Dataset Information

Comparison of IVA and GIG-ICA in Brain Functional Network Estimation Using fMRI Data.

ABSTRACT: Spatial group independent component analysis (GICA) methods decompose multiple-subject functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data into a linear mixture of spatially independent components (ICs), some of which are subsequently characterized as brain functional networks. Group information guided independent component analysis (GIG-ICA) as a variant of GICA has been proposed to improve the accuracy of the subject-specific ICs estimation by optimizing their independence. Independent vector analysis (IVA) is another method which optimizes the independence among each subject's components and the dependence among corresponding components of different subjects. Both methods are promising in neuroimaging study and showed a better performance than the traditional GICA. However, the difference between IVA and GIG-ICA has not been well studied. A detailed comparison between them is demanded to provide guidance for functional network analyses. In this work, we employed multiple simulations to evaluate the performances of the two approaches in estimating subject-specific components and time courses under conditions of different data quality and quantity, varied number of sources generated and inaccurate number of components used in computation, as well as the presence of spatially subject-unique sources. We also compared the two methods using healthy subjects' test-retest resting-state fMRI data in terms of spatial functional networks and functional network connectivity (FNC). Results from simulations support that GIG-ICA showed better recovery accuracy of both components and time courses than IVA for those subject-common sources, and IVA outperformed GIG-ICA in component and time course estimation for the subject-unique sources. Results from real fMRI data suggest that GIG-ICA resulted in more reliable spatial functional networks and yielded higher and more robust modularity property of FNC, compared to IVA. Taken together, GIG-ICA is appropriate for estimating networks which are consistent across subjects, while IVA is able to estimate networks with great inter-subject variability or subject-unique property.

SUBMITTER: Du Y

PROVIDER: S-EPMC5437155 | biostudies-literature | 2017

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Comparison of IVA and GIG-ICA in Brain Functional Network Estimation Using fMRI Data.

Du Yuhui Y Lin Dongdong D Yu Qingbao Q Sui Jing J Chen Jiayu J Rachakonda Srinivas S Adali Tulay T Calhoun Vince D VD

Frontiers in neuroscience 20170519

Spatial group independent component analysis (GICA) methods decompose multiple-subject functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data into a linear mixture of spatially independent components (ICs), some of which are subsequently characterized as brain functional networks. Group information guided independent component analysis (GIG-ICA) as a variant of GICA has been proposed to improve the accuracy of the subject-specific ICs estimation by optimizing their independence. Independent vector an ...[more]

PMID: 28579940

Similar Datasets

Project description:Multimodal neuroimaging research plays a pivotal role in understanding the complexities of the human brain and its disorders. Independent component analysis (ICA) has emerged as a widely used and powerful tool for disentangling mixed independent sources, particularly in the analysis of functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data. This paper extends the use of ICA as a unifying framework for multimodal fusion, introducing a novel approach termed parallel multilink group joint ICA (pmg-jICA). The method allows for the fusion of gray matter maps from structural MRI (sMRI) data to multiple fMRI intrinsic networks, addressing the limitations of previous models. The effectiveness of pmg-jICA is demonstrated through its application to an Alzheimer's dataset, yielding linked structure-function outputs for 53 brain networks. Our approach leverages the complementary information from various imaging modalities, providing a unique perspective on brain alterations in Alzheimer's disease. The pmg-jICA identifies several components with significant differences between HC and AD groups including thalamus, caudate, putamen with in the subcortical (SC) domain, insula, parahippocampal gyrus within the cognitive control (CC) domain, and the lingual gyrus within the visual (VS) domain, providing localized insights into the links between AD and specific brain regions. In addition, because we link across multiple brain networks, we can also compute functional network connectivity (FNC) from spatial maps and subject loadings, providing a detailed exploration of the relationships between different brain regions and allowing us to visualize spatial patterns and loading parameters in sMRI along with intrinsic networks and FNC from the fMRI data. In essence, developed approach combines concepts from joint ICA and group ICA to provide a rich set of output characterizing data-driven links between covarying gray matter networks, and a (potentially large number of) resting fMRI networks allowing further study in the context of structure/function links. We demonstrate the utility of the approach by highlighting key structure/function disruptions in Alzheimer's individuals.

Dataset Information

Comparison of IVA and GIG-ICA in Brain Functional Network Estimation Using fMRI Data.

Publications

Comparison of IVA and GIG-ICA in Brain Functional Network Estimation Using fMRI Data.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets