Dataset Information

Moderators of Parent Training for Disruptive Behaviors in Young Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder.

ABSTRACT: We conducted a 6 month, randomized trial of parent training (PT) versus a parent education program (PEP) in 180 young children (158 boys, 22 girls), ages 3-7 years, with autism spectrum disorder (ASD). PT was superior to PEP in decreasing disruptive and noncompliant behaviors. In the current study, we assess moderators of treatment response in this trial. Thirteen clinical and demographic variables were evaluated as potential moderators of three outcome variables: the Aberrant Behavior Checklist-Irritability subscale (ABC-I), Home Situations Questionnaire (HSQ), and Clinical Global Impressions-Improvement Scale (CGI-I). We used an intent-to-treat model and random effects regression. Neither IQ nor ASD severity moderated outcome on the selected outcome measures. Severity of Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) and anxiety moderated outcomes on the ABC-I and HSQ. For instance, there was a 6.6 point difference on the ABC-I between high and low ADHD groups (p?=?.05) and a 5.3 point difference between high and low Anxiety groups (p?=?.04). Oppositional defiant disorder symptoms and household income moderated outcomes on the HSQ. None of the baseline variables moderated outcome on the CGI-I. That IQ and ASD symptom severity did not moderate outcome suggests that PT is likely to benefit a wide range of children with ASD and disruptive behavior.

SUBMITTER: Lecavalier L

PROVIDER: S-EPMC5459681 | biostudies-literature | 2017 Aug

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Moderators of Parent Training for Disruptive Behaviors in Young Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder.

Lecavalier Luc L Smith Tristram T Johnson Cynthia C Bearss Karen K Swiezy Naomi N Aman Michael G MG Sukhodolsky Denis G DG Deng Yanhong Y Dziura James J Scahill Lawrence L

Journal of abnormal child psychology 20170801 6

We conducted a 6 month, randomized trial of parent training (PT) versus a parent education program (PEP) in 180 young children (158 boys, 22 girls), ages 3-7 years, with autism spectrum disorder (ASD). PT was superior to PEP in decreasing disruptive and noncompliant behaviors. In the current study, we assess moderators of treatment response in this trial. Thirteen clinical and demographic variables were evaluated as potential moderators of three outcome variables: the Aberrant Behavior Checklist ...[more]

PMID: 27917460

Similar Datasets

Project description:BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE:Sleep disturbances in autism spectrum disorder (ASD) are common and may impair daytime functioning as well as add to parental burden. In this well characterized sample of young children with ASD and disruptive behaviors, we examine the association of age and IQ in sleep disturbances using the Child Sleep Habits Questionnaire modified for ASD (CSHQ-ASD). We also test whether children with poor sleep have greater daytime behavioral problems than those with better sleep. Finally, we examine whether parental stress is higher in children with greater disruptive behaviors and sleep disturbances. PARTICIPANTS AND METHODS:One hundred and seventy-seven children with complete data out of 180 (mean age 4.7) with ASD participated in a randomized clinical trial. Parents completed the CSHQ-ASD and several other measures at study enrollment. The sample was divided into "poor sleepers" (upper quartile on the total score of the CSHQ-ASD) and "good sleepers" (lower quartile) for comparisons. Analyses were conducted to evaluate group differences on age, IQ, daytime disruptive behavior, social disability and parental stress. RESULTS:The two groups of young children with ASD, good sleepers versus poor sleepers, were not different on age or cognitive level. Children in the poor sleeping group had significantly higher daytime behavioral problems including irritability, hyperactivity, social withdrawal and stereotypical behaviors. Parents in this group reported significantly higher levels of stress. CONCLUSIONS:The finding of no age difference between good and poor sleepers in young children with ASD and disruptive behaviors suggests that sleep problems are unlikely to resolve as might be expected in typically developing children. Likewise, the good and poor sleepers did not significantly differ in IQ. These findings add strong support for the need to screen for sleep disturbances in all children with ASD, regardless of age and cognitive level. Poor sleepers exhibited significantly greater daytime behavioral problems and parents of children in this group reported significantly higher levels of stress. Above and beyond the co-occurring disruptive behavior, poor sleep quality appears to pose substantial additive burden on child and parents.

Project description:BackgroundEarly parent-implemented intervention enhances parent-child interaction and improves language skills in children with autism spectrum disorders (ASD). Parent coaching is often delivered as standard care for children with ASD, where parents are taught to apply strategies in their child's play activities and daily routines to achieve the prior stated goals. However, the ability to conduct parent coaching in physical in-clinic sessions is limited by resource constraints such as clinic space and therapist manpower. Furthermore, parents may experience difficulties with the generalisation of intervention strategies taught in the clinic to their natural home environments. In this study, telerehabilitation is evaluated as an alternative platform to deliver parent coaching for parent-implemented interventions to children with ASD in their homes.MethodsThis parallel-group, randomised, controlled, non-inferiority trial aims to evaluate the effectiveness of parent coaching delivered through video conferencing (telerehabilitation) versus in-clinic (standard care) delivery. Children aged 15 to 48 months (n = 200) who meet the cut-off score for ASD on the Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule-2 are eligible. Parent-child dyads are randomly assigned to receive parent coaching either through weekly telerehabilitation or standard care. The primary outcome is the child's development as measured by the subscale and composite scores of a standardised developmental assessment. Primary analysis will determine if the lower boundary of the 95% confidence interval for the mean difference in pre-post change between groups exceeds -5 (the non-inferiority margin). Secondary outcomes are the child's adaptive behaviour, parent-child interaction, parental stress, and family quality of life. Outcomes will be measured pre-intervention, midterm, and post-intervention. Secondary analysis will determine if there is any between-group difference for the pre-post change in scores at the 5% significance level using two-sample t-test or Mann-Whitney U test.DiscussionAs a randomised controlled trial of a moderately large scale, this study will contribute to the limited existing literature on the effectiveness of parent coaching via telerehabilitation for early parent-implemented intervention for children with ASD. The results of this study will provide insights on whether telerehabilitation is comparable to conventional in-clinic parent coaching in enhancing parent-child interaction and improving language skills.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT05792449. Registered (retrospectively) on 31 March 2023.

Dataset Information

Moderators of Parent Training for Disruptive Behaviors in Young Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder.

Publications

Moderators of Parent Training for Disruptive Behaviors in Young Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets