Unknown

Dataset Information

0

LC-QTOF-MS Analysis and Activity Profiles of Popular Antioxidant Dietary Supplements in Terms of Quality Control.


ABSTRACT: The dietary supplements with claimed antioxidant activity constitute a substantial part of the dietary supplement market. In this study, we performed the LC-QTOF-MS analysis and investigated the activity profiles of popular antioxidant dietary supplements from different chemical groups in terms of quality control. The commonly used antioxidant tests and statistical analysis revealed that substantial part of the results was comparable if 1?g sample was considered, but while comparing single and daily doses, significant differences in antioxidant values were noticed in all assays. The best antioxidant activity was obtained in ORAC assay (from 142 to 13814??M of Trolox equivalents per 1?g of sample), and the strongest correlation occurred between TPC and ORAC. The LC-QTOF-MS analysis revealed that catechins were present in samples having the best antioxidant activity and that dietary supplements showing the weakest activity contained very small amount of any chemical constituents.

SUBMITTER: Sieniawska E 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC5470020 | biostudies-literature | 2017

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

LC-QTOF-MS Analysis and Activity Profiles of Popular Antioxidant Dietary Supplements in Terms of Quality Control.

Sieniawska Elwira E   Baj Tomasz T   Sawicki Rafal R   Wanat Aleksandra A   Wojtanowski Krzysztof Kamil KK   Ginalska Grazyna G   Zgorka Grazyna G   Szymanska Jolanta J  

Oxidative medicine and cellular longevity 20170531


The dietary supplements with claimed antioxidant activity constitute a substantial part of the dietary supplement market. In this study, we performed the LC-QTOF-MS analysis and investigated the activity profiles of popular antioxidant dietary supplements from different chemical groups in terms of quality control. The commonly used antioxidant tests and statistical analysis revealed that substantial part of the results was comparable if 1 g sample was considered, but while comparing single and d  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC7344666 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8226608 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8615083 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8267200 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7550543 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7824486 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7919790 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6269782 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7914583 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7023254 | biostudies-literature