Dataset Information

MiRNAs as biomarkers for diagnosis of heart failure: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

ABSTRACT:

Background

With the rapid development of molecular biology, the kind of mircoRNA (miRNA) has been introduced into emerging role both in cardiac development and pathological procedure. Thus, we conduct this meta-analysis to find out the role of circulating miRNA as a biomarker in detecting heart failure.

Methods

We searched PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and World Health Organization clinical trials registry center to identify relevant studies up to August 2016. We performed meta-analysis in a fixed/random-effect model using Meta-disc 1.4. We used STATA 14.0 to estimate the publication bias and meta-regression. Besides, we took use of SPSS 17.0 to evaluate variance between several groups. Information on true positive, false positive, false negative, and true negative, as well as the quality of research was extracted.

Results

We use results from 10 articles to analyze the pooled accuracy. The overall performance of total mixed miRNAs (TmiRs) detection was: pooled sensitivity, 0.74 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.72 to 0.75); pooled specificity, 0.69 (95%CI, 0.67 to 0.71); and area under the summary receiver operating characteristic curves value (SROC), 0.7991. The miRNA-423-5p (miR-423-5p) detection was: pooled sensitivity, 0.81 (95%CI, 0.76 to 0.85); pooled specificity, 0.67 (95%CI, 0.61 to 0.73); and SROC, 0.8600. However, taken the same patients population, we extracted the data of BNP for detecting heart failure and performed meta-analysis with acceptable SROC as 0.9291. Among the variance analysis, the diagnostic performance of miR-423-5p claimed significant advantages of other pooled results. However, the combination of miRNAs and BNP could increase the accuracy of detecting of heart failure. Unfortunately, there was no dramatic advantage of miR-423-5p compared to BNP protocol.

Conclusion

Despite interstudy variability, the performance test of miRNA for detecting heart failure revealed that miR-423-5p demonstrated the potential to be a biomarker. However, other miRNAs were not able to provide enough evidence on promising diagnostic value for heart failure based on the current data. Moreover, the combination of miRNAs and BNP could work as a better method to detection. Unfortunately, BNP was still the most convinced biomarker for such disease.

SUBMITTER: Yan H

PROVIDER: S-EPMC5459698 | biostudies-literature | 2017 Jun

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

miRNAs as biomarkers for diagnosis of heart failure: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Yan Hualin H Ma Fan F Zhang Yi Y Wang Chuan C Qiu Dajian D Zhou Kaiyu K Hua Yimin Y Li Yifei Y

Medicine 20170601 22

<h4>Background</h4>With the rapid development of molecular biology, the kind of mircoRNA (miRNA) has been introduced into emerging role both in cardiac development and pathological procedure. Thus, we conduct this meta-analysis to find out the role of circulating miRNA as a biomarker in detecting heart failure.<h4>Methods</h4>We searched PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and World Health Organization clinical trials registry center to identify relevant studies u ...[more]

PMID: 28562533

Similar Datasets

Project description:Evidence accumulates for associations between hypertensive pregnancy disorders and increased cardiovascular risk later. The main goal of this study was to explore shared biomarkers representing common pathogenic pathways between heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) and pre-eclampsia where these biomarkers might be potentially eligible for cardiovascular risk stratification in women after hypertensive pregnancy disorders. We sought for blood markers in women with diastolic dysfunction in a first literature search, and through a second search, we investigated whether these same biochemical markers were present in pre-eclampsia.This systematic review and meta-analysis presents two subsequent systematic searches in PubMed and EMBASE. Search I yielded 3014 studies on biomarkers discriminating women with HFpEF from female controls, of which 13 studies on 11 biochemical markers were included. Cases had HFpEF, and controls had no heart failure. The second search was for studies discriminating women with pre-eclampsia from women with non-hypertensive pregnancies with at least one of the biomarkers found in Search I. Search II yielded 1869 studies, of which 51 studies on seven biomarkers were included in meta-analyses and 79 studies on 12 biomarkers in systematic review.Eleven biological markers differentiated women with diastolic dysfunction from controls, of which the following 10 markers differentiated women with pre-eclampsia from controls as well: C-reactive protein, HDL, insulin, fatty acid-binding protein 4, brain natriuretic peptide, N terminal pro brain natriuretic peptide, adrenomedullin, mid-region pro adrenomedullin, cardiac troponin I, and cancer antigen 125.Our study supports the hypothesis that HFpEF in women shares a common pathogenic background with pre-eclampsia. The biomarkers representing inflammatory state, disturbances in myocardial function/structure, and unfavourable lipid metabolism may possibly be eligible for future prognostic tools.

Project description:AimsSarcopenia has been found to be frequently associated with co-morbidity among patients with heart failure (HF). However, there remain insufficient data to accurately estimate the global prevalence of sarcopenia in HF. Therefore, the purpose of this research was to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to estimate the current overall prevalence of sarcopenia in patients with HF.Methods and resultsWe searched relevant databases for studies published up to 13 July 2020, assessing sarcopenia in vpatients with HF. After careful screening, data of included articles were extracted with a predesigned Excel form. Then the pooled prevalence of sarcopenia in patients with HF was calculated using the random-effects model. The Q test was used to assess the heterogeneity, and I2 statistic was calculated to quantify and evaluate the heterogeneity. Subgroup analyses were conducted to determine potential sources of heterogeneity. A total of 2852 articles were initially identified, and after removing duplicate publications and applying the selection criteria, we reviewed 79 full-text articles. Finally, 11 articles (n = 1742 patients with HF) were included in this systematic review and meta-analysis. The pooled prevalence of sarcopenia in patients with HF was 34% [95% confidence interval (CI): 22-47%, I2 = 96.59%] and ranged from 10% to 69%. However, substantial heterogeneity between studies (I2 = 96.59%, P < 0.001) was observed. There was no significant heterogeneity between subgroups by sex (P = 0.803) or the method used to define sarcopenia (P = 0.307). While the heterogeneity between subgroups by population setting was statistically significant (P < 0.001), the pooled prevalence of sarcopenia was 55% (95% CI: 43-66%) for hospitalized patients with HF and 26% (95% CI: 16-37%) for ambulatory patients.ConclusionsSarcopenia was a common condition in patients with HF, and the prevalence of hospitalized patients was higher than for ambulatory patients. Early detection of sarcopenia was therefore important in patients with HF, and it was important to implement interventions so that physical therapists or managerial dieticians can easily be introduced into clinical practice.

Project description:BackgroundSalivary diagnostics and their utility as a nonaggressive approach for breast cancer diagnosis have been extensively studied in recent years. This meta-analysis assesses the diagnostic value of salivary biomarkers in differentiating between patients with breast cancer and controls.MethodsWe conducted a meta-analysis and systematic review of studies related to salivary diagnostics published in PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, Ovid, Science Direct, Web of Science (WOS), and Google Scholar. The articles were chosen utilizing inclusion and exclusion criteria, as well as assessing their quality. Specificity and sensitivity, along with negative and positive likelihood ratios (NLR and PLR) and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), were calculated based on random- or fixed-effects model. Area under the curve (AUC) and summary receiver-operating characteristic (SROC) were plotted and evaluated, and Fagan's Nomogram was evaluated for clinical utility.ResultsOur systematic review and meta-analysis included 14 papers containing 121 study units with 8639 adult subjects (4149 breast cancer patients and 4490 controls without cancer). The pooled specificity and sensitivity were 0.727 (95% CI: 0.713-0.740) and 0.717 (95% CI: 0.703-0.730), respectively. The pooled NLR and PLR were 0.396 (95% CI: 0.364-0.432) and 2.597 (95% CI: 2.389-2.824), respectively. The pooled DOR was 7.837 (95% CI: 6.624-9.277), with the AUC equal to 0.801. The Fagan's nomogram showed post-test probabilities of 28% and 72% for negative and positive outcomes, respectively. We also conducted subgroup analyses to determine specificity, sensitivity, DOR, PLR, and NLR based on the mean age of patients (≤52 or >52 years old), saliva type (stimulated and unstimulated saliva), biomarker measurement method (mass spectrometry [MS] and non-MS measurement methods), sample size (≤55 or >55), biomarker type (proteomics, metabolomics, transcriptomics and proteomics, and reagent-free biophotonic), and nations.ConclusionSaliva, as a noninvasive biomarker, has the potential to accurately differentiate breast cancer patients from healthy controls.