Dataset Information

Erythropoiesis-stimulating agent dosing, haemoglobin and ferritin levels in UK haemodialysis patients 2005-13.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) with intravenous iron supplementation are the main treatment for anaemia in patients with chronic kidney disease. Although observational studies suggest better outcomes for patients who achieve higher haemoglobin (Hb) levels, randomized controlled trials comparing higher and lower Hb targets have led to safety concerns over higher targets and to changes in treatment guidelines.

Methods

Quarterly data from 2005 to 2013 were obtained on 28 936 haemodialysis patients from the UK Renal Registry. We examined trends in ESA use and average dose, Hb and ferritin values over time and Hb according to the UK Renal Association guideline range.

Results

The average ESA dose declined over time, with sharper decreases of epoetin seen towards the end of 2006 and from 2009. Average Hb for patients on ESAs was 114.1 g/L [95% confidence interval (CI) 113.7, 114.6] in the first quarter of 2005, which decreased to 109.6 g/L (95% CI 109.3, 109.9) by the end of 2013. Average serum ferritin was 353 µg/L (95% CI 345, 360) at the start of 2005, increasing to 386 µg/L (95% CI 380, 392) in the final quarter of 2013. The percentage of patients with Hb in the range of 100-120 g/L increased from 46.1 at the start of 2005 to 57.6 at the end of 2013.

Conclusions

Anaemia management patterns for haemodialysis patients changed in the UK between 2005 and 2013. These patterns most likely reflect clinician response to emerging trial evidence and practice guidelines. Registries play an important role in continued observation of anaemia management and will monitor further changes as new evidence on optimal care emerges.

SUBMITTER: Birnie K

PROVIDER: S-EPMC5410985 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:Background and objectivesAnemia management changed substantially among dialysis patients in the United States around the time of implementation of the new Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services bundled payment system and erythropoiesis-stimulating agent (ESA) label change in 2011. Among these, average ferritin levels increased dramatically and have remained high since; this study sought to gain understanding of this sustained rise in ferritin levels.Design, setting, participants, & measurementsTrends in mean ferritin, hemoglobin, IV iron dose, and ESA dose from 2009 to 2013 were examined in 9735 patients from 91 United States Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study facilities. Linear mixed models were used to assess the extent to which intravenous (IV) iron and ESA dose accounted for patients' changes in ferritin over time.ResultsMean ESA dose and hemoglobin levels declined throughout the study. Mean IV iron dose increased from 210 mg/mo in 2009-2010 to a peak of 280 mg/mo in 2011, then declined back to 200 mg/mo and remained stable from 2012 to 2013. Mean ferritin increased from 601 ng/ml in the third quarter of 2009 to 887 ng/ml in the first quarter of 2012; models suggest that higher IV iron dosing was a primary determinant during 2011, but lower ESA doses contributed to the sustained high ferritin levels thereafter. In a subset of 17 facilities that decreased IV iron dose in 2011, mean ferritin rose by 120 ng/ml to 764 ng/ml, which appeared to be primarily due to ESA reduction. Together, changes in IV iron and ESA doses accounted for 46% of the increase in ferritin over the study period.ConclusionsIn contrast to expectations, the rise in average IV iron dose did not persist beyond 2011. The sustained rise in ferritin levels in United States dialysis patients after policy changes in 2011, to average levels well in excess of 800 ng/ml, appeared to be partly due to reductions in ESA dosing and not solely IV iron dosing practices. The effect of these changes in ferritin on health outcomes requires further investigation.

Project description:Rationale & objectiveSince the change in erythropoiesis-stimulating agent (ESA) labeling and bundling of dialysis services in the United States, few studies have addressed the clinical importance of ESA hyporesponsiveness and none have considered health care resource use in this population. We aimed to further explore ESA hyporesponsiveness and its consequences.Study designRetrospective observational cohort study.Setting & participantsUS Renal Data System Medicare participants receiving dialysis with a minimum 6 months of continuous ESA use from 2012 to 2014.PredictorsErythropoietin resistance index (≥2.0 U/kg/wk/g/L) and ESA dose were used to identify ESA hyporesponders and hyporesponsive subgroups: isolated, intermittent, and chronic.OutcomesAssociations between ESA responsiveness and mortality, cardiovascular hospitalization rates, and health care resource use were evaluated and compared across subgroups.Analytical approachBaseline characteristics were compared using Wilcoxon rank sum tests for continuous variables and χ2 tests for categorical variables. Incidence rates of health care resource use were modeled using an unadjusted and adjusted generalized linear model.ResultsOf 834,115 dialysis patients in the CROWNWeb database, 38,891 ESA hyporesponders and 59,412 normoresponders met all inclusion criteria. Compared with normoresponders, hyporesponders were younger women, weighed less, and had longer durations of dialysis (all P < 0.001). Hyporesponders received 3.8-fold higher ESA doses (mean, 94,831 U/mo) and erythropoietin resistance index was almost 5 times higher than in normoresponders. Hyporesponders had lower hemoglobin levels and parathyroid hormone levels > 800 pg/mL, and iron deficiency was present in 26.5% versus 10.9% in normoresponders. One-year mortality was higher among hypo- compared with normoresponders (25.3% vs 22.6%). Hyporesponders also had significantly higher rates of hospitalization for cardiovascular events, emergency department visits, inpatient stays, home health agency visits, skilled nursing facility, and hospice days.LimitationsOnly US Medicare patients were included and different hyporesponder definitions may have influenced the results.ConclusionsThis study explored ESA hyporesponsiveness using new definitions and incorporated clinical and economic outcomes. It established that ESA-hyporesponsive dialysis patients had higher mortality, cardiovascular hospitalization rates, and health care costs as compared with ESA-normoresponsive patients.