Dataset Information

Prognostic value of tumor mutations in radically treated locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients.

ABSTRACT:

Introduction

Chemo-radiation is standard treatment in locally advanced non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLC). The prognostic value of mutations has been poorly explored in this population.

Results

Clinical data were collected from 190 patients and mutational profiles were obtained in 78 of them; 58 (74%) were males, 31 (40%) current smokers, 47/31 stage IIIA/IIIB and 40 (51%) adenocarcinoma. The following mutations were identified: EGFR 12% (9/78), KRAS 15% (12/78), BRAF 5% (3/65), PI3KCA 2% (1/57), NRAS 3% (1/32), and ALK+ (FISH) 4% (2/51). HER2 was not detected. Median follow-up was 3.1 years. Overall survival was evaluated by group; no significant differences were identified in median overall survival (p = 0.21), with 29.4 months for the EGFR/ALK group (n = 11), 12.8 months for other mutations (n = 17), and 23.4 months for wild-type (n = 50). The EGFR/ALK and other mutations groups had poorer median progression-free survival (9.6 and 6.0 months) compared to the wild-type group (12.0 months; multivariate hazard ratio 2.0 [95% CI, 0.9-4.2] and 2.8 [95% CI, 1.5-5.2] respectively, p = 0.003).

Materials and methods

We retrospectively reviewed all patients receiving radical treatment for locally advanced NSCLC in a single institution between January 2002 and June 2013. Next generation sequencing was performed on DNA from paraffin-embedded tissue. ALK rearrangements were detected by immunohistochemistry and/or FISH. Mutational prognostic value for Kaplan-Meier survival parameters was determined by log-rank tests and Cox proportional hazards models.

Conclusions

Selected gene alterations may be associated with poorer progression-free survival in locally advanced radically treated NSCLC and their prognostic and/or predictive value merits further evaluation in a larger population.

SUBMITTER: Boros A

PROVIDER: S-EPMC5421921 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:INTRODUCTION:To observe the early change of metabolic tumor heterogeneity during chemoradiotherapy and to determine its prognostic value for patients with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS:From January 2007 to March 2010, 58 patients with NSCLC were included who were received 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) PET/CT before and following 40 Gy radiotherapy with the concurrent cisplatin-based chemotherapy (CCRT). Primary tumor FDG uptake heterogeneity was determined using global and local scale textural features extracted from standardized uptake value (SUV) histogram analysis (coefficient of variation [COV], skewness, kurtosis, area under the curve of the cumulative SUV histogram [AUC-CSH]) and normalized gray-level co-occurrence matrix (contrast, dissimilarity, entropy, homogeneity). SUVmax and metabolic tumor volume (MTV) were also evaluated. Correlations were analyzed between parameters on baseline or during treatments with tumor response, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). RESULTS:Compared with non-responders, responders showed significantly greater pre-treatment COV, contrast and MTV (AUC = 0.781, 0.804, 0.686, respectively). Receiver-operating-characteristic curve analysis showed that early change of tumor textural analysis serves as a response predictor with higher sensitivity (73.2%~92.1%) and specificity (80.0%~83.6%) than baseline parameters. Change in AUC-CSH and dissimilarity during CCRT could also predict response with optimal cut-off values (33.0% and 28.7%, respectively). The patients with greater changes in contrast and AUC-CSH had significantly higher 5-year OS (P = 0.008, P = 0.034) and PFS (P = 0.007, P = 0.039). In multivariate analysis, only change in contrast was found as the independent prognostic factor of PFS (HR 0.476, P = 0.021) and OS (HR 0.519, P = 0.015). CONCLUSIONS:The metabolic tumor heterogeneity change during CCRT characterized by global and local scale textural features may be valuable for predicting treatment response and survival for patients with locally advanced NSCLC.

Project description:ImportancePrevious studies have suggested the importance of the baseline derived neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (dNLR) and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) level as prognostic markers. The lung immune prognostic index (LIPI) was shown to be associated with progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) among patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (mNSCLC) treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) but not cytotoxic chemotherapy (CCT).ObjectiveTo determine whether the LIPI is associated with long-term outcomes in pooled analyses of clinical studies of ICI and targeted therapy (TT) for patients with mNSCLC.Design, setting, and participantsAn exploratory pooled analysis was performed of the LIPI on data from 11 randomized clinical multinational trials evaluating ICIs and TT submitted to the US Food and Drug Administration between January 1, 2013, and December 31, 2017, for 4914 patients with mNSCLC. Lung immune prognostic index scores were calculated based on the dNLR and the LDH level per previous publications to generate good, intermediate, and poor composite scores. Multivariable Cox proportional PFS and OS hazard ratios were generated for the dNLR, the LDH level, age, smoking status, histologic characteristics, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance score.Main outcomes and measuresOverall survival and PFS and their association with good, intermediate, or poor prognostic LIPI scores.ResultsEleven mNSCLC randomized trials were analyzed, including 3987 patients with available data. In 5 ICI trials comprising 2440 patients, 1368 patients received ICIs and 1072 patients received CCT. In 6 TT trials comprising 1547 patients, 1110 patients received TT and 437 patients received CCT. A good LIPI score was associated with better OS among patients receiving ICIs (hazard ratio, 0.34; 95% CI, 0.28-0.42), TT (hazard ratio, 0.28; 95% CI, 0.21-0.37), and CCT (hazard ratio, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.40-0.60 in ICI trials; hazard ratio, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.27-0.61 in TT trials) than those with poor LIPI scores. Similar findings were observed in terms of PFS (ICIs: hazard ratio, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.48-0.72; TT: hazard ratio, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.37-0.57; and CCT: hazard ratio, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.45-0.68 in ICI trials; hazard ratio, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.38-0.69 in TT trials).Conclusions and relevanceThe baseline LDH level and dNLR are important prognostic biomarkers irrespective of treatment modality for patients with mNSCLC. As further prospective clinical trial information is collected, the role of the LIPI score can be better defined.