Dataset Information

Measuring genome conservation across taxa: divided strains and united kingdoms.

ABSTRACT: Species evolutionary relationships have traditionally been defined by sequence similarities of phylogenetic marker molecules, recently followed by whole-genome phylogenies based on gene order, average ortholog similarity or gene content. Here, we introduce genome conservation--a novel metric of evolutionary distances between species that simultaneously takes into account, both gene content and sequence similarity at the whole-genome level. Genome conservation represents a robust distance measure, as demonstrated by accurate phylogenetic reconstructions. The genome conservation matrix for all presently sequenced organisms exhibits a remarkable ability to define evolutionary relationships across all taxonomic ranges. An assessment of taxonomic ranks with genome conservation shows that certain ranks are inadequately described and raises the possibility for a more precise and quantitative taxonomy in the future. All phylogenetic reconstructions are available at the genome phylogeny server: .

SUBMITTER: Kunin V

PROVIDER: S-EPMC548337 | biostudies-literature | 2005

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Measuring genome conservation across taxa: divided strains and united kingdoms.

Kunin Victor V Ahren Dag D Goldovsky Leon L Janssen Paul P Ouzounis Christos A CA

Nucleic acids research 20050128 2

Species evolutionary relationships have traditionally been defined by sequence similarities of phylogenetic marker molecules, recently followed by whole-genome phylogenies based on gene order, average ortholog similarity or gene content. Here, we introduce genome conservation--a novel metric of evolutionary distances between species that simultaneously takes into account, both gene content and sequence similarity at the whole-genome level. Genome conservation represents a robust distance measure ...[more]

PMID: 15681613

Similar Datasets

Project description:Assessing the importance of different taxa for inferring evolutionary history is a critical, but underutilized, aspect of systematics. Quantifying the importance of all taxa within a dataset provides an empirical measurement that can establish a ranking of extant taxa for ecological study and/or quantify the relative importance of newly announced or redescribed specimens to enable the disentangling of novelty and inferential influence. Here, we illustrate the use of taxon influence indices through analysis of both molecular and morphological datasets, introducing a modified Bayesian approach to the taxon influence index that accounts for model and topological uncertainty. Quantification of taxon influence using the Bayesian approach produced clear rankings for both dataset types. Bayesian taxon rankings differed from maximum likelihood (ML)-derived rankings from a mitogenomic dataset, and the highest ranking taxa exhibited the largest interquartile range in influence estimate, suggesting variance in the estimate must be taken into account when the ranking of taxa is the feature of interest. Application of the Bayesian taxon influence index to a recent morphological analysis of the Tully Monster (Tullimonstrum) reveals that it exhibits consistently low inferential importance across two recent treatments of the taxon with alternative character codings. These results lend support to the idea that taxon influence indices may be robust to character coding and therefore effective for morphological analyses. These results underscore a need for the development of approaches to, and application of, taxon influence analyses both for the purpose of establishing robust rankings for future inquiry and for explicitly quantifying the importance of individual taxa. Quantifying the importance of individual taxa refocuses debates in morphological studies from questions of character choice/significance and taxon sampling to explicitly analytical techniques, and guides discussion of the context of new discoveries.

Project description:The congruence between the order of cladistic branching and the first appearance dates of fossil lineages can be quantified using a variety of indices. Good matching is a prerequisite for the accurate time calibration of trees, while the distribution of congruence indices across large samples of cladograms has underpinned claims about temporal and taxonomic patterns of completeness in the fossil record. The most widely used stratigraphic congruence indices are the stratigraphic consistency index (SCI), the modified Manhattan stratigraphic measure (MSM*), and the gap excess ratio (GER) (plus its derivatives; the topological GER and the modified GER). Many factors are believed to variously bias these indices, with several empirical and simulation studies addressing some subset of the putative interactions. This study combines both approaches to quantify the effects (on all five indices) of eight variables reasoned to constrain the distribution of possible values (the number of taxa, tree balance, tree resolution, range of first occurrence (FO) dates, center of gravity of FO dates, the variability of FO dates, percentage of extant taxa, and percentage of taxa with no fossil record). Our empirical data set comprised 647 published animal and plant cladograms spanning the entire Phanerozoic, and for these data we also modeled the effects of mean age of FOs (as a proxy for clade age), the taxonomic rank of the clade, and the higher taxonomic group to which it belonged. The center of gravity of FO dates had not been investigated hitherto, and this was found to correlate most strongly with some measures of stratigraphic congruence in our empirical study (top-heavy clades had better congruence). The modified GER was the index least susceptible to bias. We found significant differences across higher taxa for all indices; arthropods had lower congruence and tetrapods higher congruence. Stratigraphic congruence-however measured-also varied throughout the Phanerozoic, reflecting the taxonomic composition of our sample. Notably, periods containing a high proportion of arthropods had poorer congruence overall than those with higher proportions of tetrapods. [Fossil calibration; gap excess ratio; manhattan stratigraphic metric; molecular clocks; stratigraphic congruence.].

Dataset Information

Measuring genome conservation across taxa: divided strains and united kingdoms.

Publications

Measuring genome conservation across taxa: divided strains and united kingdoms.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets