Dataset Information

Affective responses in mountain hiking-A randomized crossover trial focusing on differences between indoor and outdoor activity.

ABSTRACT: INTRODUCTION:Affective responses during physical activity (PA) are important for engagement in PA programs and for adherence to a physically active lifestyle. Little is known about the affective responses to PA bouts lasting longer than 45 minutes. Therefore, the aims of the present study were to analyse acute effects on affective responses of a three-hour outdoor PA intervention (mountain hiking) compared to a sedentary control situation and to an indoor treadmill condition. METHODS:Using a randomized crossover design, 42 healthy participants were randomly exposed to three different conditions: outdoor mountain hiking, indoor treadmill walking, and sedentary control situation (approximately three hours each). Measures included the Feeling Scale, Felt Arousal Scale and a Mood Survey Scale. Repeated measures ANOVAs were used to analyse differences between the conditions. RESULTS:Compared to the control situation, the participants showed a significant increase in affective valence (d = 1.21, p < .001), activation (d = 0.81, p = .004), elation (d = 1.07, p < .001), and calmness (d = 0.84, p = .004), and a significant decrease in fatigue (d = -1.19, p < .001) and anxiety (d = -.79, p < .001) after mountain hiking. Outdoor mountain hiking showed significantly greater positive effects on affective valence, activation, and fatigue compared to indoor treadmill walking. DISCUSSION:The results indicate that a three-hour PA intervention (mountain hiking) elicits higher positive and lower negative affective responses compared to a sedentary control situation and to an indoor PA condition. Outdoor mountain hiking can be recommended by health professionals as a form of PA with the potential to positively influence affective responses. TRIAL REGISTRATION:ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02853760. https://clinicaltrials.gov/. Date of registration: 08/02/2016 (retrospectively registered). Date of enrolment of the first participant to the trial: 05/01/2014.

SUBMITTER: Niedermeier M

PROVIDER: S-EPMC5433751 | biostudies-literature | 2017

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Affective responses in mountain hiking-A randomized crossover trial focusing on differences between indoor and outdoor activity.

Niedermeier Martin M Einwanger Jürgen J Hartl Arnulf A Kopp Martin M

PloS one 20170516 5

<h4>Introduction</h4>Affective responses during physical activity (PA) are important for engagement in PA programs and for adherence to a physically active lifestyle. Little is known about the affective responses to PA bouts lasting longer than 45 minutes. Therefore, the aims of the present study were to analyse acute effects on affective responses of a three-hour outdoor PA intervention (mountain hiking) compared to a sedentary control situation and to an indoor treadmill condition.<h4>Methods< ...[more]

PMID: 28520774

Similar Datasets

Project description:BACKGROUND:Indoor exposure to fine particulate matter (PM2.5) from outdoor sources is a major health concern, especially in highly polluted developing countries such as China. Few studies have evaluated the effectiveness of indoor air purification on the improvement of cardiopulmonary health in these areas. OBJECTIVES:This study sought to evaluate whether a short-term indoor air purifier intervention improves cardiopulmonary health. METHODS:We conducted a randomized, double-blind crossover trial among 35 healthy college students in Shanghai, China, in 2014. These students lived in dormitories that were randomized into 2 groups and alternated the use of true or sham air purifiers for 48 h with a 2-week washout interval. We measured 14 circulating biomarkers of inflammation, coagulation, and vasoconstriction; lung function; blood pressure (BP); and fractional exhaled nitric. We applied linear mixed-effect models to evaluate the effect of the intervention on health outcome variables. RESULTS:On average, air purification resulted in a 57% reduction in PM2.5 concentration, from 96.2 to 41.3 ?g/m3, within hours of operation. Air purification was significantly associated with decreases in geometric means of several circulating inflammatory and thrombogenic biomarkers, including 17.5% in monocyte chemoattractant protein-1, 68.1% in interleukin-1?, 32.8% in myeloperoxidase, and 64.9% in soluble CD40 ligand. Furthermore, systolic BP, diastolic BP, and fractional exhaled nitrous oxide were significantly decreased by 2.7%, 4.8%, and 17.0% in geometric mean, respectively. The impacts on lung function and vasoconstriction biomarkers were beneficial but not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS:This intervention study demonstrated clear cardiopulmonary benefits of indoor air purification among young, healthy adults in a Chinese city with severe ambient particulate air pollution. (Intervention Study on the Health Impact of Air Filters in Chinese Adults; NCT02239744).

Project description:BackgroundVentilation has emerged as an important strategy to reduce indoor aerosol transmission of coronavirus disease 2019. Indoor air carbon dioxide (CO2) concentrations are a surrogate measure of respiratory pathogen transmission risk.ObjectivesTo determine whether CO2 monitors are necessary and effective to improve ventilation in hospitals.MethodsA randomized, placebo (sham)-controlled, crossover, open label trial. Between February and May 2021, we placed CO2 monitors in twelve double-bed patient rooms across two geriatric wards. Staff were instructed to open windows, increase the air exchange rate and reduce room crowding to maintain indoor air CO2 concentrations ≤800 parts per million (ppm).ResultsCO2 levels increased during morning care and especially in rooms housing couples (rooming-in). The median (interquartile range, IQR) time/day with CO2 concentration > 800 ppm (primary outcome) was 110 min (IQR 47-207) at baseline, 82 min (IQR 12-226.5) during sham periods, 78 min (IQR 20-154) during intervention periods and 140 min (IQR 19.5-612.5) post-intervention. The intervention period only differed significantly from the post-intervention period (P = 0.02), mainly due to an imbalance in rooming-in. Significant but small differences were observed in secondary outcomes of time/day with CO2 concentrations > 1000 ppm and daily peak CO2 concentrations during the intervention vs. baseline and vs. the post-intervention period, but not vs. sham. Staff reported cold discomfort for patients as the main barrier towards increasing ventilation.DiscussionIndoor air CO2 concentrations in hospital rooms commonly peaked above recommended levels, especially during morning care and rooming-in. There are many possible barriers towards implementing CO2 monitors to improve ventilation in a real-world hospital setting. A paradigm shift in hospital infection control towards adequate ventilation is warranted.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04770597.

Dataset Information

Affective responses in mountain hiking-A randomized crossover trial focusing on differences between indoor and outdoor activity.

Publications

Affective responses in mountain hiking-A randomized crossover trial focusing on differences between indoor and outdoor activity.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets