Unknown

Dataset Information

0

Acoustic ranging in poison frogs-it is not about signal amplitude alone.


ABSTRACT:

Abstract

Acoustic ranging allows identifying the distance of a sound source and mediates inter-individual spacing and aggression in territorial species. Birds and mammals are known to use more complex cues than only sound pressure level (SPL), which can be influenced by the signaller and signal transmission in non-predictable ways and thus is not reliable by itself. For frogs, only SPL is currently known to mediate inter-individual distances, but we hypothesise that the strong territoriality of Dendrobatids could make the use of complex cues for ranging highly beneficial for this family. Therefore, we tested the ranging abilities of territorial males of Allobates femoralis (Dendrobatidae, Aromobatinae) in playback trials, using amplitude-normalized signals that were naturally degraded over distance, and synthetic signals that were masked with different levels of noise. Frogs responded significantly less to signals recorded from larger distances, regardless of SPL and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), but showed no differential response to natural minimum and maximum SNRs across the typical communication range in wild populations. This indicates that frogs used signal amplitude and SNR only as ancillary cues when assessing the distance of sound sources and relied instead mainly on more complex cues, such as spectral degradation or reverberation. We suggest that this ability mediates territorial spacing and mate choice in A. femoralis. Good ranging abilities might also play a role in the remarkable orientation performance of this species, probably by enabling the establishment of a mental acoustic map of the habitat.

Significance statement

Acoustic ranging allows the distance of vocalizing competitors and mates to be identified. While birds and mammals are known to use complex cues such as temporal degradation, frequency-dependent attenuation and reverberation for ranging, previous research indicated that frogs rely only on signal amplitude (sound pressure level) to assess the distance of other callers. The present study shows for the first time that also poison frogs can make use of more complex cues, an ability which is likely to be highly beneficial in their territorial social organization and probably can also be used for orientation.

SUBMITTER: Ringler M 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC5506510 | biostudies-literature | 2017

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

Acoustic ranging in poison frogs-it is not about signal amplitude alone.

Ringler Max M   Szipl Georgine G   Hödl Walter W   Khil Leander L   Kofler Barbara B   Lonauer Michael M   Provin Christina C   Ringler Eva E  

Behavioral ecology and sociobiology 20170712 8


<h4>Abstract</h4>Acoustic ranging allows identifying the distance of a sound source and mediates inter-individual spacing and aggression in territorial species. Birds and mammals are known to use more complex cues than only sound pressure level (SPL), which can be influenced by the signaller and signal transmission in non-predictable ways and thus is not reliable by itself. For frogs, only SPL is currently known to mediate inter-individual distances, but we hypothesise that the strong territoria  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC4213648 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC4670055 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC9122496 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7678260 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6661358 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC10561973 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC3076872 | biostudies-other
| S-EPMC6431022 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC240697 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5834227 | biostudies-literature