Dataset Information

Clinimetric properties of hip abduction strength measurements obtained using a handheld dynamometer in individuals with a lower extremity amputation.

ABSTRACT:

Introduction

Suitable handheld dynamometer (HHD)-techniques to test hip abduction strength in individuals with a lower extremity amputation, irrespective of their amputation level are absent. The aim of this study was to optimise a HHD-technique and to test its reproducibility and validity.

Methods

This study involved three phases, in which two techniques were evaluated. Both HHD-techniques used a lever-arm of 22 centimetre. HHD-technique 1 used a break-technique. After obtaining within-session test-retest reproducibility (phase 1) we optimised the HHD-technique by adding a fixation-belt and using a make-technique (HHD-technique 2). We tested the within-session test-retest and inter-rater reproducibility (phase 2) and the validity (phase 3) of HHD-technique 2 using an isokinetic dynamometer. New cohorts of participants were recruited for each phase.

Results

Phase 1: we tested HHD-technique 1 in 26 participants with a lower extremity amputation. It was test-retest reproducible (ICC3.1agreement: 0.80-0.92, standard error of measurement (SEM): 3.1-4.4 Nm and smallest detectable change (SDC): 8.6-12.3 Nm). There were questions regarding the validity of the measurement, because the mean muscle torque of the residual limb and sound limb were similar, which is uncommon. Phase 2: reproducibility of HHD-technique 2 was tested in 44 participants with a lower extremity amputation. It was test-retest reproducible (ICC3.1agreement: 0.96-0.97, SEM: 3.9-4.7 Nm and SDC: 10.9-12.9 Nm) but not inter-rater reproducible despite having good reliability (ICC3.1agreement: 0.92, SEM: 6.9-7.6 Nm and SDC: 19.2-21.2 Nm). Systematic bias and bias related to the magnitude of the muscle torque was suspected. Phase 3: the concurrent validity was established in 30 healthy participants (r = 0.84). Systematic bias in measurement error was present, including a consistent overestimation of the muscle torque of 28% using the HHD.

Conclusion

HHD-technique 2 is a test-retest reproducible and valid measuring technique The technique may be further optimised by the use of an external device to stabilise the HHD.

SUBMITTER: Leijendekkers RA

PROVIDER: S-EPMC5481015 | biostudies-literature | 2017

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Clinimetric properties of hip abduction strength measurements obtained using a handheld dynamometer in individuals with a lower extremity amputation.

Leijendekkers Ruud A RA Hinte Gerben van GV Sman Amy D AD Staal J Bart JB Nijhuis-van der Sanden Maria W G MWG Hoogeboom Thomas J TJ

PloS one 20170622 6

<h4>Introduction</h4>Suitable handheld dynamometer (HHD)-techniques to test hip abduction strength in individuals with a lower extremity amputation, irrespective of their amputation level are absent. The aim of this study was to optimise a HHD-technique and to test its reproducibility and validity.<h4>Methods</h4>This study involved three phases, in which two techniques were evaluated. Both HHD-techniques used a lever-arm of 22 centimetre. HHD-technique 1 used a break-technique. After obtaining ...[more]

PMID: 28640926

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundDespite the association between hip abduction weakness and non-contact anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury, hip abduction strength is rarely considered in return to sport decision-making following ACL reconstruction (ACLR).Hypothesis/purposeThe purpose of this study was to compare self-reported function, objective functional test performance, and re-injury rates in patients with high (≥33%) versus low (<33% ) isometric hip abduction strength to body weight (BW) ratios when returning to activity following ACLR.Study designCohort study.MethodsData were gathered from a single-surgeon database and included baseline demographics. Clinical outcomes were assessed at the time of release to activity and included self-reported outcomes and a functional testing battery. Isometric hip abduction strength was obtained using a handheld dynamometer. Groups were dichotomized into those with low vs high strength to BW ratios. Two-year follow-up was performed using the single assessment numeric evaluation (SANE). Data were analyzed using univariate general linear models with an alpha level of .05.ResultsOf the 528 enrolled patients, 364 (68.9%) demonstrated a low strength to BW ratio. Baseline comparisons revealed more females and higher BMI (P <.05) in the <33% group. At release to activity, the <33% BW group demonstrated lower International Knee Documentation Committee survey scores (88.2 ± 13.6 vs 93.5 ± 10.3, P<.01), ACL-Return to Sport After Injury (76.2 ± 15.4 vs 88.5 ± 16.9, P<.01) scores, and isokinetic hamstring peak torque (P=.04). At 2-years, the <33% group reported lower SANE scores (83.3 ± 21.1 vs 92.83 ± 11.4, P=.05) with no significant differences in re-injuries.ConclusionPatients with low hip abduction strength to BW ratios demonstrated lower subjective function, psychological readiness, and isokinetic hamstring peak torque when completing functional testing following ACLR. Subjective deficits remained at 2-years.Level of evidenceLevel 3.Key termsACL injury, hip abduction strength, return to sport, strength ratio.Clinical relevanceAssessing isometric hip abduction strength to body weight ratio may be beneficial in determining readiness to return to sport following ACL reconstruction.What is known about the subjectThree prospective studies have provided conflicting evidence regarding the relationship between hip abduction strength and ACL injury. A clinical cut-point of hip abduction strength:BW ratio <35.4% has been suggested to identify athletes at risk of sustaining a non-contact ACL injury. To our knowledge no studies have examined isometric hip abduction strength:BW ratios in athletes attempting to return to sport following ACLR.What this study adds to existing knowledgeThis study examines the potential for hip abduction strength:BW ratio to be included as an additional metric in return to sport testing batteries.

Project description:BackgroundMuscle strength measurements using hand-held dynamometry (HHD) can be affected by the inadequate strength of the tester and lack of stabilization of the participants and the device. A portable HHD anchoring system was designed that enabled the measurement of isometric knee extensor muscle strength in a supine position. This can be used with individuals who are unable to assume the sitting position required for the measurement of knee extensor strength in conventional isokinetic dynamometry (IKD). The aim of this study was to evaluate the reliability and validity of knee extensor strength measurements using this device.MethodsThe maximal knee extensor isometric strength of the dominant leg in healthy adults aged 20 to 40 years was tested. Three trials of three contractions were assessed by two raters using the portable dynamometer anchoring system whilst the participant was in the supine position. After the three measurement trials, peak knee extensor torque was evaluated using IKD. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and 95% limits of agreement (LOA) for intra- and inter-rater reliability were obtained.ResultsThirty-nine participants (19 male and 20 female, aged 30.08 ± 4.16 y), completed the three measurement trials. The ICC for intra-rater reliability was 0.98 for the maximum measurements of knee extensor strength (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.96-0.98) and 0.98 (95% CI: 0.96-0.99) for inter-rater reliability. The mean difference (%) between the maximum knee extensor strength measurements of each trial was 1.02% (LOA range: - 11.13 to 13.16%) for intra-rater and - 1.44% (LOA range: - 13.98 to 11.08%) for inter-rater measurements. The Pearson correlation coefficient of the maximum voluntary peak torque measurements with the portable dynamometer anchoring system and IKD was 0.927.ConclusionsThe portable dynamometer anchoring system is a reliable and valid tool for measuring isometric knee extensor strength in a supine position. Future clinical feasibility studies are needed to determine if this equipment can be applied to people with severe illness or disabilities.Trial registrationKCT0003041 .

Project description:IntroductionA unilateral transfemoral amputation (TFA) has a major impact on function. A leg-length discrepancy is the primary structural change, accompanied by the loss of lower-limb muscle volume and function. Prostheses can help individuals with a TFA to regain function, but such individuals still do not reach the functional level of unimpaired peers and exhibit gait deviations. This study gives insight into the causality between residual limb strength and gait deviations in individuals with a TFA.MethodsA convenient sample of 13 male individuals with a TFA (38.0 ± 12.6y; 179.7cm ± 6.5cm; 82.9kg ± 12.4kg) was recruited for this study. One participant with TFA was excluded, as he differed from the rest of the cohort, in residual limb length and the use of walking aids. A cohort of 18 unimpaired subjects served as a reference group (REF; nine females; 44y ± 13y; 174cm ± 9cm; 71kg ± 12kg). All participants underwent a conventional clinical gait analysis using a marker based 3D motion capture system and force platforms. Kinematics and kinetics were determined utilizing standard modelling methods. All subjects underwent a strength test, using a custom-made device to determine isometric moments of the hip joint in abduction, adduction, extension, and flexion. Peak values for maximum isometric moments for each movement direction and selected kinematic and kinetic values were derived from the results. Differences between subjects with TFA and unimpaired were compared using a Mann-Whitney U Test and associations between groups by Spearman's rank correlation.ResultsThe participants with a TFA showed a significantly lower maximum isometric moment for hip abduction (0.85 vs. 1.41 Nm/kg p < .001), adduction (0.87 vs. 1.37 Nm/kg p = .001) and flexion (0.93 vs. 1.63 Nm/kg p = .010) compared to the reference group. Typically reported gait deviations in people with a TFA were identified, i.e. significant lower cadence and increased step width. We further identified altered coronal plane hip and trunk kinematics, with significantly higher ranges of motion during involved side stance-phase. Gait kinetics of individuals with a TFA showed significantly lower peak values during stance for hip abduction, adduction and extension moments in comparison to the reference group. We identified a moderate negative correlation between maximum isometric moment for hip abduction and trunk obliquity range of motion (ρ = -0.45) for participants with a TFA, which was not significant (p = 0.14).ConclusionWe showed that there are strength deficits in individuals with TFA and, that there are moderate correlations between gait deviations, i.e. lateral trunk lean during involved side stance and isometric hip abductor moment. The relation between maximum moments during gait and the corresponding maximum isometric moment may therefore be helpful to detect strength related compensation mechanisms. However, the moderate, non-significant correlation between lateral trunk lean and isometric hip abductor moment was the only one which corresponded directly to a gait deviation. Thus results must be interpreted with care. This study suggests that gait deviations in individuals with TFA are multifactorial and cannot be exclusively explained by their strength deficits. Future studies should explore the relationship between strength with kinematics and kinetics during gait in this population.

Project description:Lower extremity amputation is often performed in patients where both lower extremities are at risk due to peripheral arterial disease or diabetes, yet the proportion of patients who progress to amputation of their contralateral limb is not well defined. We sought to determine the rate of subsequent amputation on both the ipsilateral and contralateral lower extremities following initial amputation.We conducted a retrospective review of all patients undergoing lower extremity amputation (exclusive of trauma or tumor) at our institution from 1998 to 2010. We used International Classification of Diseases-Ninth Revision codes to identify patients and procedures as well as comorbidities. Outcomes included the proportion of patients at 1 and 5 years undergoing contralateral and ipsilateral major and minor amputation stratified by initial major vs minor amputation. Cox proportional hazards regression analysis was performed to determine predictors of major contralateral amputation.We identified 1715 patients. Mean age was 67.2 years, 63% were male, 77% were diabetic, and 34% underwent an initial major amputation. After major amputation, 5.7% and 11.5% have a contralateral major amputation at 1 and 5 years, respectively. After minor amputation, 3.2% and 8.4% have a contralateral major amputation at 1 and 5 years while 10.5% and 14.2% have an ipsilateral major amputation at 1 and 5 years, respectively. Cox proportional hazards regression analysis revealed end-stage renal disease (hazard ratio [HR], 3.9; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.3-6.5), chronic renal insufficiency (HR, 2.2; 95% CI, 1.5-3.3), atherosclerosis without diabetic neuropathy (HR, 2.9; 95% CI, 1.5-5.7), atherosclerosis with diabetic neuropathy (HR, 9.1; 95% CI, 3.7-22.5), and initial major amputation (HR, 1.8; 95% CI, 1.3-2.6) were independently predictive of subsequent contralateral major amputation.Rates of contralateral limb amputation are high and predicted by renal disease, atherosclerosis, and atherosclerosis with diabetic neuropathy. Physicians and patients should be alert to the high risk of subsequent amputation in the contralateral leg. All patients, but particularly those at increased risk, should undergo close surveillance and counseling to help prevent subsequent amputations in their contralateral lower extremity.

Dataset Information

Clinimetric properties of hip abduction strength measurements obtained using a handheld dynamometer in individuals with a lower extremity amputation.

Introduction

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Publications

Clinimetric properties of hip abduction strength measurements obtained using a handheld dynamometer in individuals with a lower extremity amputation.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets