Dataset Information

Nitric Oxide (NO) Mediates the Inhibition of Form-Deprivation Myopia by Atropine in Chicks.

ABSTRACT: Myopia is the most common childhood refractive disorder. Atropine inhibits myopia progression, but its mechanism is unknown. Here, we show that myopia-prevention by atropine requires production of nitric oxide (NO). Form-deprivation myopia (FDM) was induced in week-old chicks by diffusers over the right eye (OD); the left eye (OS) remained ungoggled. On post-goggling days 1, 3, and 5, OD received intravitreally 20?µL of phosphate-buffered saline (vehicle), or vehicle plus: NO source: L-arginine (L-Arg, 60-6,000?nmol) or sodium nitroprusside (SNP, 10-1,000?nmol); atropine (240?nmol); NO inhibitors: L-NIO or L-NMMA (6?nmol); negative controls: D-Arg (10?µmol) or D-NMMA (6?nmol); or atropine plus L-NIO, L-NMMA, or D-NMMA; OS received vehicle. On day 6 post-goggling, refractive error, axial length, equatorial diameter, and wet weight were measured. Vehicle-injected goggled eyes developed significant FDM. This was inhibited by L-Arg (ED50?=?400?nmol) or SNP (ED50?=?20?nmol), but not D-Arg. Higher-dose SNP, but not L-Arg, was toxic to retina/RPE. Atropine inhibited FDM as expected; adding NOS-inhibitors (L-NIO, L-NMMA) to atropine inhibited this effect dose-dependently, but adding D-NMMA did not. Equatorial diameter, wet weight, and metrics of control eyes were not affected by any treatment. In summary, intraocular NO inhibits myopia dose-dependently and is obligatory for inhibition of myopia by atropine.

SUBMITTER: Carr BJ

PROVIDER: S-EPMC5431363 | biostudies-literature | 2016 Dec

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Nitric Oxide (NO) Mediates the Inhibition of Form-Deprivation Myopia by Atropine in Chicks.

Carr Brittany J BJ Stell William K WK

Scientific reports 20161205 1

Myopia is the most common childhood refractive disorder. Atropine inhibits myopia progression, but its mechanism is unknown. Here, we show that myopia-prevention by atropine requires production of nitric oxide (NO). Form-deprivation myopia (FDM) was induced in week-old chicks by diffusers over the right eye (OD); the left eye (OS) remained ungoggled. On post-goggling days 1, 3, and 5, OD received intravitreally 20 µL of phosphate-buffered saline (vehicle), or vehicle plus: NO source: L-arginine ...[more]

PMID: 28442706

Similar Datasets

Project description:Juvenile primates develop myopia when their visual experience is degraded by lid fusion. In response to the abnormal visual input, retinal neural networks cause an excessive growth of the postequatorial segment of the eye, but the mechanism underlying this axial elongation is unknown. By combining analysis of gene expression, injection of the thymidine analog 5-bromo-2'-deoxyuridine and immunocytochemistry, we show that the retinal periphery in both juvenile rhesus macaques and green monkeys harbors a population of mitotically active neuroprogenitor cells that proliferate when the visual experience is altered by lid fusion. Furthermore, the number of dividing cells is highly correlated with the axial elongation of the eye and the resulting myopic refractive error. Thus, the retina undergoes active growth during the postnatal development of the primate eye. This growth is modulated by the visual input and accelerates considerably when the eye develops axial myopia. cDNA subtractions, construction of cDNA libraries and differential screening were performed as previously described (Tkatchenko et al, 2000). Two subtractions were carried out resulting in two cDNA libraries. One library was enriched in clones potentially up-regulated in the retina of the closed eye and the other was enriched in cDNAs potentially down-regulated. One thousand clones from each library were analyzed, and 535 differentially-expressed cDNAs were amplified by PCR and spotted onto glass slides coated with poly-L-lysine (five duplicates for each cDNA). The slides were then processed, hybridized with Cy3- and Cy5-labeled complex cDNA probes and washed in 0.2xSSC as described at http://cmgm.stanford.edu/pbrown/protocols/. Two hybridizations with color swap were carried for each monkey. After hybridization, slides were scanned using a GenePix 4000B microarray scanner (Axon Instruments, Union City, CA). The images were acquired and processed using the GenePix Pro 5.1 software package (Axon Instruments). The data obtained were normalized against GAPDH expression level and mean values (the reported values) and P-values (probability associated with a Student's t-test) were calculated for duplicate experiments (n = 10) with color swap using Microsoft Excel. Genes were defined as differentially regulated if P< 0.05. Cluster analysis was performed using the Genesis software package (provided by Alexander Sturn, Graz University of Technology, Austria).

Project description:BackgroundThe use of ocular hypotensive drugs has been reported to attenuate myopia progression. This study explores whether brimonidine can slow myopia progression in the guinea pig form-deprivation (FD) model.MethodsThree-week-old pigmented male guinea pigs (Cavia porcellus) underwent monocular FD and were treated with 3 different methods of brimonidine administration (eye drops, subconjunctival or intravitreal injections). Four different concentrations of brimonidine were tested for intravitreal injection (2 μg/μL, 4 μg/μL, 20 μg/μL, 40 μg/μL). All treatments continued for a period of 21 days. Tonometry, retinoscopy, and A-scan ultrasonography were used to monitor intraocular pressure (IOP), refractive error and axial length (AL), respectively. On day 21, guinea pigs were sacrificed for RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) to screen for associated transcriptomic changes.ResultsThe myopia model was successfully established in FD animals (control eye vs. FD eye, respectively: refraction at day 20, 0.97 ± 0.18 D vs. - 0.13 ± 0.38 D, F = 6.921, P = 0.02; AL difference between day 0 and day 21, 0.29 ± 0.04 mm vs. 0.45 ± 0.03 mm, F = 11.655, P = 0.004). Among the 3 different brimonidine administration methods, intravitreal injection was the most effective in slowing myopia progression, and 4 μg/μL was the most effective among the four different concentrations of brimonidine intravitreal injection tested. The AL and the refraction of the brimonidine intravitreal injection group was significantly shorter or more hyperopic than those of other 2 groups. Four μg/μL produced the smallest difference in AL and spherical equivalent difference values. FD treatment significantly increased the IOP. IOP was significantly lower at 1 day after intravitreal injections which was the lowest in FD eye of intravitreal injection of brimonidine. At day 21, gene expression analyses using RNA-seq showed upregulation of Col1a1 and Mmp2 expression levels by intravitreal brimonidine.ConclusionsAmong the 3 different administration methods, intravitreal injection of brimonidine was the most effective in slowing myopia progression in the FD guinea pig model. Intravitreal brimonidine at 4 μg/μL significantly reduced the development of FD myopia in guinea pigs. Expression levels of the Col1a1 and Mmp2 genes were significantly increased in the retinal tissues of the FD-Inj-Br group.

Project description:BACKGROUND:The putative myopia-controlling receptor is thought to be muscarinic acetylcholine receptor subtype M4 , because mamba toxin-3 can inhibit form-deprivation myopia in chicks at a far lower concentration than atropine. However, mamba toxin-3 is equally potent at the human α1A -, α1D -, and α2A -adrenoceptors. To test the hypothesis that α-adrenoceptors might be involved in regulation of eye growth, the treatment effects of α2 -adrenoceptor agonists brimonidine, clonidine, and guanfacine, and antagonist yohimbine, on form-deprivation myopia in the chick were measured. METHODS:Right eyes of White Leghorn chicks were goggled with diffusers to induce form-deprivation myopia; left eyes were left open as controls. Goggled eyes were injected intravitreally with 20 μL of vehicle, or 2, 20, or 200 nmol of brimonidine, clonidine, guanfacine, or yohimbine, 24, 72, and 120 hours after goggle application. Alternatively, myopia was inhibited physiologically by goggle removal for two hours, and the α2 -adrenoceptor antagonist, yohimbine, was injected to test whether it could block this type of myopia inhibition. One day after the last injection, refractive error and axial length were measured. RESULTS:Brimonidine (20 and 200 nmol) and clonidine (200 nmol) effectively inhibited experimentally induced increases in negative refractive error and axial elongation. All doses of guanfacine significantly inhibited induced negative refractive error, but only 20 and 200 nmol significantly inhibited axial elongation. Yohimbine had no effect on form-deprivation myopia, but 200 nmol reduced the myopia-inhibiting effect of goggle removal. CONCLUSION:High concentrations of α2 -adrenoceptor agonists, similar to those required by atropine, inhibited chick form-deprivation myopia; antagonism by yohimbine had no effect. High-concentration yohimbine partially interfered with emmetropisation in form-deprived chicks experiencing normal vision for two hours per day. These data support the hypothesis that treatment with high concentrations of adrenergic drugs can affect experimentally induced myopia and normal visual processes.

Dataset Information

Nitric Oxide (NO) Mediates the Inhibition of Form-Deprivation Myopia by Atropine in Chicks.

Publications

Nitric Oxide (NO) Mediates the Inhibition of Form-Deprivation Myopia by Atropine in Chicks.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure