Dataset Information

Single-Bundle Augmentation for a Partial Tear of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament.

ABSTRACT: Given the prevalence of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tears in young athletes, it is essential to elucidate and illustrate surgical interventions that return the most favorable outcomes. Although most ACL injuries are full-thickness tears, occasionally either the anteromedial (AM) or posterolateral (PL) bundle is torn in isolation, allowing consideration of an ACL reconstruction or augmentation. Because the ACL-deficient knee has been shown to exhibit less proprioceptive feedback, the preservation of the intact bundle may offer an inherent component of stability. After arthroscopy has confirmed a partial ACL tear, the decision to augment the intact bundle can be made. The technique is adapted from principles of the double-bundle reconstruction such that the graft follows the path of either the native AM bundle or the native PL bundle, depending on the location of the partial tear. We present our surgical technique for ACL AM bundle augmentation with PL bundle reconstruction using a semitendinosus tendon autograft.

SUBMITTER: Rao AJ

PROVIDER: S-EPMC5496197 | biostudies-literature | 2017 Jun

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Single-Bundle Augmentation for a Partial Tear of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament.

Rao Allison J AJ Cvetanovich Gregory L GL Zuke William A WA Go Beatrice B Forsythe Brian B

Arthroscopy techniques 20170626 3

Given the prevalence of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tears in young athletes, it is essential to elucidate and illustrate surgical interventions that return the most favorable outcomes. Although most ACL injuries are full-thickness tears, occasionally either the anteromedial (AM) or posterolateral (PL) bundle is torn in isolation, allowing consideration of an ACL reconstruction or augmentation. Because the ACL-deficient knee has been shown to exhibit less proprioceptive feedback, the preserv ...[more]

PMID: 28706842

Similar Datasets

Project description:ObjectivesPartial ACL tears are increasingly recognized in young active patients. They can evolve into complete tears. Controversy exists regarding the need to spare intact ACL bundle as it has its advantages considering biomechanical strength, blood supply and proprioception. The current study determined the challenges in partial ACL tear management and assessed the functional outcomes.MethodsTwenty consecutive patients with partial ACL tears were studied. Inclusion criteria were: age 16-45yrs and patients operated for partial ACL tear. Exclusion criteria were: combined ACL-PCL injuries, associated collateral injuries, complete ACL tear, chondral defect or bony malalignment and patients with radiographic signs of arthritis. 'Partial' tear was defined as continuous fibers from native tibial ACL footprint to native femoral ACL footprint in arthroscopy. Clinical and radiological assessment was done to evaluate anteromedial(AM) or posterolateral(PL) bundle tears. We used the term "ACL-augmentation" without disturbing the intact bundle or preserving the intact fibers as much as possible. Functional scoring was done using Lysholm score. Standard post-operative protocols were followed. Statistical analysis was done using SPSS software.ResultsMean age of patients was 31.2 years. Physically active age group (<30yrs) included 62.5% patients. Males were 87.5%. Pain and instability were the presenting complaints in 75% and 70% respectively. Average duration of presentation since injury was 4.2 months. Sports activities were the most common mode of injury (45%) followed by road traffic accidents (37.5%). Anterior drawer test was positive in 40%, pivot shift in 35% and Lachman test was positive in 65%. On arthroscopy, 65% had AM bundle tears and 35% had PL bundle tears. The intact bundle was found lax in 13% cases. Associated meniscal tear was present in 28% patients. Stiff knee was the most common post-operative complaint. Preoperative Lysholm knee score of 74.5 improved to 87.7 at 12months (p < 0.001). Around 97.5% of the patients reported outcomes as good and fair.ConclusionThe treatment strategy needs to be individualized. The ACL augmentation needs more systematic and accurate placement of portals while sparing the intact ACL fibers. For AM bundle, tibial tunnel entry point is about 1-2 cm medial to tibial tuberosity. For PL bundle, it is about 3-4 cm medial to tibial tuberosity to protect the AM bundle. Long term studies with greater number of subjects are required.

Project description:Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) deficiency alters 6 degrees of freedom knee kinematics, yet only anterior translation and internal rotation have been the primary measures in previous studies.To compare the 6 degrees of freedom knee kinematics and the graft forces after single- and double-bundle ACL reconstructions under various external loading conditions.Controlled laboratory study.Ten human cadaveric knees were tested with a robotic testing system under 4 conditions: intact, ACL deficient, single-bundle reconstructed with a quadrupled hamstring tendon graft, and double-bundle reconstructed with 2 looped hamstring tendon grafts. Knee kinematics and forces of the ACL or ACL graft in each knee were measured under 3 loading conditions: an anterior tibial load of 134 N, a simulated quadriceps muscle load of 400 N, and combined tibial torques (10 N.m valgus and 5 N.m internal tibial torques) at 0 degrees , 15 degrees , 30 degrees , 60 degrees , and 90 degrees of knee flexion.The double-bundle reconstruction restored the anterior and medial laxities closer to the intact knee than the single-bundle reconstruction. However, the internal rotation of the tibia under the simulated quadriceps muscle load was significantly decreased when compared with the intact knee after both reconstructions, more so after double-bundle reconstruction (P < .05). The entire graft force of the double-bundle reconstruction was more similar to that of the intact ACL than that of the single-bundle reconstruction. However, the posterolateral bundle graft in the double-bundle reconstructed knee was overloaded as compared with the intact posterolateral bundle.The double-bundle reconstruction can better restore the normal anterior-posterior and medial-lateral laxities than the single-bundle reconstruction can, but an overloading of the posterolateral bundle graft can occur in a double-bundle reconstructed knee.Both single-bundle and double-bundle techniques cannot restore the rotational laxities and the ACL force distributions of the intact knee.

Dataset Information

Single-Bundle Augmentation for a Partial Tear of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament.

Publications

Single-Bundle Augmentation for a Partial Tear of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets