Dataset Information

Edema is not a reliable diagnostic sign to exclude small brain metastases.

ABSTRACT: No prior systematic study on the extent of vasogenic edema (VE) in patients with brain metastases (BM) exists. Here, we aim to determine 1) the general volumetric relationship between BM and VE, 2) a threshold diameter above which a BM shows VE, and 3) the influence of the primary tumor and location of the BM in order to improve diagnostic processes and understanding of edema formation. This single center, retrospective study includes 173 untreated patients with histologically proven BM. Semi-manual segmentation of 1416 BM on contrast-enhanced T1-weighted images and of 865 VE on fluid-attenuated inversion recovery/T2-weighted images was conducted. Statistical analyses were performed using a paired-samples t-test, linear regression/generalized mixed-effects model, and receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve controlling for the possible effect of non-uniformly distributed metastases among patients. For BM with non-confluent edema (n = 545), there was a statistically significant positive correlation between the volumes of the BM and the VE (P < 0.001). The optimal threshold for edema formation was a diameter of 9.4 mm for all BM. The primary tumors as interaction term in multivariate analysis had a significant influence on VE formation whereas location had not. Hence VE development is dependent on the volume of the underlying BM and the site of the primary neoplasm, but not from the location of the BM.

SUBMITTER: Schneider T

PROVIDER: S-EPMC5426632 | biostudies-literature | 2017

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Edema is not a reliable diagnostic sign to exclude small brain metastases.

Schneider Tanja T Kuhne Jan Felix JF Bittrich Paul P Schroeder Julian J Magnus Tim T Mohme Malte M Grosser Malte M Schoen Gerhard G Fiehler Jens J Siemonsen Susanne S

PloS one 20170511 5

No prior systematic study on the extent of vasogenic edema (VE) in patients with brain metastases (BM) exists. Here, we aim to determine 1) the general volumetric relationship between BM and VE, 2) a threshold diameter above which a BM shows VE, and 3) the influence of the primary tumor and location of the BM in order to improve diagnostic processes and understanding of edema formation. This single center, retrospective study includes 173 untreated patients with histologically proven BM. Semi-ma ...[more]

PMID: 28493907

Similar Datasets

Project description:Brain metastases (BM) have been closely associated with increased morbidity and poor survival outcomes in patients with non‑small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Excluding risk factors in histological subtypes, genomic alterations, including epidermal growth factor receptor mutations and anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) rearrangements have been also regarded as greater risk factors for BM in the aspect of molecular subtypes. In the present study, 69 tumor tissues and 51 peripheral blood samples from patients with NSCLC were analyzed using a hybridization capture‑based next‑generation sequencing (NGS) panel, including 95 known cancer genes. Among the 90 patients with stage IV NSCLC, 26 cases suffered from BM and 64 cases did not. In total, 174 somatic mutations in 35 mutated genes were identified, and 12 of these genes were concurrently present in the BM group and the non‑BM group. Importantly, five mutated genes including ALK, cytidine deaminase (CDA), SMAD family member 4 (SMAD4), superoxide dismutase 2 (SOD2) and Von Hippel‑Lindau tumor suppressor (VHL) genes were uniquely detected in the BM group, and they were enriched in the Hippo signaling pathway, pyrimidine metabolism and pantothenate and co‑enzyme A (CoA) biosynthesis, as demonstrated using Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes enrichment analysis. RNA polymerase II transcription regulator complex and promyelocytic leukemia nuclear body were the top functional categories according to the Gene Ontology enrichment analysis in the BM group and non‑BM group, respectively. Furthermore, 43.33% (13/30) of mutated genes were detected by both tumor tissue deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) and plasma‑derived circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) in the non‑BM group, while this percentage was only limited to 29.41% (5/17) in the BM group. To summarize, significant differences in somatic mutations, somatic interactions, key signaling pathways, functional biological information, and clinical actionability for the therapy of targeted agents were founded between the BM group and the non‑BM group, and ctDNA analysis may by applied as a more credible alternative for genomic profiling in patients with advanced NSCLC without BM, due to its higher consistency for genomic profiling between ctDNA analysis and tissue DNA analysis.

Project description:ImportanceThe proposed MOLEM (Management of Lesion to Exclude Melanoma) schema is more clinically relevant than Melanocytic Pathology Assessment Tool and Hierarchy for Diagnosis (MATH-Dx) for the management classification of melanocytic and nonmelanocytic lesions excised to exclude melanoma. A more standardized way of establishing diagnostic criteria will be crucial in the training of artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms.ObjectiveTo examine pathologists' variability, reliability, and confidence in reporting melanocytic and nonmelanocytic lesions excised to exclude melanoma using the MOLEM schema in a population of higher-risk patients.Design, setting, and participantsThis cohort study enrolled higher-risk patients referred to a primary care skin clinic in New South Wales, Australia, between April 2019 and December 2019. Baseline demographic characteristics including age, sex, and related clinical details (eg, history of melanoma) were collected. Patients with lesions suspicious for melanoma assessed by a primary care physician underwent clinical evaluation, dermoscopy imaging, and subsequent excision biopsy of the suspected lesion(s). A total of 217 lesions removed and prepared by conventional histologic method and stained with hematoxylin-eosin were reviewed by up to 9 independent pathologists for diagnosis using the MOLEM reporting schema. Pathologists evaluating for MOLEM schema were masked to the original histopathologic diagnosis.Main outcomes and measuresCharacteristics of the lesions were described and the concordance of cases per MOLEM class was assessed. Interrater agreement and the agreement between pathologists' ratings and the majority MOLEM diagnosis were calculated by Gwet AC1 with quadratic weighting applied. The diagnostic confidence of pathologists was then assessed.ResultsA total of 197 patients were included in the study (102 [51.8%] male; 95 [48.2%] female); mean (SD) age was 64.2 (15.8) years (range, 24-93 years). Overall, 217 index lesions were assessed with a total of 1516 histological diagnoses. Of 1516 diagnoses, 677 (44.7%) were classified as MOLEM class I; 120 (7.9%) as MOLEM class II; 564 (37.2%) as MOLEM class III; 114 (7.5%) as MOLEM class IV; and 55 (3.6%) as MOLEM class V. Concordance rates per MOLEM class were 88.6% (class I), 50.8% (class II), 76.2% (class III), 77.2% (class IV), and 74.2% (class V). The quadratic weighted interrater agreement was 91.3%, with a Gwet AC1 coefficient of 0.76 (95% CI, 0.72-0.81). The quadratic weighted agreement between pathologists' ratings and majority MOLEM was 94.7%, with a Gwet AC1 coefficient of 0.86 (95% CI, 0.84-0.88). The confidence in diagnosis data showed a relatively high level of confidence (between 1.0 and 1.5) when diagnosing classes I (mean [SD], 1.3 [0.3]), IV (1.3 [0.3]) and V (1.1 [0.1]); while classes II (1.8 [0.2]) and III (1.5 [0.4]) were diagnosed with a lower level of pathologist confidence (≥1.5). The quadratic weighted interrater confidence rating agreement was 95.2%, with a Gwet AC1 coefficient of 0.92 (95% CI, 0.90-0.94) for the 1314 confidence ratings collected. The confidence agreement for each MOLEM class was 95.0% (class I), 93.5% (class II), 95.3% (class III), 96.5% (class IV), and 97.5% (class V).Conclusions and relevanceThe proposed MOLEM schema better reflects clinical practice than the MPATH-Dx schema in lesions excised to exclude melanoma by combining diagnoses with similar prognostic outcomes for melanocytic and nonmelanocytic lesions into standardized classification categories. Pathologists' level of confidence appeared to follow the MOLEM schema diagnostic concordance trend, ie, atypical naevi and melanoma in situ diagnoses were the least agreed upon and the most challenging for pathologists to confidently diagnose.

Dataset Information

Edema is not a reliable diagnostic sign to exclude small brain metastases.

Publications

Edema is not a reliable diagnostic sign to exclude small brain metastases.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets