Dataset Information

Stereotactic radiosurgery vs. fractionated radiotherapy for tumor control in vestibular schwannoma patients: a systematic review.

ABSTRACT:

Objective

Repeated controlled studies have revealed that stereotactic radiosurgery is better than microsurgery for patients with vestibular schwannoma (VS) <3 cm in need of intervention. In this systematic review we aimed to compare results from single-fraction stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) to fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (FSRT) for patients with VS.

Data sources and eligibility criteria

We systematically searched MEDLINE, Web of Science, Embase and Cochrane and screened relevant articles for references. Publications from 1995 through 2014 with a minimum of 50 adult (>18 years) patients with unilateral VS, followed for a median of >5 years, were eligible for inclusion. After screening titles and abstracts of the 1094 identified articles and systematically reviewing 98 of these articles, 19 were included.

Intervention

Patients with unilateral VS treated with radiosurgery were compared to patients treated with fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy.

Results

No randomized controlled trial (RCT) was identified. None of the identified controlled studies comparing SRS with FSRT were eligible according to the inclusion criteria. Nineteen case series on SRS (n = 17) and FSRT (n = 2) were included in the systematic review. Loss of tumor control necessitating a new VS-targeted intervention was found in an average of 5.0% of the patients treated with SRS and in 4.8% treated with FSRT. Mean deterioration ratio for patients with serviceable hearing before treatment was 49% for SRS and 45% for FSRT, respectively. The risk for facial nerve deterioration was 3.6% for SRS and 11.2% for FSRT and for trigeminal nerve deterioration 6.0% for SRS and 8.4% for FSRT. Since these results were obtained from case series, a regular meta-analysis was not attempted.

Conclusion

SRS and FSRT are both noninvasive treatment alternatives for patients with VS with low rates of treatment failure in need of rescue therapy. In this selection of patients, the progression-free survival rates were on the order of 92-100% for both treatment options. There is a lack of high-quality studies comparing radiation therapy alternatives for patients with VS. Finally, 19 articles reported long-term tumor control after SRS, while only 2 articles reported long-term FSRT results, making effect estimates more uncertain for FSRT.

SUBMITTER: Persson O

PROVIDER: S-EPMC5425507 | biostudies-literature | 2017 Jun

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Stereotactic radiosurgery vs. fractionated radiotherapy for tumor control in vestibular schwannoma patients: a systematic review.

Persson Oscar O Bartek Jiri J Shalom Netanel Ben NB Wangerid Theresa T Jakola Asgeir Store AS Förander Petter P

Acta neurochirurgica 20170413 6

<h4>Objective</h4>Repeated controlled studies have revealed that stereotactic radiosurgery is better than microsurgery for patients with vestibular schwannoma (VS) <3 cm in need of intervention. In this systematic review we aimed to compare results from single-fraction stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) to fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (FSRT) for patients with VS.<h4>Data sources and eligibility criteria</h4>We systematically searched MEDLINE, Web of Science, Embase and Cochrane and screen ...[more]

PMID: 28409393

Similar Datasets

Project description:PurposeIn this benign tumor entity, preservation of cranial nerve function is of special importance. Due to its advantageous physical properties, proton beam radiotherapy (PRT) is a promising approach that spares healthy tissue. Could PRT go along with satisfactory preservation rates for cranial nerve function without compromising tumor control in patients with cranial nerve schwannoma unsuitable for stereotactic radiosurgery?MethodsWe analyzed 45 patients with cranial nerve schwannomas who underwent PRT between 2012 and 2020 at our institution. Response assessment was performed by MRI according to RECIST 1.1, and toxicity was graded following CTCAE 5.0.ResultsThe most common schwannoma origin was the vestibulocochlear nerve with 82.2%, followed by the trigeminal nerve with 8.9% and the glossopharyngeal nerve as well as the vagal nerve, both with each 4.4%. At radiotherapy start, 58% of cranial nerve schwannomas were progressive and 95.6% were symptomatic. Patients were treated with a median total dose of 54 Gy RBE in 1.8 Gy RBE per fraction. MRI during the median follow-up period of 42 months (IQR 26-61) revealed stable disease in 93.3% of the patients and partial regression in 6.7%. There was no case of progressive disease. New or worsening cranial nerve dysfunction was found in 20.0% of all patients, but always graded as CTCAE °I-II. In seven cases (16%), radiation-induced contrast enhancements (RICE) were detected after a median time of 14 months (range 2-26 months). RICE were asymptomatic (71%) or transient symptomatic (CTCAE °II; 29%). No CTCAE °III/IV toxicities were observed. Lesions regressed during the follow-up period in three of the seven cases, and no lesion progressed during the follow-up period.ConclusionThese data demonstrate excellent effectiveness with 100% local control in a median follow-up period of 3.6 years with a promising cranial nerve functional protection rate of 80%. RICE occurred in 16% of the patients after PRT and were not or only mildly symptomatic.

Project description:BackgroundThe management of vestibular schwannoma has evolved over the past hundred years. In the last decades, surgery has been gradually replaced by radiation therapy as a primary treatment modality, particularly for small tumors, due to the less invasive nature and the compared reported outcomes in tumor control and hearing preservation. However, irradiation sometimes fails to stop tumor growth. In a long-term follow-up after primary fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy, the rate of treatment failure was reported as 3% and needed surgical salvage. For single-fraction modality, Hasegawa et al. reported salvage treatment after primary Gamma Knife radiosurgery in 8%, where 90% of these underwent surgery and 50% of those who were treated with a second gamma knife surgery required surgical intervention later. An increase in tumor volume by more than 10-20%, tumor growth after three years, and no return to pretreatment volume after transient swelling have been considered as tumor recurrence rather than pseudoprogression, a transient increase in tumor volume after radiotherapy that occurs up to 30% of cases. It has been reported that microsurgery after radiotherapy is more difficult, with most authors reporting a loss of defined arachnoid planes and worse cranial nerve outcomes, especially for hearing and facial nerve function.Case descriptionA 43-year-old female patient was incidentally (asymptomatic) diagnosed on a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan harboring a left vestibular schwannoma, grade T2 (Hannover classification), in 2015. Neurologic examination was unremarkable, and audiometry testing was normal. She was initially treated with observation. Three years later, in 2018, the lesion had enlarged, becoming a grade T3a and reaching the cistern of the cerebellopontine angle. The tumor was then treated with fractionated stereotactic radiosurgery (5 sessions of 5 Gy). MRI scans in 2019 and 2020 showed slight tumor growth. This enlargement was attributed to a pseudoprogression after radiosurgery, and only observation was advocated. In 2022, 4 years later, after radiosurgery, the tumor was still growing, and the patient began to suffer from hearing loss. A failure treatment was considered, and microsurgery was indicated. The patient was counseled about the risk of functional nerve impairment, and surgical consent was obtained. A retro sigmoid approach was planned. A gross total resection was attempted due to the clear subperineural plane during tumor dissection and because it was the only option that would provide a cure for the patient. The adjacent neurovascular structures were firmly adhered to the tumor capsule, which represented a major challenge for microdissection. The tumor was soft, without significant bleeding. A total resection was achieved, and the facial nerve was anatomically preserved. The patient developed facial paresis (House-Brackmann III) in the immediate postoperative period, which improved at the 6-month follow-up. Hearing loss did not improve. Postoperative MRI showed total resection.ConclusionMicrosurgery after radiotherapy for vestibular schwannoma is challenging in terms of indication, when to indicate, resection target, difficulty in dissection due to local changes, and outcome. Gross total resection may be considered, as it is the only treatment that may provide a cure for the patient. However, the patient should be counseled about the risks.

Project description:BackgroundVestibular schwannomas are benign tumours for which various treatments are available. We performed a systematic review of prospective controlled trials comparing the patient-relevant benefits and harms of single-fraction stereotactic radiosurgery (sfSRS) with microsurgical resection (MR) in patients with vestibular schwannoma.MethodsWe searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and non-randomized prospective controlled trials in MEDLINE, Embase, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and study registries (last search: 09/2021) and also screened reference lists of relevant systematic reviews. Manufacturers were asked to provide unpublished data. Eligible studies investigated at least one patient-relevant outcome. We assessed the risk of bias (high or low) at the study and outcome level. If feasible, meta-analyses were performed. We graded the results into different categories (hint, indication, or proof of greater benefit or harm).ResultsWe identified three non-randomized prospective controlled trials of generally low quality with evaluable data on 339 patients with unilateral vestibular schwannoma. There was an indication of greater benefit of sfSRS compared with MR for facial palsy (OR 0.06, 95% CI 0.02-0.21, p < 0.001, 2 studies), hearing function (no pooled estimate available, 2 studies), and length of hospital stay (no pooled estimate available, 2 studies). We found no clinically relevant differences for mortality, vertigo, headaches, tinnitus, balance function, work disability, adverse events, and health-related quality of life.ConclusionsOur systematic review indicates that sfSRS has greater benefits than MR in patients with unilateral vestibular schwannoma. However, it is unclear whether this conclusion still holds after 2 years, as long-term studies are lacking. It is also unclear whether the effects of sfSRS are similar in patients with bilateral vestibular schwannomas. Long-term prospective studies including patients with this condition would therefore be useful.Systematic review registrationThe full (German language) protocol and report (Commission No. N20-03) are available on the institute's website: www.iqwig.de/en/projects/n20-03.html.

Dataset Information

Stereotactic radiosurgery vs. fractionated radiotherapy for tumor control in vestibular schwannoma patients: a systematic review.

Objective

Data sources and eligibility criteria

Intervention

Results

Conclusion

Publications

Stereotactic radiosurgery vs. fractionated radiotherapy for tumor control in vestibular schwannoma patients: a systematic review.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets