable processes of care; quality improvement indicators, measures, or tools; or patient/family experience. We excluded case series/reports of less than 10 patients. Data Extraction:Paired authors independently extracted data and performed risk of bias assessment. Data Synthesis:We screened 13,130 references identifying 114 primary studies and 102 relevant reviews. Primary studies reported data on 24,252 participants; median (interquartile range) sample size of 70 (32-182). We identified 42 distinct actionable processes of care, the most commonly investigated related to categories of 1) weaning methods (21 studies; 27 reviews); 2) rehabilitation, mobilization, and physiotherapy (20 studies; 40 reviews); and 3) provision of information, prognosis, and family communication (14 studies; 11 reviews). Processes with limited evidence were generally more patient-centered categories such as communication, promotion of sleep, symptom management, or family support. Of the 21 randomized controlled trials, only two were considered at low risk of bias across all six domains, whereas just two cohort studies and one qualitative study were considered of high quality. Conclusions:We identified 42 distinct actionable processes of care relevant to patients with persistent or chronic critical illness and their families, with most frequently studied processes relating to weaning, rehabilitation/mobilization, and family communication. Qualitative studies highlighted the need to address psychologic needs and distressing symptoms as well as enabling patient communication. Our findings are informative for clinicians and decision-makers when planning high-quality patient and family-focused care.

Project description:PurposePatients with persistent critical illness may account for up to half of all intensive care unit (ICU) bed-days. It is unknown if there is hospital variation in the development of persistent critical illness and if hospital performance affects the incidence of persistent critical illness.MethodsThis is a retrospective analysis of Veterans admitted to the Veterans Administration (VA) ICUs from 2015 to 2017. Hospital performance was defined by the risk- and reliability-adjusted 30-day mortality. Persistent critical illness was defined as an ICU length of stay of at least 11 days. We used 2-level multilevel logistic regression models to assess variation in risk- and reliability-adjusted probabilities in the development of persistent critical illness.ResultsIn the analysis of 100 hospitals which encompassed 153,512 hospitalizations, 4.9% (N = 7640/153,512) developed persistent critical illness. There was variation in the development of persistent critical illness despite controlling for patient characteristics (intraclass correlation: 0.067, 95% CI 0.049-0.091). Hospitals with higher risk- and reliability-adjusted 30-day mortality had higher probabilities of developing persistent critical illness (predicted probability: 0.057, 95% CI 0.051-0.063, p < 0.01) compared to those with lower risk- and reliability-adjusted 30-day mortality (predicted probability: 0.046, 95% CI 0.041-0.051, p < 0.01). The median odds ratio was 1.4 (95% CI 1.33-1.49) implying that, for two patients with the same physiology on admission at two different VA hospitals, the patient admitted to the hospital with higher adjusted mortality would have 40% greater odds of developing persistent critical illness.ConclusionHospitals with higher risk- and reliability-adjusted 30-day mortality have a higher probability of developing persistent critical illness. Understanding the drivers of this variation may identify modifiable factors contributing to the development of persistent critical illness.

Project description:BackgroundFollowing trauma, persistent inflammation, immunosuppression, and catabolism may characterize delayed recovery or failure to recover. Understanding the metabolic response associated with these adverse outcomes may facilitate earlier identification and intervention. We characterized the metabolic profiles of trauma victims who died or developed chronic critical illness (CCI) and hypothesized that differences would be evident within 1-week postinjury.MethodsVenous blood samples from trauma victims with shock who survived at least 7 days were analyzed using mass spectrometry. Subjects who died or developed CCI (intensive care unit length of stay of ≥14 days with persistent organ dysfunction) were compared with subjects who recovered rapidly (intensive care unit length of stay, ≤7 days) and uninjured controls. We used partial least squares discriminant analysis, t tests, linear mixed effects regression, and pathway enrichment analyses to make broad comparisons and identify differences in metabolite concentrations and pathways.ResultsWe identified 27 patients who died or developed CCI and 33 who recovered rapidly. Subjects were predominantly male (65%) with a median age of 53 years and Injury Severity Score of 36. Healthy controls (n = 48) had similar age and sex distributions. Overall, from the 163 metabolites detected in the samples, 56 metabolites and 21 pathways differed between injury outcome groups, and partial least squares discriminant analysis models distinguished injury outcome groups as early as 1-day postinjury. Differences were observed in tryptophan, phenylalanine, and tyrosine metabolism; metabolites associated with oxidative stress via methionine metabolism; inflammatory mediators including kynurenine, arachidonate, and glucuronic acid; and products of the gut microbiome including indole-3-propionate.ConclusionsThe metabolic profiles in subjects who ultimately die or develop CCI differ from those who have recovered. In particular, we have identified differences in markers of inflammation, oxidative stress, amino acid metabolism, and alterations in the gut microbiome. Targeted metabolomics has the potential to identify important metabolic changes postinjury to improve early diagnosis and targeted intervention.Level of evidencePrognostic/epidemiologic, level III.

Project description:BACKGROUND:Persistent critical illness is common in critically ill patients and is associated with vast medical resource use and poor clinical outcomes. This study aimed to define when patients with sepsis would be stabilized and transitioned to persistent critical illness, and whether such transition time varies between latent classes of patients. METHODS:This was a retrospective cohort study involving sepsis patients in the eICU Collaborative Research Database. Persistent critical illness was defined at the time when acute physiological characteristics were no longer more predictive of in-hospital mortality (i.e., vital status at hospital discharge) than antecedent characteristics. Latent growth mixture modeling was used to identify distinct trajectory classes by using Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score measured during intensive care unit stay as the outcome, and persistent critical illness transition time was explored in each latent class. RESULTS:The mortality was 16.7% (3828/22,868) in the study cohort. Acute physiological model was no longer more predictive of in-hospital mortality than antecedent characteristics at 15?days after intensive care unit admission in the overall population. Only a minority of the study subjects (n?=?643, 2.8%) developed persistent critical illness, but they accounted for 19% (15,834/83,125) and 10% (19,975/198,833) of the total intensive care unit and hospital bed-days, respectively. Five latent classes were identified. Classes 1 and 2 showed increasing Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score over time and transition to persistent critical illness occurred at 16 and 27?days, respectively. The remaining classes showed a steady decline in Sequential Organ Failure Assessment scores and the transition to persistent critical illness occurred between 6 and 8?days. Elevated urea-to-creatinine ratio was a good biochemical signature of persistent critical illness. CONCLUSIONS:While persistent critical illness occurred in a minority of patients with sepsis, it consumed vast medical resources. The transition time differs substantially across latent classes, indicating that the allocation of medical resources should be tailored to different classes of patients.