Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT: Background
The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of patients with pathologic T0 esophageal carcinoma after neoadjuvant therapy and surgery.Methods
We searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Medline databases from inception up to November 12, 2016. The meta-analysis was performed to compare odds ratios (OR) for overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), local control (LC), and distant control (DC).Results
Eight published studies of 837 patients were included in the meta-analysis. Data showed that the ypT0N1 group was associated with worse outcomes compared with the ypT0N0 group. The pooled OR and 95% confidence interval (CI) for 3-year and 5-year OS were 3.08 [2.07, 4.57] and 4.27 [2.76, 6.59], respectively. Whereas, the pooled OR and 95% CI for 3-year and 5-year DFS were 3.90 [2.08, 7.34] and 5.17 [1.93, 13.87], respectively. The pooled OR and 95% CI for LR and DR were 4.52 [1.72, 11.91] and 2.65 [1.38, 5.09], respectively.Conclusions
Remnant lymph node metastases after neoadjuvant therapy and surgery in patients with pathologic T0 esophageal carcinoma portend poor survival, and it is an important prognostic factor.
SUBMITTER: Lv HW
PROVIDER: S-EPMC5500072 | biostudies-literature | 2017 Jun
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Lv Hong-Wei HW Li Yin Y Zhou Mei-Hong MH Cheng Ji-Wei JW Xing Wen-Qun WQ
Medicine 20170601 26
<h4>Background</h4>The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of patients with pathologic T0 esophageal carcinoma after neoadjuvant therapy and surgery.<h4>Methods</h4>We searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Medline databases from inception up to November 12, 2016. The meta-analysis was performed to compare odds ratios (OR) for overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), local control (LC), and distant control (DC).<h4>Results</h4>Eight published studies of 837 patients ...[more]