Dataset Information

Association Between Hospital Case Volume of Sepsis, Adherence to Evidence-Based Processes of Care and Patient Outcomes.

ABSTRACT: We sought to explore potential mechanisms underlying hospital sepsis case volume-mortality associations by investigating implementation of evidence-based processes of care.Retrospective cohort study. We determined associations of sepsis case volume with three evidence-based processes of care (lactate measurement during first hospital day, norepinephrine as first vasopressor, and avoidance of starch-based colloids) and assessed their role in mediation of case volume-mortality associations.Enhanced administrative data (Premier, Charlotte, NC) from 534 U.S. hospitals.A total of 287,914 adult patients with sepsis present at admission between July 2010 and December 2012 of whom 58,045 received a vasopressor for septic shock during the first 2 days of hospitalization.None.Among patients with sepsis, 1.9% received starch, and among patients with septic shock, 68.3% had lactate measured and 64% received norepinephrine as initial vasopressor. Patients at hospitals with the highest case volume were more likely to have lactate measured (adjusted odds ratio quartile 4 vs quartile 1, 2.8; 95% CI, 2.1-3.7) and receive norepinephrine as initial vasopressor (adjusted odds ratio quartile 4 vs quartile 1, 2.1; 95% CI, 1.6-2.7). Case volume was not associated with avoidance of starch products (adjusted odds ratio quartile 4 vs quartile 1, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.45-1.2). Adherence to evidence-based care was associated with lower hospital mortality (adjusted odds ratio, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.70-0.94) but did not strongly mediate case volume-mortality associations (point estimate change ? 2%).In a large cohort of U.S. patients with sepsis, select evidence-based processes of care were more likely implemented at high-volume hospitals but did not strongly mediate case volume-mortality associations. Considering processes and case volume when regionalizing sepsis care may maximize patient outcomes.

SUBMITTER: Fawzy A

PROVIDER: S-EPMC5433897 | biostudies-literature | 2017 Jun

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Association Between Hospital Case Volume of Sepsis, Adherence to Evidence-Based Processes of Care and Patient Outcomes.

Fawzy Ashraf A Walkey Allan J AJ

Critical care medicine 20170601 6

<h4>Objectives</h4>We sought to explore potential mechanisms underlying hospital sepsis case volume-mortality associations by investigating implementation of evidence-based processes of care.<h4>Design</h4>Retrospective cohort study. We determined associations of sepsis case volume with three evidence-based processes of care (lactate measurement during first hospital day, norepinephrine as first vasopressor, and avoidance of starch-based colloids) and assessed their role in mediation of case vol ...[more]

PMID: 28350646

Similar Datasets

Project description:The global incidence of sepsis is increasing, and mortality remains high. The mortality is even higher in resource-poor countries where facilities and equipment are limited. The Surviving Sepsis Campaign (SSC) recommends an updated hour-1 bundle based on the evidence from the International Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock 2018. To reduce mortality from sepsis, compliance with the "bundle" is essential. Data from developing countries like Sri Lanka on the management of sepsis according to the SSC guidelines are not available. Hence, this study looks at the patient characteristics and management of septic patients at a tertiary care hospital in Sri Lanka. Patients admitted to the University Medical Unit of Colombo South Teaching Hospital from January to August 2019 fulfilling the inclusion criteria were included. The hour-1 sepsis bundle adherence, demographic data, and management were recorded. There were 387 patients: 163 males and 224 females. The age range was 15-95 with a mean age of 63. 83.7% were direct admissions while 16.3% were transfers from a peripheral hospital. The most common source of infection was urine (82 (21.2%)) followed by blood stream (105 (27.1%)) and skin and soft tissue (114 (29.5%)). One-hour SSC bundle compliance is as follows: administration of intravenous fluids: 42 (10.9%), blood cultures before antibiotics: 225 (58.1%), first dose antibiotic: 15 (3.9%), and arterial blood gas: 60 (15.5%). Staffing capacity did not make a difference to adherence to the bundle. The study mortality rate was 37 (9.6%). Binary logistic regression indicates that quick sequential organ failure assessment (qSOFA) score is a significant predictor of mortality (chi-square = 35.08, df = 3, and p = 0.001 (<0.05)) with an odds ratio (OR) of 7.529 (95% CI 3.597-14.323). The other predictors, age, sex, adherence to sepsis care bundle, and comorbidities, were not significant. In conclusion, mortality of sepsis is high and adherence to sepsis care bundle is poor in Sri Lanka even at a tertiary care hospital. Education and training of staff are needed to boost adherence. This will in turn improve quality of care and outcomes of septic patients in resource-poor countries.

Project description:RationaleImmunosuppressive medical conditions are risk factors for mortality from severe infections. It is unknown whether hospital characteristics affect this risk.ObjectivesTo determine whether the odds of death for an immunosuppressed patient with sepsis relative to a nonimmunosuppressed patient with sepsis varies according to the hospital's yearly case volume of immunosuppressed patients with sepsis.MethodsPatients with sepsis at hospitals in the Vizient database were characterized as immunosuppressed or not immunosuppressed on the basis of diagnosis codes and medication use. Hospitals were grouped into quartiles based on their average volumes of immunosuppressed patients with sepsis per year. Multilevel logistic regression with clustering of patients by hospital was used to determine whether the odds of in-hospital death from sepsis owing to a suppressed immune state varied by hospital quartile.ResultsThere were 350,183 patients with sepsis at 60 hospitals in the Vizient database from 2010 to 2012. Immunosuppressed patients with sepsis at the 15 hospitals in the lowest quartile (64 to 224 immunosuppressed patients with sepsis per year) had an increased odds of in-hospital death relative to nonimmunosuppressed patients with sepsis at these hospitals (adjusted odds ratio, 1.38; 95% confidence interval, 1.27-1.50; P < 0.001). The odds of in-hospital death for immunosuppressed patients with sepsis relative to nonimmunosuppressed patients with sepsis was similar for patients at hospitals in the second, third, and fourth quartiles (225 to 1,056 immunosuppressed patients with sepsis per year). The adjusted odds of death from sepsis owing to a suppressed immune state of 1.21 (95% confidence interval, 1.18-1.25; P < 0.001) for patients at these 45 hospitals was significantly less than for patients at the 15 hospitals in the lowest quartile (P = 0.004 for difference).ConclusionsThe risk of death from sepsis owing to a suppressed immune state was greatest at hospitals with the lowest volume of immunosuppressed patients with sepsis. Further study is needed to determine whether this finding is related to differences in patient characteristics or in care delivery at hospitals with different amounts of exposure to immunosuppressed patients.

Project description:ObjectivesCase volume-outcome associations bolster arguments to regionalize severe sepsis care, an approach that may necessitate interhospital patient transfers. Although transferred patients may most closely reflect care processes involved with regionalization, associations between sepsis case volume and outcomes among transferred patients are unclear. We investigated case volume-outcome associations among patients with severe sepsis transferred from another hospital.DesignSerial cross-sectional study using the Nationwide Inpatient Sample.SettingUnited States nonfederal hospitals, years 2003-2011.PatientsOne hundred forty-one thousand seven hundred seven patients (weighted national estimate of 717,732) with severe sepsis transferred from another acute care hospital.InterventionsNone.Measurements and main resultsWe examined associations between quintiles of annual hospital severe sepsis case volume for the receiving hospital and in-hospital mortality among transferred patients with severe sepsis. Secondary outcomes included hospital length of stay and total charges. Transferred patients accounted for 13.2% of hospitalized severe sepsis cases. In-hospital mortality was 33.2%, with median length of stay 11 days (interquartile range, 5-22), and median total charge $70,722 (interquartile range, $30,591-$159,013). Patients transferred to highest volume hospitals had higher predicted mortality risk, greater number of acutely dysfunctional organs, and lower adjusted in-hospital mortality when compared with the lowest-volume hospitals (odds ratio, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.67-0.90). In stratified analysis (p < 0.001 for interaction of case volume by organ failure), mortality benefit associated with case volume was limited to patients with single organ dysfunction (n = 48,607, 34.3% of transfers) (odds ratio, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.55-0.80). Treatment at highest volume hospitals was significantly associated with shorter adjusted length of stay (incidence rate ratio, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.75-0.98) but not costs (% charge difference, 95% CI: [-]18.8, [-]37.9 to [+]0.3).ConclusionsHospital mortality was lowest among patients with severe sepsis who were transferred to high-volume hospitals; however, case volume benefits for transferred patients may be limited to patients with lower illness severity.

Project description:Rationale: Postsepsis care recommendations target specific deficits experienced by sepsis survivors in elements such as optimization of medications, screening for functional impairments, monitoring for common and preventable causes of health deterioration, and consideration of palliative care. However, few data are available regarding the application of these elements in clinical practice.Objectives: To quantify the delivery of postsepsis care for patients discharged after hospital admission for sepsis and evaluate the association between receipt of postsepsis care elements and reduced mortality and hospital readmission within 90 days.Methods: We conducted a retrospective chart review of a random sample of patients who were discharged alive after an admission for sepsis (identified from International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision discharge codes) at 10 hospitals during 2017. We used a structured chart abstraction to determine whether four elements of postsepsis care were provided within 90 days of hospital discharge, per expert recommendations. We used multivariable logistic regression to evaluate the association between receipt of care elements and 90-day hospital readmission and mortality, adjusted for age, comorbidity, length of stay, and discharge disposition.Results: Among 189 sepsis survivors, 117 (62%) had medications optimized, 123 (65%) had screening for functional or mental health impairments, 86 (46%) were monitored for common and preventable causes of health deterioration, and 110 (58%) had care alignment processes documented (i.e., assessed for palliative care or goals of care). Only 20 (11%) received all four care elements within 90 days. Within 90 days of discharge, 66 (35%) patients were readmitted and 33 (17%) died (total patients readmitted or died, n = 82). Receipt of two (odds ratio [OR], 0.26; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 0.10-0.69) or more (three OR, 0.28; 95% CI, 0.11-0.72; four OR, 0.12; 95% CI, 0.03-0.50) care elements was associated with lower odds of 90-day readmission or 90-day mortality compared with zero or one element documented. Optimization of medications (no medication errors vs. one or more errors; OR, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.21-0.92), documented functional or mental health assessments (physical function plus swallowing/mental health assessments vs. no assessments; OR, 0.14; 95% CI, 0.05-0.40), and documented goals of care or palliative care screening (OR, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.25-1.05; not statistically significant) were associated with lower odds of 90-day readmission or 90-day mortality.Conclusions: In this retrospective cohort study of data from a single health system, we found variable delivery of recommended postsepsis care elements that were associated with reduced morbidity and mortality after hospitalization for sepsis. Implementation strategies to efficiently overcome barriers to adopting recommended postsepsis care may help improve outcomes for sepsis survivors.

Project description:OBJECTIVES:Prior studies investigating hospital mechanical ventilation volume-outcome associations have had conflicting findings. Volume-outcome relationships within contemporary mechanical ventilation practices are unclear. We sought to determine associations between hospital mechanical ventilation volume and patient outcomes. DESIGN:Retrospective cohort study. SETTING:The California Patient Discharge Database 2016. PATIENTS:Adult nonsurgical patients receiving mechanical ventilation. INTERVENTIONS:The primary outcome was hospital death with secondary outcomes of tracheostomy and 30-day readmission. We used multivariable generalized estimating equations to determine the association between patient outcomes and hospital mechanical ventilation volume quartile. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS:We identified 51,689 patients across 274 hospitals who required mechanical ventilation in California in 2016. 38.2% of patients died in the hospital with 4.4% receiving a tracheostomy. Among survivors, 29.5% required readmission within 30 days of discharge. Patients admitted to high versus low volume hospitals had higher odds of death (quartile 4 vs quartile 1 adjusted odds ratio, 1.40; 95% CI, 1.17-1.68) and tracheostomy (quartile 4 vs quartile 1 adjusted odds ratio, 1.58; 95% CI, 1.21-2.06). However, odds of 30-day readmission among survivors was lower at high versus low volume hospitals (quartile 4 vs quartile 1 adjusted odds ratio, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.67-0.89). Higher hospital mechanical ventilation volume was weakly correlated with higher hospital risk-adjusted mortality rates (? = 0.16; p = 0.008). These moderately strong observations were supported by multiple sensitivity analyses. CONCLUSIONS:Contrary to previous studies, we observed worse patient outcomes at higher mechanical ventilation volume hospitals. In the setting of increasing use of mechanical ventilation and changes in mechanical ventilation practices, multiple mechanisms of worse outcomes including resource strain are possible. Future studies investigating differences in processes of care between high and low volume hospitals are necessary.

Dataset Information

Association Between Hospital Case Volume of Sepsis, Adherence to Evidence-Based Processes of Care and Patient Outcomes.

Publications

Association Between Hospital Case Volume of Sepsis, Adherence to Evidence-Based Processes of Care and Patient Outcomes.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets