Dataset Information

Potential Usefulness of Clopidogrel Pharmacogenetics in Cerebral Endovascular Procedures and Carotid Artery Stenting.

ABSTRACT: Previous reports have shown inadequate response to dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) with aspirin and clopidogrel in 5-30% of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI), due mostly to clopidogrel resistance. This prevalence increases up to 66% in patients undergoing neurointerventional procedures. However, clinical significance of CYP2C19 genotypes in neurointerventional procedures or carotid artery stenting (CAS) is unknown.The purpose of this review is to update our current knowledge and understanding of the pharmacogenetic basis for poor clopidogrel responsiveness in patients undergoing CAS and endovascular interventions as well as to explore usefulness of genotyping to reduce the rate of procedure-related thrombosis that results in ischemic complications.A literature search for pharmacogenetic studies in cerebral endovascular interventions and CAS was conducted on three databases using a list of the most relevant pharmacogenetic biomarkers.The review included 7 papers involving 3 genetic polymorphisms on CYP2C19 and 442 subjects. Patients harboring at least one loss-of-function CYP2C19 polymorphism (e.g., CYP2C19*2 and *3) are at an increased risk of thromboembolic complications such as stent thrombosis following neurointerventional procedures. Notably, patients who carry the gain-of-function CYP2C19*17 allele may have increased risk of ischemic events following endovascular treatment, independent of clopidogrel responsiveness.Studies assessing the influence of CYP2C19 polymorphisms on high on-treatment platelet reactivity in CAS and cerebrovascular disease patients are still limited and need further validation in large multicenter studies. This review covers an important topic in the field of antiplatelet therapy for cerebral endovascular procedures and CAS.

SUBMITTER: Duconge J

PROVIDER: S-EPMC5478430 | biostudies-literature | 2017

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Potential Usefulness of Clopidogrel Pharmacogenetics in Cerebral Endovascular Procedures and Carotid Artery Stenting.

Duconge Jorge J Hernandez-Suarez Dagmar F DF

Current clinical pharmacology 20170101 1

<h4>Background</h4>Previous reports have shown inadequate response to dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) with aspirin and clopidogrel in 5-30% of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI), due mostly to clopidogrel resistance. This prevalence increases up to 66% in patients undergoing neurointerventional procedures. However, clinical significance of CYP2C19 genotypes in neurointerventional procedures or carotid artery stenting (CAS) is unknown.<h4>Objective</h4>The purpose of t ...[more]

PMID: 28245774

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundFew studies have focused on cerebral hemodynamics in the early stage following carotid artery stenting (CAS). This retrospective cohort study aimed to investigate cerebral hemodynamic changes within 6 hours of unilateral CAS in patients with different degrees of carotid stenosis.MethodsA total of 104 patients who underwent CAS accompanied by transcranial color-code Doppler or transcranial Doppler were enrolled in the study. The participants were divided into the following 3 groups based on the degree of carotid stenosis: severe stenosis group, extreme stenosis group, and near occlusion group. Bilateral middle cerebral artery (MCA) peak systolic velocity (PSV) and pulsatility index (PI) were measured using transcranial color-code Doppler before and 1 and 3 hours following CAS. Blood pressure, MCA-PSV, and PI were compared among the 3 groups.ResultsAt 1 hour following CAS, ipsilateral MCA-PSV increased compared to the baseline in the severe stenosis group [84±21 vs. 93±27 cm/s; 8.1%; interquartile range (IQR), 1.4-20.1%; P<0.001]. A similar hemodynamic change, but of a larger magnitude, was observed in the extreme stenosis group (83±24 vs. 100±29 cm/s; 20.8%; IQR, 5.3-33.1%; P<0.001) and near occlusion group (73±24 vs. 109±29 cm/s, 45.8%; IQR, 24.3-73.1%; P<0.001). At 3 hours after CAS, the hemodynamic changes were the same as those at 1 hour. PI increased in all 3 groups following CAS. A subgroup analysis was performed according to symptoms, sex, smoking status, history of hypertension, and presence of hyperlipidemia or diabetes, and the increase in ipsilateral MCA-PSV was not significant. In terms of adverse events, only 4 patients in the near occlusion group experienced transient post-CAS hyperperfusion.ConclusionsThe ipsilateral MCA-PSV and PI in patients following unilateral CAS increased significantly in the initial hours. The increase in ipsilateral MCA-PSV was considerably higher in patients with a severe degree of stenosis. Near occlusion of the carotid artery was an independent risk factor for hyperperfusion after unilateral CAS.

Project description:BackgroundIn-stent restenosis is a crucial problem after carotid artery stenting, but the exact predictors of in-stent restenosis remain unclear. We aimed to evaluate the effect of cerebral collateral circulation on in-stent restenosis after carotid artery stenting and to establish a clinical prediction model for in-stent restenosis.MethodsThis retrospective case-control study enrolled 296 patients with severe carotid artery stenosis of C1 segment (≥70%) who underwent stent therapy from June 2015 to December 2018. Based on follow-up data, the patients were divided into the in-stent restenosis and no in-stent restenosis groups. The collateral circulation of the brain was graded according to the criteria of the American Society for Interventional and Therapy Neuroradiology/Society for Interventional Radiology (ASITN/SIR). Clinical data were collected, such as age, sex, traditional vascular risk factors, blood cell count, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, uric acid, stenosis degree before stenting and residual stenosis rate, and medication after stenting. Binary logistic regression analysis was performed to identify potential predictors of in-stent restenosis, and a clinical prediction model for in-stent restenosis after carotid artery stenting was established.ResultsBinary logistic regression analysis showed that poor collateral circulation was an independent predictor of in-stent restenosis (P=0.003). We also found that a 1% increase in residual stenosis rate was associated with a 9% increase in the risk of in-stent restenosis (P=0.02). Ischemic stroke history (P=0.03), family history of ischemic stroke (P<0.001), in-stent restenosis history (P<0.001), and nonstandard medication after stenting (P=0.04) were predictors of in-stent restenosis. The risk of in-stent restenosis was lowest when the residual stenosis rate was 12.5% after carotid artery stenting. Furthermore, we used some significant parameters to construct a binary logistic regression prediction model for in-stent restenosis after carotid artery stenting in the form of a nomogram.ConclusionsCollateral circulation is an independent predictor of in-stent restenosis after successful carotid artery stenting, and the residual stenosis rate tends to be below 12.5% to reduce restenosis risk. The standard medication should be strictly carried out for patients after stenting to prevent in-stent restenosis.

Dataset Information

Potential Usefulness of Clopidogrel Pharmacogenetics in Cerebral Endovascular Procedures and Carotid Artery Stenting.

Publications

Potential Usefulness of Clopidogrel Pharmacogenetics in Cerebral Endovascular Procedures and Carotid Artery Stenting.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets