Unknown

Dataset Information

0

OnabotulinumtoxinA vs Sacral Neuromodulation on Refractory Urgency Urinary Incontinence in Women: A Randomized Clinical Trial.


ABSTRACT: Importance:Women with refractory urgency urinary incontinence are treated with sacral neuromodulation and onabotulinumtoxinA with limited comparative information. Objective:To assess whether onabotulinumtoxinA is superior to sacral neuromodulation in controlling refractory episodes of urgency urinary incontinence. Design, Setting, and Participants:Multicenter open-label randomized trial (February 2012-January 2015) at 9 US medical centers involving 381 women with refractory urgency urinary incontinence. Interventions:Cystoscopic intradetrusor injection of 200 U of onabotulinumtoxinA (n?=?192) or sacral neuromodulation (n?=?189). Main Outcomes and Measures:Primary outcome, change from baseline mean number of daily urgency urinary incontinence episodes over 6 months, was measured with monthly 3-day diaries. Secondary outcomes included change from baseline in urinary symptom scores in the Overactive Bladder Questionnaire Short Form (SF); range, 0-100, higher scores indicating worse symptoms; Overactive Bladder Satisfaction questionnaire; range, 0-100; includes 5 subscales, higher scores indicating better satisfaction; and adverse events. Results:Of the 364 women (mean [SD] age, 63.0 [11.6] years) in the intention-to-treat population, 190 women in the onabotulinumtoxinA group had a greater reduction in 6-month mean number of episodes of urgency incontinence per day than did the 174 in the sacral neuromodulation group (-3.9 vs -3.3 episodes per day; mean difference, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.13 to 1.14; P?=?.01). Participants treated with onabotulinumtoxinA showed greater improvement in the Overactive Bladder Questionnaire SF for symptom bother (-46.7 vs -38.6; mean difference, 8.1; 95% CI, 3.0 to 13.3; P?=?.002); treatment satisfaction (67.7 vs 59.8; mean difference, 7.8; 95% CI, 1.6 to 14.1; P?=?.01) and treatment endorsement (78.1 vs 67.6; mean difference; 10.4, 95% CI, 4.3 to 16.5; P?

SUBMITTER: Amundsen CL 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC5399419 | biostudies-literature | 2016 Oct

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

OnabotulinumtoxinA vs Sacral Neuromodulation on Refractory Urgency Urinary Incontinence in Women: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Amundsen Cindy L CL   Richter Holly E HE   Menefee Shawn A SA   Komesu Yuko M YM   Arya Lily A LA   Gregory W Thomas WT   Myers Deborah L DL   Zyczynski Halina M HM   Vasavada Sandip S   Nolen Tracy L TL   Wallace Dennis D   Meikle Susan F SF  

JAMA 20161001 13


<h4>Importance</h4>Women with refractory urgency urinary incontinence are treated with sacral neuromodulation and onabotulinumtoxinA with limited comparative information.<h4>Objective</h4>To assess whether onabotulinumtoxinA is superior to sacral neuromodulation in controlling refractory episodes of urgency urinary incontinence.<h4>Design, setting, and participants</h4>Multicenter open-label randomized trial (February 2012-January 2015) at 9 US medical centers involving 381 women with refractory  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC5534324 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC3543828 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC4128900 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5803754 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC4439377 | biostudies-literature